Hi
Le 18/09/2015 13:23, bugzilla-dae...@bugs.documentfoundation.org a écrit :
UX: what do you think?
Agreed. But, conversely, going back to the default default template
(hard-coded?) should be easy as well.
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
color paper) and
others from another one (my actual situation for the template stated
above). Well, anyway, the Paper tray option is already in the Page Style
dialog.
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffi
that at first. Does the drop
down (which is not displayed in the mockup) include all the current
Navigation toolbar buttons, ie: Reminders, Controls, etc?
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux
types of objects.
+1000!
BTW, note that currently, the naming constraints are not consistent
across objects: some accept spaces (eg: frame name) others won't (eg:
table name).
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing
.
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
. A professional writer or power user needs accessing the
Navigator and the Stylist all the time. Keeping the current shortcuts
(F5 and F11 resp.) is a requirement. BTW, having new ones for the other
Sidebar panes would ensure consistency.
Thanks,
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
Panes (and
remove them from the toolbar).
Dunno how restrictive is your wording Floating Panes, but it is
obvious to me that these panes *must* be able to be anchored.
Are you trying to mend something that's not broken?
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
that floating window since the navigator is in the
sidebar (see bug #73151).
Unless I missed the obvious, the sidebar doesn't allow to view the
Navigator *and* the Stylist both at once. In this case, I much prefer
the two individual panels, anchored one above the other (on the right ;)
--
Jean-Francois
-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
LibO to MSO. Please. LibO has to get its own
personality and be itself. Promoting styles, for instance :)
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http
Hi Mirek,
Le 14/11/2013 22:45, Mirek M. a écrit :
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Jean-Francois Nifenecker
jean-francois.nifenec...@laposte.net
mailto:jean-francois.nifenec...@laposte.net wrote:
Hi,
Le 14/11/2013 17:10, Mirek M. a écrit :
I would definitely vote
then shows a menu with all current
metadata variables, and a Add... entry for adding a new one).
My 2 euro-cents,
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http
,
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
) while and if things go
bad, you don't know how to set them back.
Having been in first level help desk for years, I can see how often
people are bitten by such automatisms (auto backup is an example).
Just my 2 cents ;)
and mine, as well :-)
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
, but they have to be told.
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
, local.
IOW, changing a style is worth the few extra clicks, if any and setting
direct formatting is actually requiring many more clicks (you forgot to
multiply the local formatting clicks by the number of local settings).
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
. AFAIK, the current hiding mechanism do support that well.
-- Table styles
A long-time missing feature
-- Simplify the list styles
(though I do like them)
and probably others...
All the best,
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise
that was required from the poor guy who made that... err... thing.
Worse, if possible: this %$§ is *still* in use although I trained these
people to use Draw :,(
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux
.
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
that most of my
colleagues wouldn't know either (fortunately we're using the Windows
version with the floppy icon ;-)
And it doesn't look like any nightstand I had.
Some kind of a cultural gap, maybe?
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux
answer here.
Or if devs can re-associate style to the text, then no need for
confirmation. But it should be much much more complicated !
Yep. This would be the best option and I agree it might be difficult to
implement.
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
for that matter.
My 2 euro-cents,
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
a whole word, but uncommon for a
whole word to be a subscript or a superscript.
Would this subscript/superscript behaviour be optional?
I've seen technical docs using superscript for whole words.
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux
.
We, as a free-software, have a responsibility: make the people
understand that, whatever tool they elect, they have to understand it
then to learn its use.
So I repeat my answer: the rulers must certainly *not* be hidden,
neither in Writer nor in Impress.
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker
on his document. But, of course, this operation should
be undoable (which it is not currently).
Thanks for your comments,
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http
is the actual font size.
And, disabling the aufit feature after having enabled it should give the
original font size back, of course.
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise
preview is cluttered. To me, it
is too much integrated with the modules. A modal window would less
disturb the user, making things clear about what is what (eg: the page
preview in Calc displays two zoom rulers... why so? Which is the right one?)
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
with the Format/Page dialog and that the page preview is quite
unpracticable to this regard.
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo
of a red caret seems very good to me if we go with
either of the above two ways (but a red block would be even more
descriptive methinks)
Dunno about the red thing wrt visually impaired people, but, at least,
having a block caret is a good idea.
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
the cell contents (ie, the data bar) and the cell
(possibly invisible) border, then the large layout is the best for me.
In this case, with the small version, the user is constrained to have
some spacing which he might not want. Thus the large layout fits more
needs/tastes.
--
Jean-Francois
such a big deal?
As for the users' confusion: yes, it might be. OTOH, I think it might
also help users understand a spreadsheet can hold more than one sheet.
As a result, I'd stay with the current 3 default sheets scheme.
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
it would be better to have
both presets' selection to behave consistently.
Thanks for your attention,
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org
, contrary to what you're thinking.
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
a simple way of changing
dimensions proportionaly. That checkbox state should be recorded.
This has annoyed me since the very beginning when I got to use OOo 1.1.
Would the change be a big deal?
Thanks for your attention,
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
(bold emphasis by default) instead of setting the bold
property to the underlying characters.
Side note: I feel a very important need for table styles in Writer.
--
Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice
Hello Michael and all,
wow! At least! Some *precise* and to the point answers! Thanks!
Le 18/02/2012 09:21, Michael Meeks a écrit :
On Sat, 2012-02-18 at 08:50 +0100, Jean-Francois Nifenecker wrote:
As I understand (correct me if necessary) this list goal -- which I find
excellent
to their users. (hence my visit here ;)
Now, back to the discussion :)
Le 18/02/2012 15:51, Michael Meeks a écrit :
On Sat, 2012-02-18 at 14:00 +0100, Jean-Francois Nifenecker wrote:
Ah! Ah! I'm starting to get the real thing which has nothing to see with
what I was presented at first: this list
38 matches
Mail list logo
