duOn Sun, 12 Apr 2015 11:42:46 +0200, Tommy wrote:
Hi guys, as you may have noticed my QA activity has been almost close to
zero in the last few months.
I've been very busy at work and some familiar medical issues (which
fortunately seems going towards resolution) reduced drastically th
Probably not getting fixed before release of 5 if it's been around since
OOo times. Devs are focused on dealing with regressions right now - this
bug is quite old.
If there is a crash that needs to be reported separately, if that's a
regression, we can try to find someone to deal with it before re
please add it to the version dropdown menu
Tommy
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffi
Hi,
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 10:02:56AM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> It is clearly great to run 'make check' before pushing (just fixing
> some results from CI) - however, to assume that everyone has a 32 core
> machine (I have 4 not-so-strong cores) 32/4 * 2m -> 16m (not so far from
> 15 mi
Hi,
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 02:37:31AM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> ... brings 'make check' down to 2m6s on big Bertha. For comparison:
> [...]
> that is, just relinking (most) LibreOffice libs takes 2m26s on that machine
> without symbols (assume more than 10 minutes with symbols). Given thi
On Fri, 2015-05-29 at 02:37 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:40:40PM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> > And with this I see a lot of processes running parallel till the end. This
> > suggests to me that the stuff is quite parallelized -- however none of the
> > testing
