Michael Meeks wrote:
> + online (Michael)
> + online branch maintenance (Thorsten)
> + wondering for 5.3 – what’s the policy ?
> + not using gerrit much.
> + customer wants to do stabilization & bug-fixing
> - plan for one review in gerrit (Thorsten
Michael Meeks wrote:
> $ cd online
> $ git log libreoffice-5-3-branch-point..origin/libreoffice-5-3 --oneline
> | nl -> 43
>
Does not seem to match reality:
$ git merge-base origin/master origin/libreoffice-5-3
0f2e5ef3fe8d52a2f58afc6d8ac19046df155202
$ git log 0f2e5ef3fe8d52a2f58afc6d8ac19046d
Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> * Jean-Sebastien:
> + Linagora branch for French ministry (mimo branch)
> + Tell us name of desired branch, will be added (Thorsten)
> + Sub-branches even? Probably not needed
>
Done - also added Jean-Sebastien as committer, otherwise the whole
branch exercise
* Present:
+ Thorsten, Miklos, Heiko, Michael W, Sophie, Cloph, Xisco, Stephan,
Eike, Olivier
* Completed Action Items:
+ enable new help for tinderboxes (Christian) → in distro-config
+ disable HSQLDB auto-migration for now except for experimental (Tamas B)
+ provide distro name
Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> > + setup new CentOS7 baseline VM (Cloph)
> > [ done for the 64bit builds, for 32bit we stick to the CentOS6 ]
>
Perhaps then time to start pondering deprecation of the Linux x86
platform?
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_
Michael Meeks wrote:
> * Hackfests & Events (Thorsten)
>+ next year hackfests coming up:
>+ FOSDEM in February - 2 days before the conference expected.
>
Apologies, there's an off-by-one error:
tentative FOSDEM schedule is as follows:
Wednesday, January 30
* Hackfest at betacowork
T
Hi Xisco,
Xisco Fauli wrote:
> Generated on 2018-12-11 based on stats from 2018-12-09. Note: Metabugs
> are ignored.
>
Thx a bunch for the weekly stats, and the extra data on the blog
(https://qa.blog.documentfoundation.org/2018/12/04/qa-report-november-2018/).
As that question was asked from a
* Present:
+ Sophie, Olivier, Michael W, Michael M, Miklos, Kendy, Stephan
Michael S, Caolan, Thorsten, Christian, Heiko, Justin, Eike
* Completed Action Items:
* Pending Action Items:
+ send code pointers to Olivier on UNO commands ↔ UI XML mapping (Kendy)
+ work with Mert to b
Michael Meeks wrote:
> * GSOC 2019 (Xisco)
> AI: Submit proposal (Thorsten/Heiko/Xisco)
>
Done.
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
* Present:
+ Caolán, Eike, Kendy, Miklos, Cloph, Xisco, Sberg, Olivier,
Michael W, Heiko, Thorsten, Michael S
* Completed Action Items:
+ mail BoD wrt. MS store update (Cloph) → now with the board
* Pending Action Items:
+ disable popups for release-build only in 6.2/.3 (Justin
Miklos Vajna wrote:
> + mentors are needed … 2 weeks from now
> + volunteers to mentor using jitsi / IRC can help too (Christian)
> + in theory had hackfest-ng but short notice (Thorsten)
> + was too late :(
> + https://wiki.documentfoundation.org
Hi,
Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> * Hackfests & Events (Sophie)
> + Dresden Hackfest (Thorsten)
> + most probably won’t happen, haven’t heard from the guys (Thorsten)
> + tentatively end of October, talking to FSFE people there
>+ not confirmed, working on that
>
Clarification (didn't
Hi *,
to bump the topic - looks like a (slight) preference for the dates
17th/18th of October is emerging. If people are interested (no
commitment, just flagging interest - helps us finalizing the date!):
please add your name to the wiki:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Hackfest/Muenchen2019#
Hi Christoph,
Christoph Schäfer wrote:
> [LibreOffice auto-updated from 6.3 to 6.4 on Windows 10]
>
> I originally installed LO via the MSI installers from the TDF site,
> and I have no other "helpful software" regarding updates on my
> computers.
