Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOfficeDev 5.2.0 alpha1 test builds available

[MiguelAngelLO]

  
  
El 22/04/16 a las 10:40, Christian Lohmaier escribió:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 6:07 AM, V Stuart Foote
 wrote:
>> @Cloph, *
>>
>> Not sure what to make of it, and do hate to report it, but
seems the Windows
>> builds for 5.2.0alpha1, both x86 and x64, are affected by
packaging issue of
>> tdf#99285
  .
> 
> Well, so far only you could reproduce...

I can reproduce with 5.2x86 pre-release.
Comment in the bug report.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99258#c9

Now we are two. :)

Miguel Ángel.

> 
> ciao
> Christian

  

___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Excel key bindings for Calc

[MiguelAngelLO]

Hi Pedro,

El 29/02/16 a las 11:32, Pedro escribió:


Does Ctrl+; (insert current date) work for you? This is one of Excel's
function that I really miss. Maybe it doesn't work on my systems because I
use a Portuguese keyboard? If so then it's probably a bug?

I think the issue with Ctrl+; is with languages that need the Shift key 
for the semicolon, I have the same problem with Spanish. I don't know 
how many can be affected, and maybe other key combination have a similar 
issue.


https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88027
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93125

Miguel Ángel
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Revisiting BH (Bughunt) session organization

[MiguelAngelLO]

Hi Sophie, Cor, QA,

maybe defining a target for the sessions could help.

On one side, I think people are not waiting for a session to report the 
issues they find, in fact there are a lot of reports about 5.1.


On the other there is not a definite objective for the sessions.

IMHO sessions could be to analyze specifically the Release Notes.

I had done with the two first for 5.1, on the last holidays, now pending 
to report on the QA ML.


Here my draft of what I did:

*
Title:
Testing Release Notes 5.1 - Spelling dialog no longer automatically 
closes once spellcheck is complete. tdf#79312 (Marek Dolezel)


Release notes link: 
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/5.1#Writer


OS:Win10x64
Processor: IC i3 CPU M 330 @2.13GHz
Graphics:  AMD M Radeon HD 5000 v15.11

LibreOffice options:
- MemoryGraphics cache 48 MB
- OpenGLEnable.
Disable.
- OpenCLN/A
- Other N/A

Version: 5.1.0.0.beta2 (x64)
Build ID: 53054959a12edc6510f51b94ddc9b73d27aedaf6
Threads 4; Ver: Windows 6.19; Render: default;

Version master: 5.2.0.0.alpha0+ (x64)
Build ID: a454a9b3ae0f6ab81012fbef7b3ff6f0f44bf6cb
Threads 4; Ver: Windows 6.19; Render: default;
TinderBox: Win-x86_64@62-TDF, Branch:MASTER, Time: 2015-12-02_06:37:24

Test:
- With blank page
- Replacing several words
- Without words to replace.
- With a large file GS42-GettingStartedLO.odt

Test result:Ok.:)

Help:   - inner N/A
- net   N/A

Usability:  10/10
Overall evaluation: 08/10

Implications:   N/A.
Comments:   N/A.
*

Or perhaps something like this could be standardized in Moztrap, so we 
can have a better organize record.


The second fact is that devs if they like :), can follow the 
verification of their work, having a feedback about, from people who are 
not necessarily being devs, but usually with a certain level of 
acknowledgment on the use of LibreOffice.


Regards.
Miguel Ángel.

El 05/02/16 a las 9:03, Cor Nouws escribió:

Hi Sophie, all,

Sophie wrote on 04-02-16 14:02:


We would like to rethink the bug hunting sessions organization to make
them more attractive. The last ones were really too quiet with few
people joining.


Good that you ask! I've noticed the problem too.
No clear idea for a solution in mind yet, but let me start to explain
what we've seen over the past years.
With the first (few) bughunt sessions there was a clear energy among the
QA volunteers. Because is was new, there was the feeling of urgency,
excitement and so on. And it was new to the general public and media
too. So there was a great coverage.
Now it's not new, maybe some people have the feeling that getting a bit
more rest is more urgent then doing a bit more QA work, there is no
feeling of urgency. It's a PR, that we know will be there 6 times a year...


What would be your ideas?
Cloph already proposed to have them on one day only. Would Friday be the
good day?


Thinking of a new form is good. And maybe even more.
What pops up in my mind now: imagine that the ESC defines a area in
product, that could benefit from a tender to get bugs solved and that
the board puts, say, 100 k in (I realize there are some constraints
around that, but expect that could be solved). Such a project would
probably benefit from a careful clean up and further testing of bugs in
that area. So that would be new and have a new appealing goal.

Anyway: the regular form doesn't work any more. So maybe with each new
release define a goal (announce something related to new features for
example), and find a different or related form?

Look forward to what others think,
Ciao,
Cor


___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Drop-down boxes are broken for the whole LibreOffice.

[MiguelAngelLO]

  
  
El 05/12/15 a las 0:38, Robinson Tryon escribió:

  On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Pedro  wrote:

  
Robinson Tryon wrote


  As mentioned previously, we're no longer using Severity: 'blocker' to
mark bugs. Please set those bugs to 'critical' severity.


May I suggest that you migrate all "blockers" to "critical" and remove the
"blocker" option from the list?

  
  We've migrated all open blockers to critical (migrating the
resolved/closed bugs was deemed more disruptive than helpful).
Renaming 'blocker' was proposed and then postponed, as the 'blocker'
label is threaded extensively through the Bugzilla codebase, and
patches to remove it would complicate upgrades. It's possible that we
could remove the option *solely* in the drop-down display when
editing, if that would be considered helpful for new bug reporters.

See docs on Severity field here:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Severity#Severity_Levels


  
It is useless, causes confusion/illusion and is a waste of time both to
reporters and triagers.

  
  Ideally, all triagers should be in the 'contributors' Bugzilla group
and should hopefully be aware of current best practices regarding
Severity and Priority. I just made additional updates to the
Prioritization flowchart mentioned in our Bug Triage docs to clarity
the deprecation of 'blocker', reflect the relative position of the
Importance fields (Priority, Severity) in the Bugzilla bug-editing
interface, and change the term 'Wishlist' to 'Enhancement' (to reflect
the actual terms used):
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/BugTriage#Step_7._Prioritize_Bug

Best,
--R



Ok, clear for me.
Please forgive the noise.

Regards.
Miguel Ángel.
  

___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/