bye, Tommy
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how
please test this one.
very easy and quick to triage.
Bug 92861 - AutoCorrect Options checkboxes do not work
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92861
IMHO is an important regression and breaks the autocorrect options
--
Using Opera's revolutionary email client:
RESOLVED bugs over 25K
check latest stats here: http://snipurl.com/2a3ne8c
the total FIXED count is almost 27000 if we include the CLOSED and
VERIFIED bugs as well.
so looking forward to break the 3 milestones.
congrats to all developers and triagers that made this possible,
bye,
in the last few weeks I was given Bugzilla admin power by Joel and I'm
adding new version once they come out and rename RCs to release once they
are promoted.
I think I could do some cleanups but I need your opinion first...
-
1 - remove the all versions
On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 18:49:43 +0200, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com
wrote:
On 07/26/2015 07:02 AM, Tommy wrote:
...
-
1 - remove the all versions items
-
actually we have 7 of those items for 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 4.0
On Fri, 24 Jul 2015 19:59:04 +0200, Christian Lohmaier
lohma...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi *,
for the upcoming new version 4.4.5 the builds for RC2 are now
available on pre-releases.
bugzilla 4.4.5.2 rc version item created
___
List Name:
please test this one under Linux and Mac using LibO 5.x
Bug 92774 - Can't add word to dictionary or use other options when list of
choices is very long and have to scroll
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92774
if the bug affects Linux as well it has to be bibisected
*bump*
Tommy wrote:
who's the correct person to ping looking at the following bibisect log?
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94955#c2
Bibisection result:
===
b827dce34450091ab3fd608fcb1774899cb2f865 is the first bad
Robinson Tryon wrote:
Hi all,
As mentioned in the ESC call, it could be helpful to add a new
Bugzilla Status that encompasses bugs that have been abandoned/don't
have enough data.
=> What type of bugs would this cover?
* User isn't willing to share private document with anyone, and we
can't
Michael Meeks wrote:
* Raw data for new metrics:
+ issues marked as 'highest' priority.
+ considered equivalent to MAB.
http://tdf.io/mab
I like the new table but I think it would be better to put the "total"
column just after the release column, and then the
Tommy wrote:
bfoman wrote:
Tommy wrote
I think knowing the list of the most duplicated bug reports would help
QA members to identify more duplicates once they are reported.
is this achievable?
Hi!
Yes, you can play with this site:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/duplicates.cgi
Best
bfoman wrote:
Tommy wrote
I think knowing the list of the most duplicated bug reports would help
QA members to identify more duplicates once they are reported.
is this achievable?
Hi!
Yes, you can play with this site:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/duplicates.cgi
Best regards
Robinson Tryon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The MAB docs on the wiki have been updated to reflect the new
> Priority-based system for categorizing bugs:
> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Most_Annoying_Bugs
I like very much the new scheme
I wonder if it's possible to have numbers close to the
who's the correct person to ping looking at the following bibisect log?
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94955#c2
Bibisection result:
===
b827dce34450091ab3fd608fcb1774899cb2f865 is the first bad commit
commit
Joel Madero wrote:
Hi All,
I wanted to know people's thoughts about dealing with bugs that we know
are caused by corrupt profiles. My suggestion:
NEW
with "corruptProfile" in the whiteboard. This is different from how it's
currently done as we close these as WFM. I'm happy to continue but if
Hi there,
is there any way we can obtain a Bugzilla query showing a list with the
bugs with the highest duplicates number?
an example is:
Bug 40534 - slide tearing in LARGE screens with hardware acceleration
enabled (11 dupes)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40534
I
an eye out for people doing it the old way out of habit for
at
least half a year
Im not saying its not possible, just that it is much more work and
hidden costs
that it might initially appear.
Best,
Bjoern
gardening is a much tougher work than it seems at first glance :-)
Tommy
On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 18:26:26 +0200, Christian Lohmaier
lohma...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi *,
for the upcoming new version 4.4.5 the builds for RC1 are now
available on pre-releases.
...
4.4.5.1 rc version added to Bugzilla.