>
Then it's not possible the source of the problem
Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> + build an ODF filter commit list + names, who need to file
> their extensions in the wiki (Thorsten)
>
This is done - wiki and /bin/check-implementer-notes.py have
been updated, such that currently the list of missing notes is empty.
So - for virtually all of you
Hi *,
Miklos Vajna wrote:
> * FOSDEM 2021 (Italo)
> + next deadline: 2021-01-15
> + need to pre-record the videos by then!
> + have a lightning talks slot (Thorsten)
> + still has to be pre-recorded + attend at the end to answer questions
> + expected time is 1h
> + will decide
Hi,
Miklos Vajna wrote:
> * FOSDEM 2021 (Italo)
> + next deadline: 2021-01-24
> + need to create slides + pre-record the videos by then!
>
Additionally, we have a lightning talk slot for our dev room, which
you can fill with last-minute submissions about the cool stuff you're
hacking on.
I
Miklos Vajna wrote:
> + next deadline: lightning talks: 5 mins → till Sat (30th)
> + send the link of video+slides to Thorsten
>
I'll need your video ASAP, plus your login name on penta.fosdem.org
(so we can add you ask speakers in the system).
Looking fwd to exciting talks! :)
Cheers,
--
Dante Doménech wrote:
> What are those talks about?
>
Anything you'd like to talk about - should have a libreoffice code
underlying subject of course. ;)
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa maili
Kaganski, Mike made 50 review comments in 1 month, and 232 in 1 year
McNamara, Caolán made 42 review comments in 1 month, and 174 in 1 year
Thorsten Behrens made 38 review comments in 1 month, and 152 in 1 year
+ big CONGRATULATIONS to contributors who have at least 1 mer
Hi *,
Miklos Vajna wrote:
> * Budget 2022 (Xisco)
> + https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Budget2022
> + ideas are welcome till the end of the year
> + earlier deadline? (Thorsten)
> + take list if ideas with estimates by end Nov?
> AI: give a heads-up on the dev list
Reminder - deadline for getting proposals ready is **this Sunday** !
I wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> Miklos Vajna wrote:
> > * Budget 2022 (Xisco)
> > + https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Budget2022
> > + ideas are welcome till the end of the year
> > + earlier deadline? (Thorsten)
Hi *,
Miklos Vajna wrote:
> * ucb: webdav-curl: put user name from config into LOCK request (Michael S)
> + https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/133143
> + benefit: if some other user edits a file on a webdav share, then publish
> the name of the editing user
> + but this sends user data
es in 1 year
Nazanin Yadi made 1 patches in 1 month, and 2 patches in 1 year
+ top 10 reviewers:
Vajngerl, Tomaž made 146 review comments in 1 month, and 416 in 1 year
Thorsten Behrens made 104 review comments in 1 month, and 856 in 1
year
Adolfo Jayme Barrientos ma
ž made 146 review comments in 1 month, and 416 in 1 year
Thorsten Behrens made 104 review comments in 1 month, and 856 in 1
year
Adolfo Jayme Barrientos made 92 review comments in 1 month, and 1076
in 1 year
Michael Stahl made 86 review comments in 1 month, and 1212 in
Mike Kaganski wrote:
> I read them, and I am not subscribed to the design list.
>
Same here. Worth keeping, IMO.
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
and 1044 in 1 year
Kłos, Szymon made 72 review comments in 1 month, and 186 in 1 year
Vajna, Miklos made 72 review comments in 1 month, and 702 in 1 year
Grandin, Noel made 52 review comments in 1 month, and 480 in 1 year
Christian Lohmaier made 52 review
mari Lauhakangas, Xisco Faulí, Heiko
> > Tietze, Florian Effenberger, Italo Vignoli, Khaled Hosny, Sophie
> > Gautier, Olivier Hallot, Christian Lohmaier, Stéphane Guillou, Hossein
> > Nourikhah
> > + Affiliated with Collabora: Tomaž Vajngerl, Justin Luth
>
Hi y'all,
Ilmari Lauhakangas wrote:
> some tweaks were still needed to the ranking, apologies for the hassle.
