Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

2014-12-24 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi, On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 10:31:35PM +0100, Cor Nouws wrote: One thing that may be handled too: when confirming also check if it worked before (regression or not) and such. True. In the end a fully triaged (aka a bug that a QA guys can do nothing more about and that only can be moved forward

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

2014-12-24 Thread Cor Nouws
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote on 24-12-14 11:20: True. In the end a fully triaged (aka a bug that a QA guys can do nothing more about and that only can be moved forward by a developer) is either: [...] And confirming without checking if the bug is in one of the categories makes working with

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

2014-12-24 Thread Cor Nouws
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote on 24-12-14 11:20: and have a list of confirmed bugs that QA can still help about. As such Id suggest maybe a whiteboard status newfeaturebug for this. Opinions? Looks good. Thanks, Cor -- Cor Nouws GPD key ID: 0xB13480A6 - 591A 30A7 36A0 CE3C 3D28 A038 E49D 7365 B134

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

2014-12-24 Thread Robert Großkopf
Hi Bjoern, True. In the end a fully triaged (aka a bug that a QA guys can do nothing more about and that only can be moved forward by a developer) is either: 1/ a regression, which has been bibisected 2/ a non-regression, missing feature (enhancement) 3/ a non-regression, bug introduced

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

2014-12-24 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 12:13:57PM +0100, Robert Großkopf wrote: Hi Bjoern, True. In the end a fully triaged (aka a bug that a QA guys can do nothing more about and that only can be moved forward by a developer) is either: 1/ a regression, which has been bibisected 2/ a