2011.11.15 10:42, Petr Mladek rašė:
> Rimas Kudelis píše v Po 14. 11. 2011 v 21:53 +0200:
>>> I have described how to contribute a test case at
>>> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Test_Cases_Contribution
>>>
>>> It allows both ways: wiki page and mailing list.
>> Petr, did you accoun
Rimas Kudelis píše v Po 14. 11. 2011 v 21:53 +0200:
> > I have described how to contribute a test case at
> > https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Test_Cases_Contribution
> >
> > It allows both ways: wiki page and mailing list.
>
> Petr, did you account for the fact the the initial assum
Hi,
On 2011.11.14 16:27, Petr Mladek wrote:
> Sophie Gautier píše v Pá 04. 11. 2011 v 17:13 +0100:
>> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Petr Mladek wrote:
>>> Sophie Gautier píše v Čt 03. 11. 2011 v 21:30 +0100:
The best way for the moment, would be to add the tests on the wiki and
and a
Sophie Gautier píše v Pá 04. 11. 2011 v 17:13 +0100:
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > Sophie Gautier píše v Čt 03. 11. 2011 v 21:30 +0100:
> >> The best way for the moment, would be to add the tests on the wiki and
> >> and admin to add them to Litmus. I know it's less eas
Petr Mladek píše v Po 07. 11. 2011 v 11:58 +0100:
> Rimas Kudelis píše v So 05. 11. 2011 v 11:13 +0200:
> > With just two SQL queries I have just created a new group
> > called 'LibreOffice product administrators' and associated it with
> > LibreOffice product. As a member of that group, I can now
Hi Petr,
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 11:58:10AM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> Rimas Kudelis píše v So 05. 11. 2011 v 11:13 +0200:
> > OK, this appears to have been easier than I thought. It seems like the
> > functionality is already in Litmus, but simply not exposed in Litmus
> > admin UI. With just tw
Rimas Kudelis píše v So 05. 11. 2011 v 11:13 +0200:
> OK, this appears to have been easier than I thought. It seems like the
> functionality is already in Litmus, but simply not exposed in Litmus
> admin UI. With just two SQL queries I have just created a new group
> called 'LibreOffice product adm
Rimas Kudelis píše v So 05. 11. 2011 v 09:55 +0200:
> 2011.11.04 08:56, Yifan Jiang rašė:
> > On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 05:32:03PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 14:32 +0800, Yifan Jiang wrote:
> >>> IMHO we may make the access more open at least with the problems resolved:
> >>
Hi Petr,
The frequent change of feature test cases would be perfectly supported by our
current Litmus testing strategy.
Saying a feature branch, from which a test run is created, a new test case
created in that branch would reflect immediately to that test run :)
A generic (not version specific)
Hi Rimas,
I have got it a try and it simply works as expected! :) Thanks
a lot for your great work!
Best wishes,
Yifan
On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 11:13:14AM +0200, Rimas Kudelis wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> 2011.11.05 09:55, Rimas Kudelis rašė:
> > 2011.11.04 08:56, Yifan Jiang rašė:
> >> On Thu
Hi again,
2011.11.05 09:55, Rimas Kudelis rašė:
> 2011.11.04 08:56, Yifan Jiang rašė:
>> On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 05:32:03PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 14:32 +0800, Yifan Jiang wrote:
IMHO we may make the access more open at least with the problems resolved:
Hi all and sorry for a bit late reply,
2011.11.04 08:56, Yifan Jiang rašė:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 05:32:03PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
>> On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 14:32 +0800, Yifan Jiang wrote:
>>> IMHO we may make the access more open at least with the problems resolved:
>>>
>>> 1. At the mo
On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 17:13 +0100, Sophie Gautier wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > There must be many people around that would want to help with testing.
