On 10/31/2011 10:19 AM, Petr Mladek wrote:
What is your opinion, please?
Hard to tell without trying it out, I'd say. Maybe pick some random
test now done via testtool and see if it can be ported to
subsequenttest's pure UNO approach and is better afterwards.
My feeling is that many
On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 20:39 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
Bernhard M. Wiedemann píše v St 19. 10. 2011 v 16:04 +0200:
during package install I got
/opt/lo-dev/program/unopkg.bin: error while loading shared libraries:
libpng12.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/18/2011 03:21 PM, Petr Mladek wrote:
Hi,
first, I am sorry with the late reply. I have attended the LO
conference last week...
Bernhard M. Wiedemann píše v St 12. 10. 2011 v 17:57 +0200:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On 10/10/2011
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/10/2011 02:53 PM, Petr Mladek wrote:
Michael Meeks píše v Po 10. 10. 2011 v 12:44 +0100:
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 12:36 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
One possibility would be to use night builds from the plain
build.
Yep; I guess we could prolly
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 12:36 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
Is is supposed for testing of the openSUSE LO packages or
the plain LO build?
The plain build I suggest.
Is the testing automatic or manual?
Automatic via openQA (which is awesome but well hidden ;-)
Also I wonder where
