On 16.4.2016 12:20, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
@QA team: Does this sound like something that would make it easier for
you to add tests for spreadsheet functions?
Hi Markus,
both variants are similarly arduous, so it's developer decision. If
these new test will lead to easier incorporating of
mpiler and formula interpreter tests can only be used in the
automated testing. One advantage of the new approach would be that it makes
it easier for non-developers to write such test documents and make
therefore sure that all functions are properly tested.
>
> Regards,
> Pedro
>
>
&g
, if manual testing your files leads to greater compatibility you can
count me in.
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-writing-unit-test-for-calc-functions-tp4181287p4181297.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Hey guys,
so once again I was bit by our missing systematic unit tests for all the
formula functions. I'm wondering what we can do to make external people
interested in adding tests for all functions. Right now I think that my csv
based approach is too complicated (how to handle precision issues,
