https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159748
Hubert Figuiere changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |h...@figuiere.net
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159748
Hubert Figuiere changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #12 from
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159845
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needsUXEval
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159562
Buovjaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Writer |UI
Summary|Image
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159573
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157207
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needsUXEval
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92406
--- Comment #24 from Heiko Tietze ---
Not really flexible implemented, for instance
SfxBoolItem InsertMode SID_ATTR_INSERT
sw/source/uibase/app/swmodule.cxx
sc/source/ui/app/scdll.cxx
...
SvxInsertStatusBarControl
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92406
--- Comment #23 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #22)
>
> 1. The status bar is a kind of toolbar, but a special special kind.
True, but TB in that it can only be toggled shown or hidden.
> 2. Some UNO
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92406
--- Comment #22 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #21)
Trying to embrace the simplicity and complexity at the same time... consider
the following set of potential state of affairs (which is obviously not the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131758
--- Comment #22 from Regina Henschel ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #21)
> What I can see in the current version (guess it hasnt changed), is a polygon
> and a filled polygon. For the latter you have to remove the filling to
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157064
--- Comment #12 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to Lucas from comment #11)
>
> This was one of the points of my proposal.
> A javaless/extensionless integration.
+1, but implemented with ability to consume and reformat to ODF using
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131758
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #21 from
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107181
Buovjaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WORKSFORME |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #21 from
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115515
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107181
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107181
--- Comment #20 from Heiko Tietze ---
Created attachment 192658
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=192658=edit
Page number dialog
Implemented for bug 86630, this should solve the issue.
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159543
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159738
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kain...@gmail.com
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159738
--- Comment #3 from Heiko Tietze ---
Created attachment 192654
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=192654=edit
Notebookbar
The command label (which is the menu entry) was changed in
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157064
--- Comment #11 from Lucas ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #10)
> If you need to explain it's not easy to understand :-)
Actually, the video is more about the programming. I programmed a mini
database/formatter and the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159738
BogdanB changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||buzea.bog...@libreoffice.or
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159748
--- Comment #11 from ady ---
@Timur,
We have different opinions. Please respect that, instead of tagging my
comments. I am confident that experience with spreadsheets tools is very
relevant here, and not all of us have the same
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159748
--- Comment #10 from ady ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #8)
> Static text to explain the UI/interaction is bad per se. We could just
> remove "Select 'Protect Sheet' from..." to make the tip compliant with all
> UI variants.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92406
--- Comment #21 from Heiko Tietze ---
Statusbar items are defined in xml files like
https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/sw/uiconfig/swriter/statusbar/statusbar.xml
and look like this
So we can reasonably tweak the alignment and
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92406
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||samuel.mehrbrodt@allotropia
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159073
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #8 from
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159470
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159717
--- Comment #13 from Heiko Tietze ---
Created attachment 192637
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=192637=edit
Save dialog
The expert option AllowOverrideLocking toggles whether you can open a file
anyway, does
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159717
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159748
Timur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159543
--- Comment #9 from Heiko Tietze ---
Essentially you expect the frame to behave like a scrolled window - if the
content exceeds the size a scrollbar appear. I disagree with this idea. While
shrinking the height you get feedback but it's
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159748
--- Comment #8 from Heiko Tietze ---
Static text to explain the UI/interaction is bad per se. We could just remove
"Select 'Protect Sheet' from..." to make the tip compliant with all UI
variants.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157064
--- Comment #10 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Lucas from comment #9)
> Of course: Debate is important to refine the ideas.
If you need to explain it's not easy to understand :-)
Seriously, every change is an improvement. But I
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157064
--- Comment #9 from Lucas ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #6)
> I read over the text and collect some idea. Please don't take any of these
> as a No, it's just what comes in mind while reading.
Of course: Debate is important
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159748
Timur changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159543
--- Comment #8 from Bob Harvey ---
(In reply to Bogaboga Man from comment #7)
> I see the issue. What needs to happen IMO, is to enable inserted object
> manipulation by default no matter what the user may have as LO settings for
> such
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159543
Buovjaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159737
--- Comment #9 from Rainer Bielefeld Retired
---
I did some tests and found the same behavior in the 2 other Spreadsheet
applications I tested:
a) SoftMaker PlanMaker
b) Cryptpad
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159737
Rainer Bielefeld Retired changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121958
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vsfo...@libreoffice.org
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159737
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159320
Gabor Kelemen (allotropia) changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121958
--- Comment #13 from Alex Thurgood ---
(In reply to Pedro from comment #12)
> Created attachment 179143 [details]
> Zotero addon in the menubar
>
> The addon neatly integrated into the menubar.
>
Out of interest, where is the data for
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157064
--- Comment #8 from Rafael Lima ---
Implementing a full CSL processor would be a gigantic undertaking. It would
also be hard to maintain over time.
As for open-source CSL processors, we have a few options:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157064
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121958
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157064
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needsUXEval
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159573
--- Comment #6 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to John Mills from comment #5)
> why don't we also give users some added info that LibreOffice uses
> extensions,
> provides alternative user interface options
This would be bug 137931,
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159573
--- Comment #5 from John Mills ---
If an carousel of images are shown after first start why don't we also give
users some added info that LibreOffice uses extensions, provides alternative
user interface options can save by default to
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159717
--- Comment #12 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #11)
> ideas: a) don't allow overwriting of files with different timestamp
Maybe. Keep the timestamp at the time of opening, and at least warn when saving
and
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159717
--- Comment #11 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #10)
> fixed in 2018
That's almost "always possible" ;-)
Back to the topic: What do you think about the two ideas: a) don't allow
overwriting of files with
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159717
--- Comment #10 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #8)
> Take a look at the attachments of bug 141026
Additionally, you seem to ignore my explicit words in comment 5, that on
Windows, it was different compared
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159717
--- Comment #9 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #8)
> Take a look at the attachments of bug 141026, it was always possible to open
> locked files.
