Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: wrong NEEDINFO / INVALID cleaning

2016-05-09 Thread Jean-Baptiste Faure
Hi Joel, Le 09/05/2016 23:03, Joel Madero a écrit : > I see what I did wrong. That being said, the few corner cases I'm not > horribly concerned about (as the first example shows4+ months with > no response). I agree, 6 months with no response would be too long before closing. That said for

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: wrong NEEDINFO / INVALID cleaning

2016-05-09 Thread Joel Madero
I see what I did wrong. That being said, the few corner cases I'm not horribly concerned about (as the first example shows4+ months with no response). I'll be more careful next time - if I ever do it again. Best, Joel On 05/09/2016 01:50 PM, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: > Hi, > > It seems

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: wrong NEEDINFO / INVALID cleaning

2016-05-09 Thread Joel Madero
That would be my mistake. Apologies. On 05/09/2016 01:50 PM, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: > Hi, > > It seems that the automatic cleaning of long standing NEEDINFO bug > reports has itself some bug. Several bug reports in NEEDINFO state are > closed as INVALID without warning comment and without a

[Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: wrong NEEDINFO / INVALID cleaning

2016-05-09 Thread Jean-Baptiste Faure
Hi, It seems that the automatic cleaning of long standing NEEDINFO bug reports has itself some bug. Several bug reports in NEEDINFO state are closed as INVALID without warning comment and without a sufficient latence period. For example: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68846