Re: [Libreoffice-qa] URGENT Cherry pick regressions to next release

2013-07-09 Thread Markus Mohrhard
> Markus Mohrhard wrote >> * Does the fix contain a new feature? >> * How important is the bug fix? >> * Is the fix safe enough for a stable branch? >> * How much did the code change between the two versions? > > Points 1 and 2: if it's a regression it's not new and it's EXTREMELY > important not t

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] URGENT Cherry pick regressions to next release

2013-07-08 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi, On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 05:18:05PM -0700, Pedro wrote: > > * Is the fix safe enough for a stable branch? > > * How much did the code change between the two versions? > Point 3: that is why it needs to be checked by 3 devs > Point 4: that should not be relevant. If the regression is already fix

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] URGENT Cherry pick regressions to next release

2013-07-08 Thread Pedro
Hi Markus Markus Mohrhard wrote > * Does the fix contain a new feature? > * How important is the bug fix? > * Is the fix safe enough for a stable branch? > * How much did the code change between the two versions? Points 1 and 2: if it's a regression it's not new and it's EXTREMELY important not

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] URGENT Cherry pick regressions to next release

2013-07-08 Thread Markus Mohrhard
Hey, 2013/7/8 Pedro : > Andras Timar-3 wrote >> It is in the review queue for 4.1.0: >> https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/4738/ > > Excellent! But it would make sense to let people know about that in > Bugzilla? > > In Bugzilla you only get Whiteboard: BSA target:4.2.0 target:4.1.1 > > In any cas

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] URGENT Cherry pick regressions to next release

2013-07-07 Thread Pedro
Andras Timar-3 wrote > It is in the review queue for 4.1.0: > https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/4738/ Excellent! But it would make sense to let people know about that in Bugzilla? In Bugzilla you only get Whiteboard: BSA target:4.2.0 target:4.1.1 In any case, that was an example. I meant this (

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] URGENT Cherry pick regressions to next release

2013-07-07 Thread Andras Timar
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Pedro wrote: > Here is an example that will cause DATA LOSS for any user of 4.1.0 (it was > cherry picked to 4.1.1) > > https://bugassistant.libreoffice.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66420 > > I believe this should be a QUALITY rule. It is in the review queue for 4.1.0: htt

[Libreoffice-qa] URGENT Cherry pick regressions to next release

2013-07-07 Thread Pedro
Hi all I believe that if regressions in MAB are fixed then the patch MUST be included in the following release. Otherwise there is no point in having Release Candidates. Here is an example that will cause DATA LOSS for any user of 4.1.0 (it was cherry picked to 4.1.1) https://bugassistant.libreo