Hi Joel, Tommy,
Tommy píše v Pá 24. 10. 2014 v 22:22 +0200:
I suppose we shouldn't be sending these to EasyHacks - I guess it's
worth treating them separately :-) Is it possible to skip EasyHacks
when sending these, please?
What would be the rationale for skipping them for easy hacks?
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:18:04PM +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
But that's probably hard to do ATM, so I'd avoid any retest pings
there; or at least phrase them differently - in the Easy Hacks, the
pings shouldn't be about retesting, but more about the review of the
Easy Hack itself, because
On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 22:23:31 +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:18:04PM +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
But that's probably hard to do ATM, so I'd avoid any retest pings
there; or at least phrase them differently - in the Easy Hacks, the
