subject:"\[Bug 161234\] Issues with the new cell outline in Calc 24.8"

[Bug 161234] Issues with the new cell outline in Calc 24.8

2024-05-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161234 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda

[Bug 161234] Issues with the new cell outline in Calc 24.8

2024-05-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161234 Rafael Lima changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |rafael.palma.l...@gmail.com

[Bug 161234] Issues with the new cell outline in Calc 24.8

2024-05-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161234 --- Comment #11 from ady --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #10) > 1px is 10% of the total cell height at 25% but 0.01 at 600%. To make the > frame clearly outstanding from the cell content you need to adjust the > distance accord

[Bug 161234] Issues with the new cell outline in Calc 24.8

2024-05-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161234 --- Comment #10 from Heiko Tietze --- (In reply to ady from comment #7) > (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #6) > > I don't see an absolute value as a solution > If I may ask, why? 1px is 10% of the total cell height at 25% but 0.01

[Bug 161234] Issues with the new cell outline in Calc 24.8

2024-05-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161234 --- Comment #9 from Rafael Lima --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #6) > I don't see an absolute value as a solution; a slightly smaller > multiplicator might be okay. Feel free to hack it. Thanks for the pointer... I'll try to c

[Bug 161234] Issues with the new cell outline in Calc 24.8

2024-05-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161234 --- Comment #8 from ady --- (In reply to Stéphane Guillou (stragu) from comment #5) > I was referring to the square not following the rectangle and eventually > getting disconnected at higher zoom levels. So it is also about the distance

[Bug 161234] Issues with the new cell outline in Calc 24.8

2024-05-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161234 --- Comment #7 from ady --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #6) > I don't see an absolute value as a solution Please forgive my ignorance. If I may ask, why? What's the reasoning? I think of the active-cell line marker in a simil

[Bug 161234] Issues with the new cell outline in Calc 24.8

2024-05-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161234 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Version|24.8.0.0 alpha0+|3.3.0 release --- Comment #6 from

[Bug 161234] Issues with the new cell outline in Calc 24.8

2024-05-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161234 --- Comment #5 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) --- (In reply to ady from comment #4) > I don't understand what is described here as "not drawn correctly". I was referring to the square not following the rectangle and eventually getting di

[Bug 161234] Issues with the new cell outline in Calc 24.8

2024-05-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161234 --- Comment #4 from ady --- (In reply to Stéphane Guillou (stragu) from comment #1) > (In reply to Rafael Lima from comment #0) > > 1) The square used for dragging is not drawn correctly, and if the zoom is > > above 220% it gets disconne

[Bug 161234] Issues with the new cell outline in Calc 24.8

2024-05-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161234 --- Comment #3 from Rafael Lima --- (In reply to Stéphane Guillou (stragu) from comment #1) > Wouldn't this be an issue at lower zoom levels? I don't think this would be an issue... I tested it in 30% zoom and it looks fine, because the