Hi Joel,
Le 09/05/2016 23:03, Joel Madero a écrit :
> I see what I did wrong. That being said, the few corner cases I'm not
> horribly concerned about (as the first example shows4+ months with
> no response).
I agree, 6 months with no response would be too long before closing.
That said for
I see what I did wrong. That being said, the few corner cases I'm not
horribly concerned about (as the first example shows4+ months with
no response). I'll be more careful next time - if I ever do it again.
Best,
Joel
On 05/09/2016 01:50 PM, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems
That would be my mistake. Apologies.
On 05/09/2016 01:50 PM, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems that the automatic cleaning of long standing NEEDINFO bug
> reports has itself some bug. Several bug reports in NEEDINFO state are
> closed as INVALID without warning comment and without a
Hi,
It seems that the automatic cleaning of long standing NEEDINFO bug
reports has itself some bug. Several bug reports in NEEDINFO state are
closed as INVALID without warning comment and without a sufficient
latence period.
For example:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68846
Hi QA team,
Some of you may have already seen our Month of LibreOffic campaign,
where we're encouraging community members to award each other barnstars
for their contributions:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Barnstars/2016-05
This campaign runs through May, and it would be awesome to
Dear Community,
The Document Foundation is pleased to announce the second release
candidate of LibreOffice 5.1.3. The upcoming 5.1.3 will be the third
bugfix release of our fresh 5.1 line. Please be aware that LibreOffice 5.1.3
RC2 has not been flagged as ready for production use yet, however
