https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279
--- Comment #35 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #34)
> The combobox state depends on the checkbox- that's quite obvious to me.
Me too. But it seemed like the relationships could be improved.
> it
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279
--- Comment #34 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #33)
> The relation between checkbox "Page line-spacing" and combobox Reference
> style is not obvious in current design.
The combobox state depends on the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279
--- Comment #33 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk ---
(In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #32)
> There is a difference between page style and paragraph style. I thing the
> label "Follow Page Line Spacing" and checkbox "Activate" describes
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279
--- Comment #32 from Regina Henschel ---
There is a difference between page style and paragraph style. I thing the label
"Follow Page Line Spacing" and checkbox "Activate" describes the purpose
better.
When you enable "Page
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279
--- Comment #31 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #29)
> Yes, plus a (lengthy) tooltip that might be better suited for the extended
> tip.
Whoops, I misinterpreted.
No opinion (i.e., happy to do it
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279
--- Comment #30 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #29)
Summarizing:
1. Will use: Page line-spacing.
2. Will make this consistent in UI for:
a. Page format (pageformatpage.ui)
b. Paragraph and
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279
--- Comment #29 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #26)
> Q1. As I understand, only the label has changed from "Register-True" to
> "Page line spacing". No functionality change. Is that correct?
Yes, plus a
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279
sdc.bla...@youmail.dk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279
--- Comment #17 from pedro.silva ---
Created attachment 154472
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=154472=edit
Proposal: using the well know line spacing term
Since the base line term didn't get that much support
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279
--- Comment #16 from pedro.silva ---
Created attachment 154471
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=154471=edit
How page dialog looks know (LO 6.3)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279
--- Comment #15 from pedro.silva ---
(In reply to Olivier Hallot from comment #14)
> (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #11)
> > I doubt that "Referenced line spacing" is more informative than
> > "Register-true". It would be more
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279
--- Comment #14 from Olivier Hallot ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #11)
> I doubt that "Referenced line spacing" is more informative than
> "Register-true". It would be more helpful to take Stuart's background
> expertise
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279
--- Comment #13 from V Stuart Foote ---
Created attachment 153922
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=153922=edit
Text of ODF 1.2 standard for 20.328 and 20.329
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279
--- Comment #12 from pedro.silva ---
As Register line spacing / Reference style(In reply to Heiko Tietze from
comment #11)
> I doubt that "Referenced line spacing" is more informative than
> "Register-true". It would be more helpful to
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279
Cor Nouws changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unspecified |Inherited From OOo
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||99525
--- Comment #9 from V
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279
--- Comment #8 from pedro.silva ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #7)
> Obviously we do not implement a vertical grid typesetting framework on which
> objects can be aligned.
Understood.
> Rather, we describe a "Reference"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rb.hensc...@t-online.de,
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279
--- Comment #7 from V Stuart Foote ---
Obviously we do not implement a vertical grid typesetting framework on which
objects can be aligned.
Rather, we describe a "Reference" paragraph style--font and leading--that
establishes a text
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279
--- Comment #6 from QA Administrators ---
[Automated Action] NeedInfo-To-Unconfirmed
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279
QA Administrators changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED
Ever
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279
--- Comment #5 from pedro.silva ---
- Meggs' History of Graphic Design (mine is the 5th edition) also mentions
baseline multiple times
- The Elements of Typographic Style by Robert Bringhurst (mine is the 4th
edition) has also some
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279
--- Comment #4 from pedro.silva ---
Created attachment 153840
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=153840=edit
Term used in Scribus
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279
--- Comment #3 from pedro.silva ---
Created attachment 153839
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=153839=edit
Page from the book Thinking with Type by Ellen Lupton, InDesign screenshot
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279
--- Comment #2 from pedro.silva ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #1)
> Do you have references for the term used on other tools, ie. "Scribus, Adobe
> InDesign, etc."?
Yes, I can attach here if you wish. I can also try (at the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279
Xisco Faulí changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
30 matches
Mail list logo
