https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155834
--- Comment #3 from QA Administrators ---
[Automated Action] NeedInfo-To-Unconfirmed
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155893
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vsfo...@libreoffice.org
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122970
--- Comment #20 from Commit Notification
---
Hossein committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/f9f7cfc080c3adb751ceca96be4ca5440de4a2b6
tdf#122970 Fix direct
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122970
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||target:24.2.0
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155893
--- Comment #17 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to خالد حسني from comment #15)
> I don’t really have anything more to added. This is a feature request since
> the current behavior is working as intended.
What about the question
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155893
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|1 |0
Status|NEEDINFO
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155893
خالد حسني changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|kha...@libreoffice.org |
--- Comment #15 from خالد حسني
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155893
--- Comment #14 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
Created attachment 188002
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=188002=edit
Screenshot of behavior in MS Word 16
The behavior in MS Word 16 is similar to our current
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155893
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #187979|Screenshot |Screenshot of attachment
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155893
--- Comment #13 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
Created attachment 188001
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=188001=edit
Screenshot of attachment 187999
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155893
--- Comment #12 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
Created attachment 187999
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=187999=edit
Baseline, meanline and v-alignment - with long and short ascenders
Khaled, please have a look at
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155893
--- Comment #11 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #10)
> Ah, but it is top-aligned! The mean-lines of the text on both cells are
> aligned, at their highest possible position.
I'll illustrate with a
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155893
--- Comment #10 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to خالد حسني from comment #9)
> In your first option the text is bottom aligned not top aligned.
Ah, but it is top-aligned! The mean-lines of the text on both cells are
aligned, at
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155893
--- Comment #9 from خالد حسني ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #8)
> -
> |l | |
> | abcd | abcd |
> -
>
> -
> |l | abcd |
> | abcd | |
> -
>
> I
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155893
--- Comment #8 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to خالد حسني from comment #7)
> It depends on what the expectation is. It seems the current behavior aligns
> the ascenders and descenders not the base lines.
I guessing you mean either
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146540
--- Comment #2 from Mike Kaganski ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 42428 ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131876
--- Comment #10 from Mike Kaganski ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 42428 ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155926
Telesto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needsUXEval
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82195
--- Comment #4 from Mike Kaganski ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 42428 ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155893
--- Comment #7 from خالد حسني ---
(In reply to Stéphane Guillou (stragu) from comment #5)
> Khaled, do you have an opinion on this?
It depends on what the expectation is. It seems the current behavior aligns the
ascenders and
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155893
--- Comment #6 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #4)
> Could you please share a screenshot of your expectation?
I can't quite do that; let me explain. I expect the baseline of the text in
both cells to be
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155834
--- Comment #2 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #1)
> At least according the styles inspector the "c" is still a list item, just
> without a list label string.
Indeed it is shown as part of list. But when
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155834
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155893
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155886
--- Comment #5 from ady ---
(In reply to Hossein from comment #4)
> If you reduce the
> size of the cell, it will reduce to 2 or even 1 hash marks
No, it is always 3 # marks (partially hidden in some cases, but they are there;
for
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130646
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125876
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval |difficultyMedium, easyHack,
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139933
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Blocks|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155671
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155299
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsDevAdvice, needsUXEval |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155886
--- Comment #4 from Hossein ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #2)
> Created attachment 187978 [details]
> Excel vs. LibreOffice
>
> I don't see the benefit. It rather clutters the UI.
To describe its benefit, I should elaborate
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155893
--- Comment #4 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #3)
> The baselines should be aligned even if I don't resize the row.
Could you please share a screenshot of your expectation?
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155893
--- Comment #3 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #1)
> I don't see an issue. Resize the row
The baselines should be aligned even if I don't resize the row. I'd say with
the default vertical alignment, but at
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153153
--- Comment #10 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #9)
The upgrade prompt already is conditional, and it is disabled in distro repos.
If not combined into the prompt, we could still reuse the same branding
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155886
--- Comment #3 from ady ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #2)
> It rather clutters the UI.
No, it does not. The current behavior (only and always 3 # marks) for
inexperienced users is frequently not clear enough, and even less
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153153
--- Comment #9 from Heiko Tietze ---
Showing an information like
Version 7.5.4.2...
You are on the latest version, find nightly builds here
(maybe pointing to developer versions is too much)
and
Version 7.4.3...
The latest public
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155670
--- Comment #6 from Heiko Tietze ---
Created attachment 187980
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=187980=edit
Comparison MSO vs. LO
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #5)
> Kind of duplicate for bug 143848.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155839
--- Comment #12 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #8)
> (1) (unrelated) somehow, this (and same link in EditModules) does not work
> for me in Version: 7.5.4.2
This should be fixed!
> (2) ...there are lots
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155893
--- Comment #2 from Heiko Tietze ---
Created attachment 187979
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=187979=edit
Screenshot
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155893
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155670
--- Comment #5 from Heiko Tietze ---
Kind of duplicate for bug 143848. I wonder how consistent such the selection
can be. Assuming B1:B2 and C1:C3 is mergeded vs. A1:A3, B2:B3 - what should
happen when you select A1 in these scenarios?
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155886
--- Comment #2 from Heiko Tietze ---
Created attachment 187978
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=187978=edit
Excel vs. LibreOffice
I don't see the benefit. It rather clutters the UI.
--
You are receiving this
42 matches
Mail list logo
