On Sun, 2012-02-05 at 18:35 -0500, drew wrote: > Hi, > > Noticed on slashdot today that someone was complaining about LibreOffice > not being willing to deal with their bug report because they had a > document [edit] with confidential information [/edit]
> showing the defect (I looked at the issue and suspect it may > actually be a duplicate BTW) and according to this individual he was > told that there was no way for TDF/LibreOffice QA to handle such a > document. > > I've been around the block enough times not to take this at face value > necessarily, but I was wondering about it - I thought there had been > some work done, procedure wise and even ML wise just for this type of > situation. > > Anyway - I thought about responding to the person on slashdot but > thought it best to touch base here first. > > Thanks much, > > //drew _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