___
List Name:
On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 13:56:50 +0200, Italo Vignoli it...@libreoffice.org
wrote:
On 02/07/15 06:23, Tommy wrote:
I need additional Linux and Mac testers with dual monitor setup for this
one:
Bug 91574 - SLIDESHOW: presenter console not shown and focus remains on
the secondary monitor
https
On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 11:38:02 +0200, Naruhiko Ogasawara naru...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Tommy, *
Just a quick look, what should be checked is playing slideshow
under the multi-window environment, as described in comment #3?
the current bug situation in Windows is described here:
https
Joel Madero wrote:
Hi All,
...
2) Ask the user to test their own bug - link to the page with old
releases
(http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/) - say
it helps a lot and it _could_ potentially help get the bug fixed faster;
...
Windows users can also use portable
Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
Test to see if the bug is still present in the latest supported
branch of LibreOffice (preferably 5.0.0.5 or later)
I'd like this one better
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address:
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Hi *,
for the upcoming new version 4.4.6 the builds for RC1 are now
available on pre-releases.
4.4.6.1 rc version field added to bugzilla
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address:
Joel Madero wrote:
Hi Tommy,
1- I still think that the 6 months EOL embargo before cleanup is too
much... It would be better to do the cleanup earlier, let's say 4 or 3
months after the EOL
I still disagree :) I don't see that many benefits and I see potential
issues that cause headaches
tems from the
version admin page. doing this we would get rid of 8 items from our long
version list.
feel free to discuss this in the QA mailing list or in the next QA
meeting... unfortunately I cannot be present in QA meetings because of
work and family issue, but I'm interested to know what othe
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Hello all,
For the upcoming version 5.0.4 the builds for RC2 are now available on
pre-releases.
...
bugzilla 5.0.4.2 rc item created too
Tommy
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa
Sophie wrote:
Hi all,
Is anybody interested on having access to a VNC server with daily builds
on Windows for testing or bibisecting?
Cheers
Sophie
Windows? i thought bibisect was only available on Linux.
Tommy
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa
Joel Madero wrote:
Hi All,
As long as the comment moving all to the maj.min version includes the
original version (or even adds it as a whiteboard item, I don't see
need for having the versions available.
Well the comment doesn't always have the version - more often than not
it doesn't. I'm
Pedro wrote:
Hi Tommy, all
Tommy wrote
1- I still think that the 6 months EOL embargo before cleanup is too
much... It would be better to do the cleanup earlier, let's say 4 or 3
months after the EOL
so leaving all those RCs in the list for such a long time still seems to
me just a waste
entify regression points.
Tommy
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lis
Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
Hi,
In the dropdown list of version, 5.1.3.2 rc is missing.
Could somebody with the ad-hoc permissions fix that?
Best regards.
JBF
somebody fixed it meanwhile. I see the 5.1.3.2 rc item now.
___
List Name:
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Dear Community,
The Document Foundation is pleased to announce the second release
candidate of LibreOffice 5.1.0.
...
bugzilla 5.1.0.2 rc item created
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address:
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Dear Community,
The Document Foundation is pleased to announce the first release
candidate of LibreOffice 5.0.5. The upcoming 5.0.5 will be the fourth
bugfix release of our fresh 5.0 line. Please be aware that LibreOffice
5.0.5 RC1 has not been flagged as ready for
Markus Mohrhard wrote:
Hey,
can we add a new keyword needUITest to bugs that are purely in the UI?
It would help me track bugs that can not be tested right now and would
need a test later.
Regards,
Markus
no objections from my side.
would you please dgive a couple of bugs that would
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Dear Community,
The Document Foundation is pleased to announce the second release
candidate of LibreOffice 5.1.3.
>
5.1.3.2 rc bugzilla version item created
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address:
the latest ping I did few minutes ago, 3595 bugs were pinged, of
those 803 turned from NEW to a RESOLVED status after being retested by
LibO users.
this means that after 1 year, 22,34% of reported bugs where somehow
fixed during continuous code development.
cheers, Tommy
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Hi *,
for the upcoming new version 5.2.5, the builds for RC1 are now
available on pre-releases.
...
the buglist is not yet published on the wiki
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/5.2.5/RC1
___
List Name:
have been yet published on the wiki...