> > Every localization team team had its own testers. We need to encourage
> > them. I think that the feature fr
Hi Petr,
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Petr Mladek wrote:
> Sophie Gautier píše v Čt 03. 11. 2011 v 21:30 +0100:
>> As you know Litmus was only a default choice because we didn't find
>> anything better that could fit our needs. There is a new tool
>> developed by the Mozilla Foundation, but i
Sophie Gautier píše v Čt 03. 11. 2011 v 21:30 +0100:
> As you know Litmus was only a default choice because we didn't find
> anything better that could fit our needs. There is a new tool
> developed by the Mozilla Foundation, but it won't be available before
> some time from what I know. However, R
Yifan Jiang píše v Pá 04. 11. 2011 v 14:56 +0800:
> The feature branch has no difference with regresstion test branch, so if
> the
> Test Run Admin works as I expected, it will not be a problem.
I would expect more frequent changes in the feature branch. We have new
features every week.
Hello Rimas,
Would you help share your ideas of the following point 1 and 2? Thanks!
Hello Petr,
The feature branch has no difference with regresstion test branch, so if the
Test Run Admin works as I expected, it will not be a problem.
I think Sophie's comments of creating test
Hi all,
Sorry to jump so late in the discussion
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 14:32 +0800, Yifan Jiang wrote:
>> IMHO we may make the access more open at least with the problems resolved:
>>
>> 1. At the moment, the only user group can edit testca
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 14:32 +0800, Yifan Jiang wrote:
> IMHO we may make the access more open at least with the problems resolved:
>
> 1. At the moment, the only user group can edit testcases is the
> Litmus Super Admin, which has an access to manage everything including
> other people
Hi drew,
Sorry I forgot to ask if you will add a Regression test case or New Feature
test cases? For 3.4 New Feature test cases, we should put them in branch 3.4
Feature test.
To make it less confusing, let me clarify that we usually have 3 separate
branches available for populating test cases:
On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 00:36 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> Hi Drew, *,
>
> (@Drew - sorry for sending twice, forgot about the missing
> reply-to-list/need to use reply-to-all)
>
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 12:32 AM, drew wrote:
> >> [http://tcm.documentfoundation.org]
> >
> > Thanks for the hel
Hi Drew, *,
(@Drew - sorry for sending twice, forgot about the missing
reply-to-list/need to use reply-to-all)
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 12:32 AM, drew wrote:
>> [http://tcm.documentfoundation.org]
>
> Thanks for the help and with same I've read over some of the existing
> test scenarios - up till
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 00:36 -0600, Yi Fan Jiang wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 03:30:31PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > drew píše v Út 01. 11. 2011 v 10:02 -0400:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I would like to start using the Litmus test case server, specifically
> > > for entering some Base related manu
On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 03:30:31PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> drew píše v Út 01. 11. 2011 v 10:02 -0400:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to start using the Litmus test case server, specifically
> > for entering some Base related manual tests.
> >
> > I've created my account at
> > https://tcm.docum
drew píše v Út 01. 11. 2011 v 13:00 -0400:
> Well, just to be sure - while waiting on that
I hope that we might give you the needed rights in Litmus within one
day. If it does not happen, we need to improve the processes for the
future.
> I suppose it makes sense to add what I have to the wiki p
On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 15:30 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> drew píše v Út 01. 11. 2011 v 10:02 -0400:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to start using the Litmus test case server, specifically
> > for entering some Base related manual tests.
> >
> > I've created my account at
> > https://tcm.documentfoun
drew píše v Út 01. 11. 2011 v 10:02 -0400:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to start using the Litmus test case server, specifically
> for entering some Base related manual tests.
>
> I've created my account at
> https://tcm.documentfoundation.org/
> but can not seem to find a way to enter a test scenario.
Hi,
I would like to start using the Litmus test case server, specifically
for entering some Base related manual tests.
I've created my account at
https://tcm.documentfoundation.org/
but can not seem to find a way to enter a test scenario.
Any help would be much appreciated.
Thanks
//drew
28 matches
Mail list logo