> Let's decide on the final ranking in the ESC meeting tomorrow:
>
> https://pad.documentfoundation.org/p/esc
>
Quick heads-up: I've added a link to the latest draft of the ESC
tendering
review comments in 1 month, and 784 in 1 year
Christian Lohmaier made 52 review comments in 1 month, and 396 in 1
year
Thorsten Behrens made 50 review comments in 1 month, and 454 in 1 year
Weghorn, Michael made 46 review comments in 1 month, and 182 in 1 year
Hi Patrick,
Patrick Luby wrote:
> Not sure if the "1 review on libreoffice-7-6 is needed" is mine or not. But
> if not, can you include the following Gerrit change in that agenda item?:
>
> https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/154701
>
That's already merged? - the agenda line item was suppose
in 1 year
Kaganski, Mike made 78 review comments in 1 month, and 366 in 1 year
Xisco Fauli made 56 review comments in 1 month, and 784 in 1 year
Christian Lohmaier made 52 review comments in 1 month, and 396 in 1
year
Thorsten Behrens made 50 review
Hi,
as discussed last week, we've found a slot for an in-person ESC
meeting, here in Bucharest.
You can find the pretalx link here:
https://events.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice-conference-2023/talk/8DL7YN/
We'll not run the regular agenda, but leave space for more general,
and/or long-te
Dear y'all,
if you are a TDF trustee, and haven't voted yet - please do consider
doing so by tomorrow midnight (CET timezone)!
This time around, I'm glad to report that there's a lot of choice for
electing board members - so do make your voice heard, and head over to
the election interface here:
Hi y'all,
Miklos Vajna wrote:
> + MAR update
> + enabled now for 24.0.0 -> 24.1.1, seems to work
>
Nice, thanks indeed Cloph! :)
> + on master, no longer experimental, but still need to opt in
> (Stephan)
> + for now, hardcoded to check once a week
>
With the feature
Dear Community,
The Document Foundation is pleased to announce the third release
candidate of our upcoming LibreOffice 4.0.3. This will be the third in
a series of frequent updates to our feature-packed 4.0 branch. Please
be aware that LibreOffice 4.0.3 RC3 is not ready for production use,
you sho
Florian Effenberger wrote:
> IMHO, the LibreOffice lists at FreeDesktop are configured in a wrong
> way, because they allow everyone to post. I'd never ever do so on
> the TDF infrastructure, it's against any good mail practice I know
> of, but the feedback I got when noting that was that "develope
Florian Effenberger wrote:
> sorry if I sounded overly harsh - I was looking at it from a
> postmaster's perspective, where I still think this setup is just
> pure horror.
>
That's why we run it on fdo - such that you don't have to worry. ;)
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
signature.asc
Description: Digit
Robinson Tryon wrote:
> My general thought on lists that get spam and/or have a constant of
> new users using the list improperly is that you set everyone's
> moderation bit to be ON initially.
>
Cloned the dev list's setup for the QA list, that should help quite a
lot. Also added Florian Reisinger
Dear Community,
The Document Foundation is pleased to announce the first Beta release
of our new LibreOffice 4.1. The upcoming 4.1 will be our sixth major
release in two and a half years, and comes with a nice set of new
features. Please be aware that LibreOffice 4.1 Beta1 is not ready yet
for pro
Dear Community,
The Document Foundation is pleased to announce the first release
candidate of our upcoming LibreOffice 4.0.4. This will be the fourth
in a series of frequent updates to our feature-packed 4.0
branch. Please be aware that LibreOffice 4.0.4 RC1 is not ready for
production use, you sh
Hi there,
Cedric rocks & created a SUSE studio appliance (ready-to-run Linux
install) with Alfresco pre-configured.
