Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ESC meeting agenda: 2023-09-28 16:00 CEST
Hi Eyal, Eyal Rozenberg schrieb am 27.09.2023 um 19:31: Hello ESC, I would like to ask you to discuss the situation with the recent CVE: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157231 I'm not the ESC, but please notice https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/announce/msg00392.html Kind regards, Regina
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ESC meeting agenda: 2021-12-09 16:00 Berlin time
Hi Miklos, Miklos Vajna schrieb am 08.12.2021 um 16:37: * Pending Action Items: + reach out to Regina regarding the ODF tender spec (Michael S) Michael Stahl has contacted me. I had already a list of about 80 relevant bugs from my comment on the tender. I have agreed and already started to look through them, but I will need at least a week. In case you are interested in an intermediate status, I can sent you a list of the bugs, some of them already commented. Kind regards Regina
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ESC meeting agenda - Adding topic: Broken release process when fresh become still and when still become EOL'ed
Hi Timur, Timur Gadzo schrieb am 28.01.2021 um 19:56: On Thursday, January 28, 2021, Florian Effenberger mailto:flo...@documentfoundation.org>> wrote: > > William Gathoye (LibreOffice) wrote on 27.01.21 at 18:22: > >> Right now: 6.4 is EOL'ed[4] but it is still advertised on the website while the update service is redirecting users of 6.4 to the 7.0 version. > > I think it is intentional that we always do have two parallel versions available for download, but it's something that might change as we are looking into the rolling release system, which makes this differentiation obsolete. > Hi Still has a purpose, many users (me also) are using Still.last. So we need 6.4 to be on the webpage, until we get 7.0.last. Removing it from that website does not mean, that you cannot get it. You can get every former released version from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old But those versions will get no bugfixes at all. Especially they will get no security bug fixes. I do not understand your problem. You should already have 6.4.7 and there will never be a 6.4.8. So why do you need a download link at that website? Kind regards Regina ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
[Libreoffice-qa] How to handle spam in existing bug reports?
Hi all, we get frequently comments with spam to existing bugs. How do treat those comments? Kind regards Regina ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Call for testing: LibreOffice 5.4.0.3-hotfix
Hi, I have tested pre-release Version: 5.4.0.3 Build-ID: 7556cbc6811c9d992f4064ab9287069087d7f62c and LODev Version: 6.0.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: 343d40206a929969e1755b073edae91cc4bd9751 The error of bug 109281 is gone, text and images are printed. I have used printer "MS Office Document Image Writer", "MS XPS Document Writer" and real printer "Epson WP-4025" on Windows 7. I cannot test bug 107166, because OpenGL needs to be disabled on my PC. Kind regards Regina Xisco Fauli schrieb: Hello, The builds for 5.4.0.3 has been now replaced by new builds containing the fix tdf#109281 [1], which was a critical bug discover in LibreOffice 5.4.0.3 this week. I would like to ask everyone, specially those with a Windows environment, to download the new builds and test that tdf#109281 [1] is fixed and it doesn't cause any other problem, specially those related with the text rendering on printing (tdf#109281 [1]) and the text rendering on the UI( tdf#107166 [2]). You can download the new builds from http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/ Regards [1] https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109281 [2] https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107166 ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Invalid ODF
Hi, Michael Stahl schrieb: On 03.04.2017 20:21, Regina Henschel wrote: Hi all, does a meta issue exists for those bugs, where LibreOffice writes invalid ODF? Or is there a way to mark such bugs in a consistent way? hi Regina, there are 2 words you can put in whiteboard: The Whiteboard field is not available when creating an issue. "odf" -> this is any ODF interop issue "odf_validation" -> this is narrowly defined as something that an ODF validator complains about I do not find any description. I have looked at https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Whiteboard and https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Whiteboard/Inactive and https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Whiteboard/Advanced I do not belong to the QA-team, but I write a lot of bug reports and comments. So it would be nice to get an "official" description. of course, not every invalid ODF issue is detectable by a validator... perhaps the separate keyword odf_validation exists because these issues are often quite easy to fix :) Kind regards Regina ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
[Libreoffice-qa] Invalid ODF
Hi all, does a meta issue exists for those bugs, where LibreOffice writes invalid ODF? Or is there a way to mark such bugs in a consistent way? Kind regards Regina ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [libreoffice-design] Minutes of the Design Hangout: 2016-Aug-05
Hi Heiko, Heiko Tietze schrieb: Date:2016-Aug-05 Present: Jay, Heiko, Cor, Mahfiaz * Area Fill (Rishabh/Heiko) * Aug-05 + New section switcher + Try to replace the buttons by something different (Heiko) + Remove None from the available fill styles (now sections) + Pro: None means transparency of 100%, and now we just define a solid color (Heiko) + Con: Setting to a transparent color will cause problems when users which the fill type (Jay, Rishabh) The fill style "NONE" is different from "SOLID + 100% transparency" and has to be retained. (1) You see the difference, when you use style inheritance. If you set the color to "yellow" in the child, you will indeed get yellow in case the parent has FillStyle="NONE" and the child will be transparent in case the parent has "SOLID + 100% transparency". (2) When you use area fill for paragraph background, then you get interoperability problems, because other applications (I have tested AOO4.2 and Word 2010) do not get the transparency for paragraph background correctly, but interpret FillStyle "NONE" correctly. (3) If a search for attributes will be implemented, then FillStyle="None" is surely different from "SOLID + 100%transparency". (4) You need "NONE" anyway, because "NONE" is value of enum FillStyle in the API. Kind regards Regina ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 5.1.0 RC1 available
