https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161411
--- Comment #7 from Tuomas Hietala ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #5)
> If we end up in a verbose label, I suggest to keep a short label and have
> the explanatory text in a tooltip.
>
> ("aka" might become a migraine for l10
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161411
--- Comment #6 from Tuomas Hietala ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #4)
> Unlike the Unicode 'Basic Latin' block, referring to ASCII is a problem as
> non-standard Extended-ASCII and localized 8-bit character mappings remain
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161441
--- Comment #15 from Telesto ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #14)
> (In reply to Telesto from comment #0)
> > UI: Hard to tell which side of a shape being used for as reference for
> > rotation
>
> Are you sure that is exac
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161502
--- Comment #4 from Commit Notification
---
Bayram Çiçek committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/9bbb02bcd7cf26b3e69e12481ffd041019d76082
tdf#161502: change Struc
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161502
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||target:25.2.0
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161515
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161441
--- Comment #14 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Telesto from comment #0)
> UI: Hard to tell which side of a shape being used for as reference for
> rotation
Are you sure that is exactly the problem? See below
> This rather common
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161502
--- Comment #3 from Bayram Çiçek ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #2)
> Was thinking about a shorter label like "Content" or to just remove the
> label (only reason for the label is a11y).
Thank for the suggestion. I changed th
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161502
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||heiko.tietze@documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161252
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda |
|tion.org/show
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157064
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda |
|tion.org/show
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157064
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||testing1237...@yahoo.com
--- Comm
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161252
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCO
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161441
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needsUXEval
CC|he
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157064
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161252
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161377
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161377
--- Comment #18 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #17)
If the idea is to add this bug as another duplicate of bug 46448: please don't.
Please read comment 9, and comment 16. Together, they show that this one c
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161377
--- Comment #17 from Heiko Tietze ---
Then I suggest to add this request too.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161252
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|122497 |101258
--- Comment #4 from Heiko
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161252
QA Administrators changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard| QA:needsComment|
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161252
Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||122497
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161090
QA Administrators changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard| QA:needsComment|
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161093
--- Comment #4 from kurt.nordb...@protonmail.com
---
This is an interesting idea, but I'm unsure of the details, particularly
exactly how to specify the "emphasis" entries. The second approach would be
cleaner, but also might mean of-pie
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161377
--- Comment #16 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu)
---
Just noting that bug 46448 has at least three duplicates that ask for the exact
same thing, making it easy to use ISO 8601 as an override of the locale's
default date format: bug 149320,
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161377
--- Comment #15 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #14)
Of course no! Comment 11 was only discussing comment 10, which extended the
original proposal. Why would that make the rest suddenly WFM???
--
You are r
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161377
--- Comment #14 from Heiko Tietze ---
Yes, there it is. WFM?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161377
--- Comment #13 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #12)
Right. In case of Writer, the Format list has "Additional formats" element.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161134
--- Comment #6 from Heiko Tietze ---
You may also enter in the formula bar ="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/";
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161090
--- Comment #1 from Heiko Tietze ---
Made a suggestion on bug 161093 that might solve this ticket too.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161377
--- Comment #12 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #11)
> IMO the proposed checkbox is not needed, one already needs to use explicitly
> chosen formats when they create fixed-looking documents.
This would be o
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161377
--- Comment #11 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Eike Rathke from comment #10)
> Also, when activated there should be a second option (default on) to
> actually apply the ISO format to newly entered date(+time) cells to make it
> persi
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161090
QA Administrators changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161134
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Status|UNCO
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161134
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||libreoffice-ux-advise
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161377
--- Comment #10 from Eike Rathke ---
Also, when activated there should be a second option (default on) to actually
apply the ISO format to newly entered date(+time) cells to make it persistent
even when loaded in a version or setting with
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161377
Eike Rathke changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161377
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161251
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|needsUXEva
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161251
--- Comment #7 from Heiko Tietze ---
Created attachment 194563
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=194563&action=edit
Screenshot MSO
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161204
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |rafael.palma.l...@gmail.com
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160983
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval |
CC|libreoffice-u
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161223
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|UNCONF
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161192
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161192
--- Comment #5 from Dominik Lenné ---
bug 158724 deals with the insertion part of moving something, this is a special
case of my suggestion to leave alone any formatting whatsoever.
same with bug 64028, afaics, which deals with the cutti
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160983
--- Comment #16 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Justin L from comment #14)
> You definitely want to have row height automatically calculated for a CSV
> import, since CSV cannot possibly specify a height for any row.
The conclusion
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161251
--- Comment #6 from Cor Nouws ---
I've always experienced MsOffice way of presenting this a great example of
mis-information by sheer overload and complexity. Don't do this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161192
--- Comment #4 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu)
---
Thanks Heiko.
