Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Keyword for ux-advise

[Joel Madero]

> Kendy felt it maybe difficult and wanted to know if it was possible to
> do this from the bugzilla end so that it would be automatic.
Probably easier solution is that 2 or 3 of you just monitor this link
routinely (has keyword, does not have UX in mailing list):

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/buglist.cgi?email1=libreoffice-ux-advise%40lists.freedesktop.org=1=notequals=needsUXEval_type=allwords_id=604822_format=advanced=---



Best,
Joel
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] NEW Ping latest run

[Joel Madero]

On 04/16/2016 12:44 AM, Tommy wrote:
> hi there, just a few minutes ago I did a new run of the NEW BUGS
> UNTOUCHED FROM MORE THAN 1 YEAR ping.
Thanks Tommy! I will *try* to write a blog post with a couple pretty
graphs/charts in about 3 weeksno promises, life is pretty hectic
right now. If you remember, ping me in 3 weeks to remind me :)


Best,
Joel
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Keyword for ux-advise

[Joel Madero]

On 04/17/2016 02:11 PM, Yousuf 'Jay' Philips wrote:
> maybe difficult and wanted to know if it was possible to
> do this from the bugzilla end so that it would be automatic.
Not by default - it would require some hacking of bugzilla.

___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Keyword for ux-advise

[Yousuf 'Jay' Philips]

Hey,

On 04/17/2016 08:53 PM, Joel Madero wrote:

Hi,


The design team would like a 'needsUXEval' keyword added to the
keywords field, so that ux-advise bugs can be assigned that keyword
instead of having ux-advise assigned in the component field, so for
example it would be easy to search bugs in Draw that require ux-advise.

Done


Thanks


QA members that would be assigning this new keyword rather than the
component should be aware that they would have to add the ux-advise
mailing list email to the CC list, as that isnt automatically being
set with the use of the keyword.

I doubt people will remember to do this - but, it's your workflow.


Kendy felt it maybe difficult and wanted to know if it was possible to 
do this from the bugzilla end so that it would be automatic.



Should I delete the component?


I wouldnt delete the component until all the entries set to ux-advise 
are changed to a more suitable component.



Best,
Joel


Regards,
Yousuf
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Keyword for ux-advise

[Joel Madero]

On 04/17/2016 08:13 AM, Yousuf 'Jay' Philips wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The design team would like a 'needsUXEval' keyword added to the
> keywords field, so that ux-advise bugs can be assigned that keyword
> instead of having ux-advise assigned in the component field, so for
> example it would be easy to search bugs in Draw that require ux-advise.
>
> QA members that would be assigning this new keyword rather than the
> component should be aware that they would have to add the ux-advise
> mailing list email to the CC list, as that isnt automatically being
> set with the use of the keyword.

Question: Are QA members still just pushing to NEW? Are we leaving in
UNCONFIRMED with some reasonable expectation that UX will tackle them?

Currently we just immediate toss the bug to NEW without confirming to
get them out of the UNCONFIRMED stack. Personally, I think that this is
preferred because without this QA members will: (1) be seeing these bugs
over and over again with no insight as to whether they are valid; (2)
New QA members might be confused and just push them to NEW and confirm
without knowing UX methods; (3) it might leads to QA members bickering
over the best UX practice when this is a job for UX, not QA.

Joel
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Check for update

[Christian Lohmaier]

Hi Pedro, *,

On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 6:06 PM, Pedro  wrote:
> Hi all
>
> While checking if bug #46354 was fixed I found an odd result
>
> If I use version
>
> Version: 5.1.2.1 (x64)
> Build ID: 2603b69c5ec5981bb5f053f8ebfd1f3de00a4c29
> […]
> and Check for Updates, I get "LibreOffice 5.1 is up to date."
> […]
> I'm puzzled that RC1 reports that it is up to date when 5.1.1.2 (and 5.1.1.3
> aka RC3 aka final 5.1.1 version) reports that 5.1.2 is already available.
>
> Is is possible that the server is reporting that the latest version
> available is 5.1.2.1?

Ah! thanks for testing and reporting - the info LO sends as the
user-agent was changed, but the check script wasn't adjusted properly,
so it doesn't recognize the request as coming from LibreOffice and
just errors out early.

ciao
Christian
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Keyword for ux-advise

[Joel Madero]

Hi,

> The design team would like a 'needsUXEval' keyword added to the
> keywords field, so that ux-advise bugs can be assigned that keyword
> instead of having ux-advise assigned in the component field, so for
> example it would be easy to search bugs in Draw that require ux-advise.
Done
>
> QA members that would be assigning this new keyword rather than the
> component should be aware that they would have to add the ux-advise
> mailing list email to the CC list, as that isnt automatically being
> set with the use of the keyword.
I doubt people will remember to do this - but, it's your workflow.

Should I delete the component?


Best,
Joel
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

[Libreoffice-qa] Check for update

[Pedro]

Hi all

While checking if bug #46354 was fixed I found an odd result

If I use version

Version: 5.1.2.1 (x64)
Build ID: 2603b69c5ec5981bb5f053f8ebfd1f3de00a4c29
CPU Threads: 4; OS Version: Windows 6.19; UI Render: GL; 
Locale: pt-PT (en_US)

and Check for Updates, I get "LibreOffice 5.1 is up to date."

However going back to 

Version: 5.1.1.2 (x64)
Build ID: fe4d9e69c82c6ee6db3c27cd5e2d47558afa80ac
CPU Threads: 4; OS Version: Windows 6.19; UI Render: GL; 
Locale: pt-PT (en_US)

returns the information
"LibreOffice 5.1.2 is available.

The installed version is LibreOffice 5.1.1.2"

I'm puzzled that RC1 reports that it is up to date when 5.1.1.2 (and 5.1.1.3
aka RC3 aka final 5.1.1 version) reports that 5.1.2 is already available.

Is is possible that the server is reporting that the latest version
available is 5.1.2.1?

Is there a simple way for a non-programmer to find out what the server is
reporting?




--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Check-for-update-tp4181351.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

[Libreoffice-qa] Keyword for ux-advise

[Yousuf 'Jay' Philips]

Hi All,

The design team would like a 'needsUXEval' keyword added to the keywords 
field, so that ux-advise bugs can be assigned that keyword instead of 
having ux-advise assigned in the component field, so for example it 
would be easy to search bugs in Draw that require ux-advise.


QA members that would be assigning this new keyword rather than the 
component should be aware that they would have to add the ux-advise 
mailing list email to the CC list, as that isnt automatically being set 
with the use of the keyword.


Yousuf
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] writing unit test for calc functions

[Raal]

On 16.4.2016 12:20, Markus Mohrhard wrote:



@QA team: Does this sound like something that would make it easier for
you to add tests for spreadsheet functions?



Hi Markus,
both variants are similarly arduous, so it's developer decision. If 
these new test will lead to easier incorporating of new tests, then +1 
from me. In fact it's only way, because we have not devs capacity for 
csv tests (you noted line endings (windows vs linux), string and number 
handling, rounding issues on the orcus and calc side, ...)



Regards
Raal



___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/