[Libreoffice-qa] 7.0 bibisect repo

2020-05-09 Thread Terrence Enger
Hello, All, I notice on "QA/Bibisect/Linux" in the table under the heading "Versions", version number 6.5 has been changed to 7.0 but "Download links" still points to 6.5 . Is this really

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Ability to have Snap/Flatpak/etc. for bug hunting season

2020-05-09 Thread Dan Lewis
On 5/9/20 07:11, William Gathoye (LibreOffice) wrote: Hello everyone, While officially not in charge of LibreOfficeFR any more on Twitter, some people are requesting why we don't have Flatpak/Snap packages for prereleases versions as well? Some contributors aren't eager to test because

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Ability to have Snap/Flatpak/etc. for bug hunting season

2020-05-09 Thread antonio . faccioli
Il 09.05.2020 13:53 Ilmari Lauhakangas ha scritto: William Gathoye (LibreOffice) kirjoitti 9.5.2020 klo 14.11: Hello everyone, While officially not in charge of LibreOfficeFR any more on Twitter, some people are requesting why we don't have Flatpak/Snap packages for prereleases versions as

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Ability to have Snap/Flatpak/etc. for bug hunting season

2020-05-09 Thread Ilmari Lauhakangas
William Gathoye (LibreOffice) kirjoitti 9.5.2020 klo 14.11: Hello everyone, While officially not in charge of LibreOfficeFR any more on Twitter, some people are requesting why we don't have Flatpak/Snap packages for prereleases versions as well? Some contributors aren't eager to test because

[Libreoffice-qa] Ability to have Snap/Flatpak/etc. for bug hunting season

2020-05-09 Thread William Gathoye (LibreOffice)
Hello everyone, While officially not in charge of LibreOfficeFR any more on Twitter, some people are requesting why we don't have Flatpak/Snap packages for prereleases versions as well? Some contributors aren't eager to test because installing the current .deb/.rpm could interfere with their