Dominik, maybe you'd rather see this report marked as duplicate of bug 64028,
as that feature would be a step in the direction of what you're hoping for? (At
least, reducing
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161377
--- Comment #7 from `{third: "Beedell", first: "Roke"}`{.JSON5}
<1c4cm...@rokejulianlockhart.addy.io> ---
(In reply to Wolfgang Jäger from comment #6)
> (In reply to Stéphane Guillou (stragu) from comment #5)
> > ...
> > I guess we should
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161377
Wolfgang Jäger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j...@psilosoph.de
--- Comment #
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161377
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||libreoffice-ux-advise
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161192
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gautamsahil1...@gmail.com
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161411
--- Comment #5 from Heiko Tietze ---
If we end up in a verbose label, I suggest to keep a short label and have the
explanatory text in a tooltip.
("aka" might become a migraine for l10n)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161192
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||libreoffice-ux-advise
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161411
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vsfo...@libreoffice.org
--- Com
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161411
--- Comment #3 from Tuomas Hietala ---
Yes, "Basic Latin" is correct in the sense that it's the official name of the
Unicode block. But if you don't know it's a name of a Unicode block (and I
think most users don't), there's a lot of room
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158587
ady changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||larry...@163.com
--- Comment #11 from ady
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160657
Buovjaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|target:24.8.0 |target:24.8.0
|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161364
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||113136
See Also|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161364
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161395
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |
|.freedesktop.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161395
--- Comment #3 from Commit Notification
---
Heiko Tietze committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/199ffecd9586d3a8c3365bdbc979c93600f25899
Resolves tdf#161395 - Re
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161395
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||target:24.8.0
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161395
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161393
--- Comment #2 from Heiko Tietze ---
Date picker are a popular topic for UI/UX designer and you find a large number
of guides, example, tutorials etc. in the Internet. And funny examples for bad
usability.
I support the idea of a direct
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161411
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tuomas.hiet...@iki.fi
--- Comment
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161395
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||balazs.varga...@gmail.com,
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161411
Gabor Kelemen (allotropia) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||libreoffice-ux-advis
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161395
Telesto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needsUXEval
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161393
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needsUXEval
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131253
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://ask.libreoffi
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131253
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.document
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161155
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||113113
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161155
--- Comment #2 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Tracey from comment #0)
> I noticed that when I am paging through sheets, that when I get to the
> beginning or end it just loops around (this is GOOD!).
But not seen as good by everyone /
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161155
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.document
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145324
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.document
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161378
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|103342 |161389, 113438
Referenced Bugs
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161378
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161378
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://css-tricks.com/css-
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161093
--- Comment #3 from Heiko Tietze ---
Created attachment 194515
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=194515&action=edit
Chart type selection
I'm rather concerned about the dialog than some second line.
But aren't t
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161378
--- Comment #1 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #0)
> * The UI does not represent the nature of the font info
Whatever that means it's not a user-centric design.
> * One can type in multiple font families...
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161147
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval |
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161147
--- Comment #3 from QA Administrators ---
[Automated Action] NeedInfo-To-Unconfirmed
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161378
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||103342
See Also|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161147
--- Comment #2 from Orwel ---
Hi,
thank you for the response. I often do not use automatic hyphenation in
documents. But sometimes I only need to hyphenate one word (e.g. if it has 20
or more letters), so I want to be able to do manual hy
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161147
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||libreoffice-ux-advise
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161093
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needsUXEval
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161223
--- Comment #13 from Eike Rathke ---
No, it could not. For one, expression calculation happens independent of
rendering; second, expression calculation _never_ renders anything; third, such
function would only get in the way when other im
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160858
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161082
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval |
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153309
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|libreoffice-
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161029
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Writer |Documentation
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161029
--- Comment #5 from Heiko Tietze ---
Created attachment 194474
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=194474&action=edit
Screenshot MSO
We discussed the topic in the design meeting. Those examples as provided by MSO
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161037
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|UNCONF
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161223
--- Comment #12 from David ---
One approach could be function, kind of htmlrender()
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95274
--- Comment #69 from daniel.scha...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Michael Bauer from comment #68)
> Can someone explain to me how in this scenario I force LO to
> a) use a language that I cannot currently set (because it's not offering it
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95274
--- Comment #68 from Michael Bauer ---
>=
>Language(s) used in current document/selection/paragraph:
>English (UK)
>☑ French (France)
>More ...
>-
>Recently used langu
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95274
--- Comment #67 from daniel.scha...@gmail.com ---
The point of "recent languages" is that those would be languages the users
chose themselves (for the current document). But, I get that showing only
"languages currently in use" has its appe
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161082
--- Comment #4 from Justin L ---
-1 that would be awful. Every time I print I set the printing options once, and
then print multiple times, changing only the number of pages to print (and the
range of pages to print). The number of copies
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161223
--- Comment #11 from Eike Rathke ---
This should by no means go into the formula expression engine, a spreadsheet
function would be a wrong approach to render things.
Instead, a cell attribute could indicate that the cell content or form
901 - 1000 of 22281 matches
Mail list logo