Hi Cor, Cor Nouws schrieb: Christian Lohmaier wrote on 18-12-15 01:20: http://www.libreoffice.org/download/pre-releases/ Hurray :) Now we need a qtz "langpack", reveling the String ID's to check (recent) translations. However - apologies - I lost track on where I can find the most recent. Anyone? I think, they are here http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/libreoffice-5-1/Win-x86@62-merge-TDF/current/ Kind regards Regina ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Drop-down boxes are broken for the whole LibreOffice.
Hi, m.a.riosv schrieb: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83904 reported by Beluga. Can someone test, seems for the whole daily builds 5.x and for the whole LibreOffice drop-down boxes are broken. List selection is displayed, but the selection it's not applied neither change in the box. If it is, should be changed to blocker, I can only put it as critical. https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96118 and https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96119 Mit freundlichen Grüßen Regina ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Idea: Issues assign to me
Hi, Xisco Faulí schrieb: Hi all, Do you think it would be plausible to have a link in bugzilla's menu to quickly check the issues assign to oneself like the link 'My bugs'? Right now, the only way I found to check this is in 'Advanced Search' - Custom Search - Assignee equals to 'user' which IMHO, is quite tedious. You define this query once and then save it as named query. It will show up as link in the grey area on the start screen. On the other hand, I found that taking an issue doesn't change the status to ASSIGNED. Could bugzilla be hacked to do it automatically or it's intentioned? You clicked on the link "take" in the line "Assigned To" and that does not work? Please look into your account in tab "Permissions", whether you have the permission for assigning a bug. Kind regards Regina ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Fwd: LibreOffice underline problem
Hi, sooraj kenoth schrieb: Hi all, While using the LibreOffice, I have some problems with the the underline. In Malayalam we have a lot of stacked characters. In the current way of drawing underline, it strikes the stacked letters. It is annoying and it kills the legibility. Please find the screen-shot here https://www.libreoffice.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=102053 Underline goes through the descenders of some western characters too. Therefore Underline in this way is considered as bad typography. You should ban it totally. I have reported the bug here. But they didn't accept. I don't know what to do. https://www.libreoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80724 There exist already a better solution. When you open the character formatting dialog, you will see a tab borders. There you can draw a bottom border to the characters. If that does not work for your Malayalam characters, it would be worth a bug report. Kind regards Regina ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ODF compatibility tests
Hi Jay, Jay Philips schrieb: Hi All, I was curious what compatibility tests are being run to ensure that LibO displays ODF accurately. There exists no reference implementation for ODF. I had asked a similar question a few days back on the LibO QA mailing list but never got a response. Is there an archive of standard compliant odf 1.0/1.1 and 1.2 files that is available? Alternatively, is there an ODF test to validate if a ODF file outputted by an ODF compatible software complies to the ODF standard and can output the file as a pdf to show how it should be rendered, somewhat similar to the Acid test for CSS. Please keep in mind, that LibreOffice writes ODF1.2 extended as default. That contains more than currently specified in ODF1.2. Likely not all, but the most differences are documented in https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/ODF_Implementer_Notes As part of my extensive testing of .docx files in LibO, i'm currently testing ODF outputted by LibO to see how well its imported into Word 2010 and 2013, as well as testing ODF outputted by Word 2010 and 2013 to see how well its imported into LibO. It would be nice to have a ODF software that i could use its output as a reference to compare these results against, as i've found ODF outputted by word 2010 that doesnt open correctly in LibO but did in Calligra Words and i've also found ODF files on libreoffice.org that displayed differences in LibO 4.1 and 4.2. Currently if a .doc, .docx or .rtf loads different between LibO and ms word, i report these bugs, but if there are load differences for .odt files its difficult to know if its a LibO or ms word problem. Perhaps validator http://odf-validator2.rhcloud.com/odf-validator2/ or http://officeshots.org/ might help. For MS Word you should consider the information from Microsoft as well. http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=20601 The normative reference is the spec itself. https://www.oasis-open.org/standards#opendocumentv1.2 If you cannot resolve it using the spec, you can write to opendocument-us...@lists.oasis-open.org, or if you can already point to the place where something is not precise enough specified write to office-comm...@lists.oasis-open.org. Or write an issue about the difference and attach a small(!) test document. Some people here are involved in the OASIS OpenDocument TC. Kind regards Regina ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [Math] Clicking in Formular does not let the cursor change its position in the main part
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Hackert schrieb:
Hello @ll,
as I am testing http://manual-test.libreoffice.org/runtests/run/57/env/642/ in
MozTrap right now,
I followed the following instruction there
quote
1. * Open a new Formula document using File New Formula
* Enter formula values in the input frame as: lllint from{1}
to{x} (1 over sum from {k j} (d_(j)+arccot(nroot{32 }X^{11})))+1
there should be the mathematical formula you input displayed in the
main area
2. Click on around the rendered formula symbol in the main area
the cursor jumps to the corresponding character in the input frame
3. ...
