[Libreoffice-qa] Minutes of ESC call: 2014-10-16

2014-10-17 Thread Jan Holesovsky
* Present: Caolán, Jacobo, Kendy, Andras, Miklos, Cloph, Muthu, Norbert, David, Bjoern, Robinson, Thorsten, LibreBaby, Michael S., Stephan, Eike * Completed Action Items: + review https://gerrit #/c/11700/ (Andras, Caolan, Cloph etc.) + acquired magic number from Redhat

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Minutes of ESC call: 2014-10-16

2014-10-17 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 10/17/2014 11:13 AM, Jan Holesovsky wrote: * LibreOffice 4.4 bibisects repo creation (Bjoern) + Bjoern creating, but Robinson should take over + but has time for that? - bugzilla migration a priority... (Bjoern) + Bjoern can do that at the time of the tag, but then is

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Minutes of ESC call: 2014-10-16

2014-10-17 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi, On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 11:47:30AM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: Would not the best thing to do be to do bibisect builds on the release baseline, as is done for the TDF builds? That way, the builds should work on as many machines as possible. As discussed explicitly in the call: I have

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Minutes of ESC call: 2014-10-16

2014-10-17 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 10/17/2014 12:12 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: Then again, as per: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/HowToBibisect#Manual_setup_.28download_a_tarball.29 there are currently _no_ reports of recent build being not universal. Fine then. (I've no experience consuming those bibisect

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Planing for 4.4.0 BH session

2014-10-17 Thread Sophie
Hi all, For information the wiki page is set. Cheers Sophie Le 16/10/2014 09:32, Sophie a écrit : Hi all, This is the proposed planing for 4.4.0beta1 the Bug Hunting session Planing is to have a BH session on Beta1 and RC1 Beta1 due date: Week 47 , Nov 17, 2014 - Nov 23, 2014

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Planing for 4.4.0 BH session

2014-10-17 Thread klaus-jürgen weghorn ol
Am 17.10.2014 um 13:59 schrieb Sophie: Hi all, For information the wiki page is set. https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugHunting_Session_4.4.0.0 -- Grüße k-j ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address:

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Minutes of ESC call: 2014-10-16

2014-10-17 Thread Terrence Enger
On Fri, 2014-10-17 at 12:12 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: Hi, Then again, as per: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/HowToBibisect#Manual_setup_.28download_a_tarball.29 there are currently _no_ reports of recent build being not universal. I have created a debian-sid chroot

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Minutes of ESC call: 2014-10-16

2014-10-17 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 11:01:51AM -0400, Terrence Enger wrote: I have created a debian-sid chroot environment to avoid complaints about old libraries from the bibisect versions. For example in debian-wheezy (i.e., stable), 43all version latest complains: The alpha1 bibisect update is already

[Libreoffice-qa] ping to retest old bugs

2014-10-17 Thread Aleksandr P
Hello. I believe that it is a good idea to check old bugs. 2014-10-16 23:00 GMT+04:00 bfoman bfo.bugm...@spamgourmet.com: Tommy wrote If they see the bug has gone they should mark as WORKSFORME if bug persist they should drop a note and leave status UNCHANGED if nobody answers we do nothing

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Minutes of ESC call: 2014-10-16

2014-10-17 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 11:13:12AM +0200, Jan Holesovsky wrote: + need a bugzilla query for the bugs that have been bisected to a single commit (Miklos) AI + can do that (Bjoern) + we have a keyword bisected, can use that for those with exact commit + done:

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ping to retest old bugs

2014-10-17 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi, On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 04:03:47AM +0200, Tommy wrote: your bug report has shown no activity in the last 6 months. newer LibO releases with hundred of bugifixes and new features have been releases meanwhile, so please retest with current LibO release (4.3.2.2) and give feedback of the

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ping to retest old bugs

2014-10-17 Thread Joel Madero
On 10/17/2014 11:16 AM, Aleksandr P wrote: Hello. I believe that it is a good idea to check old bugs. 2014-10-16 23:00 GMT+04:00 bfoman bfo.bugm...@spamgourmet.com: Tommy wrote If they see the bug has gone they should mark as WORKSFORME if bug persist they should drop a note and leave

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ping to retest old bugs

2014-10-17 Thread Robinson Tryon
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Aleksandr P alexpik...@gmail.com wrote: 2014-10-16 23:00 GMT+04:00 bfoman bfo.bugm...@spamgourmet.com: 1) If they see the bug has gone they should mark as WORKSFORME 2) if bug persist they should drop a note and leave status UNCHANGED 3) if nobody answers we do

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ping to retest old bugs

2014-10-17 Thread Joel Madero
Sounds great - so let's try to come up with a concrete plan that everyone (or most) sign off on and then just do a thumbs up or down vote. Let's try to not get too picky about the details. @Tommy - you mind giving a proposed consistent plan of attack? If you want me to briefly write something up

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ping to retest old bugs

2014-10-17 Thread Tommy
On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 00:30:52 +0200, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote: Sounds great - so let's try to come up with a concrete plan that everyone (or most) sign off on and then just do a thumbs up or down vote. Let's try to not get too picky about the details. @Tommy - you mind giving a

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ping to retest old bugs

2014-10-17 Thread Joel Madero
Okay - if you want I'll run this with my normal needinfo cleanup on the first of the month. How's that sound? Best, Joel On 10/17/2014 07:22 PM, Tommy wrote: On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 00:30:52 +0200, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote: Sounds great - so let's try to come up with a concrete