Heh, it was tdf#108210 that I fixed in 2018 (in version
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159717
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158601
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159409
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval |difficultyMedium, easyHack,
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158653
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159156
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval |
Summary|Enhancement
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159724
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval |
Severity|normal
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159724
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|UI: No special character|The "No Character Style"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159156
--- Comment #17 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to khindall from comment #16)
> If you're going to do it at all, shouldn't it be put on a different
> keystroke and be the same for all modules?
Actually the 100% zoom could be assigned
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159156
--- Comment #16 from khind...@thirteens.net ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #15)
> +0 is not available in Writer --the default Writer assignment for
> 'Body Text' Paragraph style is OOo legacy as Jean-Frances notes.
>
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159409
--- Comment #8 from V Stuart Foote ---
Not an issue in Windows builds with WDM os/DE.
Without excessive font scaling, the Properties dialog fits without issue
additional fields and action buttons are visible in the ~637px dialog.
But a
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159156
--- Comment #15 from V Stuart Foote ---
We already provide the 100 (.uno:Zoom100Percent) UNO for keyboard and
menu/contextmenu customization.
+0 is not available in Writer --the default Writer assignment for 'Body
Text' Paragraph style
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159711
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159320
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159320
Gabor Kelemen (allotropia) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|1 |0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159711
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rayk...@gmail.com,
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159708
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159708
--- Comment #1 from breadsath...@gmail.com ---
UX Team -- please take a look at this enhancement. Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159708
breadsath...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159711
--- Comment #1 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
Created attachment 192548
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=192548=edit
Minimum-width styles sidebar for comparison
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159711
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needsUXEval
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159652
László Németh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158174
--- Comment #8 from László Németh ---
@Heiko: thanks for your question!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158174
--- Comment #7 from László Németh ---
@João: thanks for your bug report! It's worth to check the apostrophes in
books. For example, see the book cover of The accidental apostrophe (and the
apostrophes inside in the book):
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158174
László Németh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113388
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141776
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141776
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #42 from V
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141776
--- Comment #41 from ska...@yahoo.co.uk ---
(In reply to Buovjaga from comment #40)
> (In reply to skagon from comment #38)
> > • Mozilla Thunderbird : this is a case on its own. Practically ALL of the
> > keys are there as shortcuts and
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141776
--- Comment #40 from Buovjaga ---
(In reply to skagon from comment #38)
> • Mozilla Thunderbird : this is a case on its own. Practically ALL of the
> keys are there as shortcuts and nobody gets confused when writing an e-mail.
> Would
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141776
--- Comment #39 from ska...@yahoo.co.uk ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #37)
> (In reply to skagon from comment #36)
> >
> > What I had requested in comment 6 is that the original functionality is
> > restored. Original
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141776
--- Comment #38 from ska...@yahoo.co.uk ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #32)
> (In reply to skagon from comment #29)
> > Every piece of software works like that.
>
> It is very sad, that incorrect generalization is used to
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141776
--- Comment #37 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to skagon from comment #36)
>
> What I had requested in comment 6 is that the original functionality is
> restored. Original functionality is that accelerators work WITHOUT pressing
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141776
Wally changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|bwwald...@gmail.com |
See
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141776
--- Comment #36 from ska...@yahoo.co.uk ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #34)
> Actually seems behavior of the SC, with fix for bug 54169 in place for a
> 24.8 release, now does exactly what OP in comment 6 had requested. And
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141776
--- Comment #35 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #34)
> Actually seems behavior of the SC, with fix for bug 54169 in place for a
> 24.8 release, now does exactly what OP in comment 6 had requested.
Indeed;
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141776
--- Comment #34 from V Stuart Foote ---
Actually seems behavior of the SC, with fix for bug 54169 in place for a 24.8
release, now does exactly what OP in comment 6 had requested. And this issue is
resolved WFM
At 24.8 there are no SC
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141776
--- Comment #33 from ska...@yahoo.co.uk ---
>
> It is very sad, that incorrect generalization is used to defend one's point
> of view, attempting to trick people in believing that this is common
> software behavior (using examples from a
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141776
--- Comment #32 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to skagon from comment #29)
> Every piece of software works like that.
It is very sad, that incorrect generalization is used to defend one's point of
view, attempting to trick people in
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141776
--- Comment #31 from ska...@yahoo.co.uk ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #30)
> (In reply to skagon from comment #29)
>
> This argument does not mean that there should be inconsistency inside the
> same program. LibreOffice is
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141776
--- Comment #30 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to skagon from comment #29)
This argument does not mean that there should be inconsistency inside the same
program. LibreOffice is a *document* software, and one of its main focus points
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141776
--- Comment #29 from ska...@yahoo.co.uk ---
> To repeat myself: whether accelerators are shown or not, I am challenging
> the argument that one can expect simple keystrokes to start a function.
I will challenge the argument that simple
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113388
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133836
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133836
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||target:24.8.0
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133836
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141776
--- Comment #28 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to skagon from comment #27)
> Please check attachment #2 I just posted. This is what I see every time I
> close a document.
I fixed bug 54169 only yesterday. It will be available in a
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141776
--- Comment #27 from ska...@yahoo.co.uk ---
> To repeat myself: whether accelerators are shown or not, I am challenging
> the argument that one can expect simple keystrokes to start a function. Fact
> is that we have the focus on the
901 - 1000 of 40841 matches
Mail list logo