/quote
. If I copy this formular to Math, then click on the formular in the
main window, I cannot see the cursor jumping to its corresponding
position ... :( Is it only on my system? Or can anyone else with a
different OS/architecture confirm this? Or is this an error in the
test description?
Do you have enabled experimental feature? Then you get the new way to
enter formulas and that way has no formula cursor.
Kind regards
Regina
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Writer: Use of different items for Formatting Marks
Hi Jochen, Jochen schrieb: Hi *, in bugreport 45588 [1] is discussed following problem concerning writer: Use of different items for Formatting Marks (in German Localization). My proposal to solve the problem is 1) Clarify what are the correct terms in English 2) Clarify if terms are in english UI and help of LO entered correctly 3) Clarify what are the correct terms in German 4) Localisation in German I want to discuss the two first steps on this ML: 1) Clarify what are the correct terms in English 2) Clarify if terms are in english UI and help of LO entered correctly I propose to use in English always the terms of the Unicode specification, see http://unicode.org/charts English Wikipedia: Non-breaking space Unicode: U+00A0 In English also known as: No-break space, non-breakable space, NBSP, hard space, fixed space Terms used in English UI and LO Help: non-breaking space, protected space Proposal for LO, English: None-breaking space NO-BREAK SPACE or its common abbreviation NBSP English Wikipedia: Non-breaking hyphen Unicode: U+2011 Terms used in Englich UI and LO Help: non-breaking hyphen, non-breaking dash, protected hyphen, non-breaking (protected) hyphen Proposal for LO, English: Non-breaking hyphen NON-BREAKING HYPHEN English Wikipedia: Soft hyphen Unicode: U+00AD Terms used in English UI and Help: optional hyphen, custom hyphen, definite separator, conditional separator, user-defined delimiter Proposal for LO, English: Soft hyphen SOFT HYPHEN or its common abbreviation SHY Translating to German is a different problem, because there exists no normative translation of the Unicode standard. The discussion is old, see https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=39762 Kind regards Regina ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Writer: Use of different items for Formatting Marks
Hi Jochen, Jochen schrieb: Hi Regina, do you have an overview, if in LO the terms NO-BREAK SPACE, NO-BREAK SPACE and SOFT HYPHEN are used consistently? No, I have no overview about the use of the terms. In addition to the terms which are 'correct' in regard to Unicode, terms are often used in the same wording as they occur in MS Office. Exits a QA-document (e.g. in Wiki) where this is written/noted? I don't know, whether such a document exists. Long time ago, the attempt to start an UI review, was not successful. Kind regards Regina ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] tester wanted: Base and Access
Hi Jochen, Jochen schrieb: Hi, for bugreport [1] a tester is required. The bugreport refers to Base concerning editing Access-files (Access 2007/2010). Who can help? [1] https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43187 I had made some tests in Sept.2007 http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Connecting_to_Microsoft_Access There I found, that ADO gives only read access to the table, you need to setup an ODBC connection. I don't know, whether Access 2007 uses ADO and whether it is intended to give write access to the tables. A quick test with LO 3.6 using type Access 2007 results in missing SDBC driver. So the database could not be opened at all. A connection with ODBC works in LO 3.6 and the tables are writeable. Kind regards Regina ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
