Excellent! Thank you all for the answers ;)
Now onto some real bug swatting :)
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Pro
Hi Pedro, *,
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Pedro Lino wrote:
> [...]
> It was my mistake. I mixed results, But you can see that for Win
> machine #6 the current error number is 375 and the previous successful
> build had 176
> http://tinderbox.libreoffice.org/cgi-bin/tinder.cgi?tree=MASTER&star
2011/12/1 Pedro Lino :
>>> So if Tinderbox #9 finished successfully 2 days ago with 176 errors
>>> and today with 846(!!!), doesn't that sound suspicious?
>
>> Yes, it does - but only if it is the same machine, the same builder.
>> In your initial post you were comparing different builders, and the
>> So if Tinderbox #9 finished successfully 2 days ago with 176 errors
>> and today with 846(!!!), doesn't that sound suspicious?
> Yes, it does - but only if it is the same machine, the same builder.
> In your initial post you were comparing different builders, and there
> it is rather irrelevant
Hi Pedro, *,
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Pedro Lino wrote:
>
>>> I.e. does the number of errors
>>> potentially affect the quality and reliability of the binaries?
>>
>> Not necessarily. But it would be suspicious if for example the Mac
>> ones that are below 10 "errors" suddenly spike to 50
Hi Christian
>> I.e. does the number of errors
>> potentially affect the quality and reliability of the binaries?
>
> Not necessarily. But it would be suspicious if for example the Mac
> ones that are below 10 "errors" suddenly spike to 50 or more and still
> be green. Then it is worth to have a l
On 12/01/2011 09:51 AM, Pedro Lino wrote:
One question: the MinGW finished with 220 errors while on 11-30 it
managed to build with 16 errors; the MSVC Win_9 machine finished
successfully with 846(!) errors but the previous successful build was
managed by Win_6 with "only" 176 errors.
Is it a reg
Hi guys
I'm glad to see that the Win Tinderboxes are finishing successfully again.
One question: the MinGW finished with 220 errors while on 11-30 it
managed to build with 16 errors; the MSVC Win_9 machine finished
successfully with 846(!) errors but the previous successful build was
managed by W
