https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155745
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155757
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155740
--- Comment #12 from Mike Kaganski ---
Additional points to those who will have to consider this on the next UX call:
1. Master documents is an advanced feature, not *designed* as something to be
used without a bit of learning. A
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155740
--- Comment #11 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #9)
1. You are trying to over-regulate the procedure, without thinking why it is as
it is (and removing my resolution, when I would ask if it's up to you to
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155740
--- Comment #10 from David ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #7)
> They are discarded in the context of the larger document. And I explained
> and gave an example of when the user may want them kept rather than
> discarded.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155740
--- Comment #9 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #8)
> (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #7)
> Since we do open-source business my _opinion_ has as much value as anyone's
> else. In most cases I agree
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155740
--- Comment #8 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #7)
> It is impolite to mark an issue WONTFIX based on UX considerations when...
Since we do open-source business my _opinion_ has as much value as anyone's
