https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115515
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115587
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval |
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115592
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115288
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116297
--- Comment #8 from cson...@halmai.hu ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #5)
> Wasn't easy for me to repro the tooltip; one has to place cursor and mouse
> pointer at the right positions (never run into the trouble with those
> too
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116297
--- Comment #7 from cson...@halmai.hu ---
Created attachment 140764
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=140764&action=edit
semi-transparent tooltip - GIMP
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116297
cson...@halmai.hu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cson...@halmai.hu
--- Comment
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114886
--- Comment #7 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Eric Bright from comment #5)
> A huge drawback of the current, messy hierarchical view is that since it is
> not usable as it is due to all styles being listed whether or not they are
> ap
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114886
Eric Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #140761|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114886
Eric Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #140761|Hierarchical tree branch|Applied Styles view in
desc
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114886
--- Comment #5 from Eric Bright ---
A huge drawback of the current, messy hierarchical view is that since it is not
usable as it is due to all styles being listed whether or not they are applied,
one cannot easily know which paragraph sty
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114886
--- Comment #4 from Eric Bright ---
Created attachment 140761
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=140761&action=edit
Hierarchical tree branch view in LibreOffice Writer version 6.0.2.1 on Windows
10 (as of 2018-03-
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37932
raal changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fabiru...@gmail.com
--- Comment #15 from r
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114886
--- Comment #3 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Eric Bright from comment #2)
> Hierarchical tree lines that connects the branches as they appear nested...
Doesn't the look and feel of trees depend on your system theme?
--
You are rec
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90194
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Make B̶r̶e̶e̶z̶e̶ Colibre |Make Colibre the new
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90194
--- Comment #23 from V Stuart Foote ---
Removing B̶r̶e̶e̶z̶e̶ from the title. Colibre has been designed to be Windows
theme friendly (bug 115867) and is a better solution for all supported Windows
builds than Breeze/Sifr as replacement for
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114886
--- Comment #2 from Eric Bright ---
Created attachment 140753
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=140753&action=edit
Hierarchical tree branch view in another word-processor
Hierarchical tree lines that connects th
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115611
--- Comment #7 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #6)
> I do not understand your question.
You started comment 4 with "Yes (there is a limitation)", and I wanted to make
sure that it's only the zero that can
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115611
--- Comment #6 from Regina Henschel ---
"positiveInteger" is defined at
https://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-2-20041028/#positiveInteger
I do not understand your question. Numbers are always characters in file text,
because file text
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115611
--- Comment #5 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #4)
But "any" number (unsigned short or char makes sense) greater than zero would
be compliant with the format, right?
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115898
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu
--- Comm
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115611
--- Comment #4 from Regina Henschel ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #3)
> @Regina: Any format restrictions?
Yes. You need the attribute style:first-page-number of the
page-layout-properties. Notice, that this is different fro
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116248
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115611
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115611
--- Comment #2 from Heiko Tietze ---
Created attachment 140746
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=140746&action=edit
PP2016 starting with slide #3
PP16 hides this option at the slide dimension dialog. Better we p
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115852
Regina Henschel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rb.hensc...@t-online.de
--- Co
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115553
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115805
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval |difficultyBeginner,
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115887
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115887
--- Comment #1 from Heiko Tietze ---
Created attachment 140744
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=140744&action=edit
Screenshot of the issue
To rephrase: The comment indicator is hardly recognizable for cells wit
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90194
--- Comment #22 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #18)
> (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #16)
> > Meanwhile should we seek ESC approval to add as late feature...
>
> (In reply to andreas_k from commen
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115898
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115852
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90194
--- Comment #21 from Tomaz Vajngerl ---
Switching the default is the easiest of all.
The icon theme is already in a good shape so what I wonder is if there is
someone that would be against making it the default and why? Also as we don't
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116497
Xisco Faulí changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiscofa...@libreoffice.org
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115852
--- Comment #10 from Telesto ---
Created attachment 140741
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=140741&action=edit
Screencast
Screencast for bug 115852 and bug 106009
Thinking about this again: The arrow isn't re
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116497
--- Comment #5 from Telesto ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #4)
Ah, OK. I get it now.. And yes, the description matches with the button
function this way.
However, I'm still convinced about the limitation/ (forced) workflow.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115852
--- Comment #9 from Heiko Tietze ---
Created attachment 140739
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=140739&action=edit
Screencast of the current situation
Don't get the problem. Click into a cell and move the curso
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90194
--- Comment #20 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to andreas_k from comment #19)
> When I get a go for it I'll submit a change. Now I finalize the icon theme.
Usually you commit to Gerrit and let others submit.
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45789
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |tietze.he...@gmail.com
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90194
--- Comment #19 from andreas_k ---
When I get a go for it I'll submit a change. Now I finalize the icon theme.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Li
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90194
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
--- Comment #18 from Heiko Tie
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98030
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval |
Status|NEW
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116497
--- Comment #4 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Telesto from comment #3)
> Not sure if I understand this correctly. The "New styles from selection"
> (and Fill Format mode) are both deactivated in general for:
> * Frame styles
> * List
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116497
--- Comment #3 from Telesto ---
Created attachment 140737
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=140737&action=edit
Screenshot
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #2)
> It's the Fill Format Mode which is disabled
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116297
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116497
--- Comment #2 from Heiko Tietze ---
It's the Fill Format Mode which is disabled all the time. The New menu
(hamburger depending on the icon set) becomes active when you are in a list.
The same happens for table styles except it also enab
47 matches
Mail list logo