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/5.3#5.3.0_release
both betas and rc links are still empty
Tommy
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change
Jan Iversen wrote:
The list of fixed bugs relative to 5.1.5 final (rc2) is here:
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/src/bugs-libreoffice-5-1-6-release-5.1.6.1.log
Object not found in my web browser.
___
List Name:
Xisco Fauli wrote:
Hello,
In order to give more visibility to the work QA is doing, I've just
created a new section in the QA wiki (
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Stats ) where I'll add some QA
stats based on Bugzilla.
nice initiative. thumbs up!!!
Tommy
Jay Philips wrote:
Hi All,
So i encourage all users to associate meta bugs to bug reports they
submit and triage and create a new meta bug if a suitable one isnt
available and they have seen enough similar bugs of a similar topic.
>
I've created many meta bugs over the last few
let's try to put it down to 500 by the end of the weekend!!!
Tommy
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Hi *,
for the upcoming new version 5.2.3, the builds for RC3 are now
available on pre-releases.
5.2.3 rc3 is in release-build configuration, meaning it will update a
previous version of LibreOffice
5.2.3 will be the third bugfix release for the fresh 5.2 codeline
Tommy wrote:
let's try to put it down to 500 by the end of the weekend!!!
Tommy
from 513 to 502 right now. good job guys.
a little small additional effort is needed to break the 500 wall.
Tommy
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail
hi Xisco,
just to make you aware that in the latest NEW mass ping the text message
says:
--- snip ---
Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version
of LibreOffice (5.1.6 or 5.2.3 https://www.libreoffice.org/download/
--- snip ---
the latest available release is
Hi Xisco,
what about editing the script in order to show links with "bit.ly" URLs
or other shortlink web services?
some huge URLs like:
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Hi *,
for the upcoming new version 5.3.2, the builds for rc2 are now
available on pre-releases.
It is release configuration, meaning it will update an existing
version of LibreOffice on Windows (linux and Mac users can install
alongside 5.2.x, but not run
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Hi *,
for the upcoming new version 5.3.1, the builds for rc2 are now
available on pre-releases.
...
Bugzilla "5.3.1.2 rc" version item just added
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address:
Xisco Fauli wrote:
Hello,
We're still getting spam:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/buglist.cgi?component=deletionrequest
I see... awful amount of rubbish...
---
Questa email è stata esaminata alla ricerca di virus da AVG.
http://www.avg.com
both tinderbox are not "baking" any fresh build to test...
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/libreoffice-5-4/Win-x86@62-TDF/
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/libreoffice-5-4/Win-x86_64@62-TDF/
please, take a look at it.
---
Questa email è stata esaminata alla ricerca di virus da
that the bughunt for n° 40K could be a funny
summer contest.
cheers, Tommy
---
Questa email è stata esaminata alla ricerca di virus da AVG.
http://www.avg.com
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change
please read this:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109280#c10
what an idiot...
cheers, Tommy
---
Questa email è stata esaminata alla ricerca di virus da AVG.
http://www.avg.com
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail
Tommy wrote:
Tommy wrote:
both tinderbox are not "baking" any fresh build to test...
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/libreoffice-5-4/Win-x86@62-TDF/
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/libreoffice-5-4/Win-x86_64@62-TDF/
please, take a look at it.
still no 5.4.x da
Xisco Fauli wrote:
Hello,
Right now we're at 39990 ( 37033 + 1458 + 1499 ), so we should reach the
milestone pretty soon :D
milestone has been broker sooner than expected...
total count right now is 40035 (37078 resolved + 1458 verified + 1499
closed).
good job!!!
Tommy
---
Questa
Tommy wrote:
both tinderbox are not "baking" any fresh build to test...
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/libreoffice-5-4/Win-x86@62-TDF/
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/libreoffice-5-4/Win-x86_64@62-TDF/
please, take a look at it.
still no 5.4.x daily builds
different numbers?
Tommy
---
Questa email è stata esaminata alla ricerca di virus da AVG.
http://www.avg.com
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org
Michael Meeks wrote:
* Release Engineering update (Christian)
+ 5.2.7 RC2
+ on the mirrors as a final version, but no official announce yet.
+ the last of the 5.2.x line planned.
5.2.7 RC1 changelog still missing here:
201 - 257 of 257 matches
Mail list logo