You can find it here, including details on how to run/access it:
http://susestudio.com/a/ZAkznE/alfresco
That hopefully makes testing this fairly new and important area much
easi
Dear Community,
The Document Foundation is pleased to announce the second Beta release
of our new LibreOffice 4.1. The upcoming 4.1 will be our sixth major
release in two and a half years, and comes with a nice set of new
features. Please be aware that LibreOffice 4.1 Beta2 is not ready yet
for pr
Dear Community,
The Document Foundation is pleased to announce the second release
candidate of our upcoming LibreOffice 4.0.4. This will be the fourth
in a series of frequent updates to our feature-packed 4.0
branch. Please be aware that LibreOffice 4.0.4 RC2 is not ready for
production use, you s
Dear Community,
The Document Foundation is pleased to announce the first release
candidate of our new LibreOffice 4.1. The upcoming 4.1 will be our
sixth major release in two and a half years, and comes with a nice set
of new features. Please be aware that LibreOffice 4.1 RC1 is not ready
yet for
Dear Community,
The Document Foundation is happy to announce the first release
candidate of LibreOffice 3.6.7. The upcoming 3.6.7 will be the seventh
in a series of frequent bugfix releases for our stable 3.6
branch. Please be aware that LibreOffice 3.6.7 RC1 is not ready for
production use, you s
* Attending:
Ahmad, Lionel, Eike, Petr, Caolan, Cloph, Andras, Astron,
Thorsten, Michael S.
* New Action items:
+ further improve date API for RC3 (Eike/Michael S.)
* Pending Action items:
+ get remaining GOSC guys introduced on the QA list (Cedric)
+ update visible bu
Dear Community,
The Document Foundation is pleased to announce the second release
candidate of our new LibreOffice 4.1. The upcoming 4.1 will be our
sixth major release in two and a half years, and comes with a nice set
of new features. Please be aware that LibreOffice 4.1 RC2 is not ready
yet for
Dear Community,
The Document Foundation is pleased to announce the third release
candidate of our new LibreOffice 4.1. The upcoming 4.1 will be our
sixth major release in two and a half years, and comes with a nice set
of new features. Please be aware that LibreOffice 4.1 RC3 is not ready
yet for
Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
> Possible blocker (data loss) :
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67093
>
Hi Jean-Baptiste,
hmm - so that bug is specific to the French localization?
> Sincerely, I think that fdo#67093 + fdo#67031 + fdo#67041 will make
> LO 4.1.0.3 very difficult to defe
I wrote:
> fdo#67031 + fdo#67041 are being hotfixed as we speak. :)
>
New debs available here:
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/deb/
, if someone could confirm the above two bugs are fixed there, I'll
replace the packages on the mirrors.
Thanks a lot,
-- Thorsten
signature.asc
Hi *,
QA found a number of problems that were initially addressed via a
hotfix for the Linux packages, but then resulted in a fully new build
today - we're now uploading builds of LibreOffice 4.1.0 RC4 to a
public (but non-mirrored - so don't spread news too widely!) place, as
soon as they're avai
Dear Community,
The Document Foundation is pleased to announce the fourth release
candidate of our new LibreOffice 4.1. The upcoming 4.1 will be our
sixth major release in two and a half years, and comes with a nice set
of new features. Please be aware that LibreOffice 4.1 RC4 is not ready
yet for
Attending: Sophie, Tibby, Kohei, Astron, Norbert, Lionel, Bjoern,
Joel, Cloph, Petr, Thorsten
* Completed Action Items:
+ fdo#60858 needs input (Astron)
+ file svg / help->about issue in master as 4.2 MAB (Astron)
* Pending Action Items:
+ improve configure to avoid version
Tommy wrote:
> >+ Closing 3.6 MABs
> > * Tommy did that, thanks a lot!
>
> not yet finished, it will take more weeks to complete...
> when I started the review 62 MABs were present, actually the count
> is at 49.
>
Thank you still! :)
> >+ MAB handling:
> > * by next major rele
Dear Community,
The Document Foundation is pleased to announce the first release
candidate of our upcoming LibreOffice 4.0.5. This will be the fifth in
a series of frequent updates to our feature-packed 4.0 branch. Please
be aware that LibreOffice 4.0.5 RC1 is not ready for production use,
you sho
Dear Community,
The Document Foundation is pleased to announce the first release
candidate of LibreOffice 4.1.1. The upcoming 4.1.1 will be the first
in a sequence of frequent bugfix release for our feature-packed 4.1
line. Please be aware that LibreOffice 4.1.1 RC1 is not ready yet for
production
Attending: Caolan, Christian, David, Eike, Kendy, Kohei, Lionel,
Michael S., Norbert, Petr, Robinson, Stephan, Thorsten,
Tim, Tsahi
* Completed Action Items:
+ add 'download updates from inside LibO' to GSoC wiki page (Astron)
+ come up with proposal for what to do ab
Dear Community,
The Document Foundation is pleased to announce the second release
candidate of our upcoming LibreOffice 4.0.5. This will be the fifth in
a series of frequent updates to our feature-packed 4.0 branch. Please
be aware that LibreOffice 4.0.5 RC2 is not ready for production use,
you sh
Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> > I can also confirm that the build
> > libo-master~2013-08-17_22.48.29_LibreOfficeDev_4.2.0.0.alpha0_Win_x86 from
> > Tinderbox 42 crashes on start.
>
> No idea - Thorsten?
>
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/Win-X86@42/2013-08-19_23.11.46/
e.g. works just fi
Pedro wrote:
> None of the builds from tinderbox 39 and 42 works under Windows XP.
>
Sure sure, that is I suppose a general fix. Was just trying to make
sure my box is not utterly broken by always doling out crashing
builds. ;)
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_
Pedro wrote:
> Thorsten Behrens wrote
> > * Pending Action Items:
> > + upgrade 3.6 users to 4.0.5 once that is out (Thorsten/Kendy)
>
> Please make sure that you check OS version first.
>
Hi Pedro,
I don't think that is possible - 3.6.x versions are alr
Florian Reisinger wrote:
> Don't we send the OS to the server?
>
Yes. But the OS in this case is just 'Windows'. ;)
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-q
Pedro wrote:
> Regarding your question, I made a similar request over a month ago but
> nobody bothered to answer... I hope someone answers to you...
>
Noticing now, cleaned up there.
Best course of action in the future - poke one of the tinderbox admins
(visible from the log / detailed tb info p
Pedro wrote:
> Regarding poking: I tried that in the past... I was either ignored
> or told I was disrespectful.
>
Heh. So feel free to poke me (one of the tinderbox admins) in the
future. Apologies if I should have ignored you in the past. ;)
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
signature.asc
Description: Digi
Pedro wrote:
> Could you please rename the binaries in the Master branch so that
> they are named
> master~2013-10-27_23.53.26_LibreOfficeDev_4.2.0.0.alpha0_Win_x86.msi
> like the other tinderboxes? (i.e. remove the libo- prefix which is
> redundant?)
>
Can look into that - out of curiosity, why d
Robinson Tryon wrote:
> Indeed -- it looks like something happened on the 7th such that builds
> were no longer produced (or no longer uploaded).
>
Let me check.
-- Thorsten
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa ma
Robinson Tryon wrote:
> > Other boxes don't seem to have resolved. There is no latest build in tb-42
> > or tb-39.
>
> Confirmed. CC'ing kendy (owner: tb-39) and thorsten (owner: tb-42).
>
Yup. Some residual sillyness in the fallback code for older source
versions. On it, test build is running.
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> So my guess it is the extension integration, the bundling of the
> dictionaries, the enabling of the mozab connector (that then also
> bundles additional microsoft-runtimes)
>
> @thorsten - bug in the tinderbox scripts?
>
If anything, then the setup. Someone throw me o
I wrote:
> Robinson Tryon wrote:
> > > Other boxes don't seem to have resolved. There is no latest build in tb-42
> > > or tb-39.
> >
> > Confirmed. CC'ing kendy (owner: tb-39) and thorsten (owner: tb-42).
> >
> Yup. Some residual sillyness in the fallback code for older source
> versions. On it,
Pedro wrote:
> State of daily Master builds (for Windows) on the 22nd of November 2013:
>
Thx for the overview!
> Comments:
>
> 1) Tinderbox (alias TB) #39 and #42 don't provide the needed txt
> file
>
Seems to be related to the different tinderbox scripts (both use
buildbot/tb/tb). Currently la
V Stuart Foote wrote:
> But would you also be able to tweak the build to include the "--enable-ia2"
> configuration so we'll be able to work on the experimental IAccessible2
> support for Assistive Technology tools?
>
Hah, good point - thx, enabled for the next upload.
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
sign
Pedro wrote:
> On a separate note: TB#42 is creating folders for the 4.1 branch but no
> files are being uploaded.
>
Yup, that came up separately - seems the script got broken after the
changes to instdir in master.
> Thorsten Behrens wrote
> >> 3) Build names for the TB
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> IMHO, the best solution we could hope for is something helping us like this
> - to let the enduser upload the file in question to the
> Dropbox-equivalent of his choice
> - then have a TDF service where our QA guys can throw an URL at (via
> email, webinterface, ssh l
V Stuart Foote wrote:
> But with TB-42 hung, can't tell at the moment.
>
Box rebooted w/o apparent reason. Heh, Windows. ;)
Builds again now.
-- Thorsten
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail addr
Robinson Tryon wrote:
> > 3) Consistent filenames across TB (hint to Thorsten ;) ) Not needed if one
> > build per OS is enough (see point 1)
> >
>
> Given that we have a community of tinderboxes, I don't see a reason
> against standardized names. If someone doesn't want to follow the
> particular
Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> 2) manifest:manifest without version attribute: I have no clue what
>version I should put there. Any hint?
>
manifest:version="1.2"
> 3) ODF mimetype 'application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.base' is invalid
>
That's rather something I'd fix in the validator. In genera
Michael Meeks wrote:
> + apparently a fiction that as of today there is idle TDF owned hardware.
>
No idea why this is relevant here, but for the record: there is a
number of donated / sponsored boxes with TDF, that for various
hysterical reasons are not under infra control. 3-4 of them are mos
Michael Meeks wrote:
> * Hackfests (Bjoern)
> + initial scheduling for 2015:
> + Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
> + happy to have us back
> + suggested March 19th, 20th: Thur / Fri.
> + happens during GSOC application phase.
>
That date just got co
Michael Meeks wrote:
> AI: + kind offer to setup an MSVC2015 tinderbox vs. master (Thorsten)
> + community edition ? (Jmux)
> + is that also 2015 ?
> + also available (Cloph)
>
VS2015 Community Edition now building on tb@42, nightlies here:
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.or
Hi guys,
below a list of question / issues with the ODF support - any
volunteers to convert those not being obvious test or ODF standard bugs
into bugzilla reports?
Thanks a lot, Thorsten
- Forwarded message from Jos van den Oever
-
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 08:39:17 +
From: Jos van
Katarína Behrens wrote:
> I'm slightly reluctant to make this 5.3 late feature, not because of
> the impact on translations (which I clarified in another e-mail to
> Cloph & Olivier) but because of the impact on how help is packaged
> on all 3 platforms for TDF builds and Linux distributions.
>
Ri
Michael Meeks wrote:
> * TDF / Budgeting / Brainstorming (Thorsten)
> + Idea generation:
> + Community Building feature / fix / tooling
> + Quality improvement tooling
> + Hard / dull but necessary stuff not getting done
> + Large missing features / function
> +
Loic Dachary wrote:
> As announced earlier this week
> https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/bug/ is now visible to the
> public.
>
Loic - just have to say, the result is *awesome*.
Thanks so much, to you & all the others involved!
Incidentally, would be interested if there's anything you'd like t
Hi there,
currently uploading a Mac testbuild of the feature/gtk3 branch to
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/Mac_OSX_10.6.0_gcc-4.0.1_x86/feature_gtk3_LibO-Dev_OOO350m1_MacOS_x86_install_en-US.dmg
I checked that it starts & basic functionality works, but would be
cool if people with some s
Terrence Enger wrote:
> Hmm. Is my question really of no interest? Or did I just time it
> badly with respect to the big conference?
