On 03.04.2017 22:37, Michael Stahl wrote:
> On 03.04.2017 21:59, Regina Henschel wrote:
>> Michael Stahl schrieb:
>>> "odf" -> this is any ODF interop issue
>>>
>>> "odf_validation" -> this is narrowly defined as something that an ODF
>>> validator complains about
>>
>> I do not find any
d Whiteboard values.
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Invalid-ODF-tp4211700p4211710.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address:
On 03.04.2017 21:59, Regina Henschel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Michael Stahl schrieb:
>> On 03.04.2017 20:21, Regina Henschel wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> does a meta issue exists for those bugs, where LibreOffice writes
>>> invalid ODF? Or is there a way to mark such bugs in a consistent way?
>>
>> hi
Hi,
Michael Stahl schrieb:
On 03.04.2017 20:21, Regina Henschel wrote:
Hi all,
does a meta issue exists for those bugs, where LibreOffice writes
invalid ODF? Or is there a way to mark such bugs in a consistent way?
hi Regina,
there are 2 words you can put in whiteboard:
The Whiteboard
On 03.04.2017 20:21, Regina Henschel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> does a meta issue exists for those bugs, where LibreOffice writes
> invalid ODF? Or is there a way to mark such bugs in a consistent way?
hi Regina,
there are 2 words you can put in whiteboard:
"odf" -> this is any ODF interop issue
oard "odf" and/or "odf_validate";
and Keyword "filter:odf"
Stuart
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Invalid-ODF-tp4211700p4211703.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Hi all,
does a meta issue exists for those bugs, where LibreOffice writes
invalid ODF? Or is there a way to mark such bugs in a consistent way?
Kind regards
Regina
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address:
