Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Starmath syntax hightlight

[Dante Doménech]

The actual TDF is 43089
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43089
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

[Libreoffice-qa] Starmath syntax hightlight

[Dante Doménech]

 The starmath syntax highlight first revision is now available here:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/109639/21

I write asking for a deep review since it's a patch that may change the
user experience.
I'd like the UX team to take a look and evaluate the code legibility.
Note that bright colors have been avoided.
Maybe some documentation should be added.
Get sure the preferences page keeps up to the accessibility and quality
standards.
Can get a stability test with some twisted starmath code I haven't thought
of.
I can't think of any automated test, but it may be possible.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Starmath syntax hightlight

[Heiko Tietze]

Respective ticket is https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138129

On 29.01.21 12:46, Dante Doménech wrote:

The starmath syntax highlight first revision is now available here:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/109639/21 



I write asking for a deep review since it's a patch that may change the user 
experience.

I'd like the UX team to take a look and evaluate the code legibility.
Note that bright colors have been avoided.
Maybe some documentation should be added.
Get sure the preferences page keeps up to the accessibility and quality 
standards.
Can get a stability test with some twisted starmath code I haven't thought of.
I can't think of any automated test, but it may be possible.

___
LibreOffice mailing list
libreoff...@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice



--
Dr. Heiko Tietze, UX-Designer and UX-Mentor
Tel: +49 30 5557992-63 | Mail: heiko.tie...@documentfoundation.org
The Document Foundation, Kurfürstendamm 188, 10707 Berlin, DE
Gemeinnützige rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts
Legal details: https://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint



OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/