>
Hi Terry,
I guess you'll get better answers on the dev list -
> On Fri, 2011-10-14 at 09:50 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
> > I notice that at least some calls
Stefan Weigel wrote:
> we do have a page for developers
> (http://www.libreoffice.org/get-involved/developers/) and another
> page for QA people
> (http://www.libreoffice.org/get-involved/qa-testers/).
>
> On both the reader is invited to join the developers mailing list
> (http://lists.freedeskto
Hi *,
for 3.4.4 rc2, we're now uploading builds to a public (but
non-mirrored - so don't spread news too widely!) place, as soon as
they're available. Grab them here:
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/
If you've a bit of time, please give them a try & report *critical*
bugs not yet
Dear Community,
The Document Foundation is happy to announce the second release
candidate of LibreOffice 3.4.4. The upcoming 3.4.4 will be the fourth
in a series of frequent bugfix releases for our 3.4 code line. Please
be aware that LibreOffice 3.4.4 RC2 is not yet ready for production
use, you s
Hi *,
for the upcoming new version 3.5.0, we start with a beta0 build that
likely will have a few rough edges, and is not yet feature-complete.
We will feature-freeze next Monday, and then branch off the code -
release plan timings are here:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan#3.5_re
Hi *,
with some delay, version is now on the mirrors, and reasonably
release-noted here:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/3.5.0/Beta0
Please amend with new findings.
Thanks a lot for your help,
-- Thorsten
pgpvDz6o4zHbr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Petr Mladek wrote:
> could you please do some testing with the last daily builds from the
> libreoffice-3-5 branch? See below where to get them.
>
> [snip]
>
> I suggest to use the last daily builds from the following tinderboxes:
>
For your convenience, I've copied the latest builds over to
h
klaus-jürgen weghorn ol wrote:
> after downloading Libo-dev-3.5.0beta1_install_multi.msi today in the
> evening I installed it in WIN7 64bit in parallel to 3.4.4. But
> looking in
> C:\Program Files (x86)\LOdev 3.5\program there were neither exes nor dlls.
> Even all other folders were empty. The o
Hi *,
for 3.5.0 beta1, we're now uploading preliminary builds to a public
(but non-mirrored - so don't spread news too widely!) place, as soon
as they're available. Grab them here:
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/
If you've a bit of time, please give them a try & report *critical*
Hi *,
for 3.4.5 RC1, we're now uploading builds to a public (but
non-mirrored - so don't spread news too widely!) place, as soon as
they're available. Grab them here:
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases-3-4/
If you've a bit of time, please give them a try & report *critical*
bugs not
Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
> @Thorsten: May be we should delete that from Pre-Release Webpage
> immediately.
>
Deleting it from the mirrors currently, beta1 should be up somewhen
tomorrow.
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
pgp1uhM47p7ad.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Dear Community,
The Document Foundation is happy to announce the first beta release of
LibreOffice 3.5.0. The upcoming 3.5 will be our third major release
line, packed with many exciting new features. Please be aware that
LibreOffice 3.5.0 Beta1 is not ready for production use, you should
continue
Dear Community,
The Document Foundation is happy to announce the first release
candidate of LibreOffice 3.4.5. The upcoming 3.4.5 will be the fifth
in a series of frequent bugfix releases for our 3.4 code line. Please
be aware that LibreOffice 3.4.5 RC1 is not yet ready for production
use, you sho
Hi *,
for the upcoming new version 3.5.0, we continue with a beta2 build
that is now feature-complete. For further milestones on the way
towards 3.5.0, please refer to our release plan timings here:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan#3.5_release
Builds are now being uploaded to a pu
Dear Community,
The Document Foundation is happy to announce the second beta release
of LibreOffice 3.5.0. The upcoming 3.5 will be our third major release
line, packed with many exciting new features. Please be aware that
LibreOffice 3.5.0 Beta2 is not ready for production use, you should
continu
1 - 100 of 194 matches
Mail list logo
