https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114970
--- Comment #4 from Alexander Ilyin ---
Shift key will be great!
That way you can add even more combinations.
-Shift key in addition to autofill selection (for ascending values) to keep
original formating
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60937
--- Comment #16 from abstatic ---
I have submitted my patch at https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/48026/
Is it okay ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95880
Yousuf Philips (jay) changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98076
Yousuf Philips (jay) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101965
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Lendo ---
*** Bug 114904 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101965
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Lendo ---
I also vote for variant 1) with a 'none' or 'no list' entry in the list styles
list as this would be similar to the 'default character' style (aka
non-character style) in the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114970
Thomas Lendo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113604
Thomas Lendo changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS|Linux (All) |All
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112852
--- Comment #17 from Yousuf Philips (jay) ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #14)
> I suppose that the best is to focus on something like described in comment
> 9. This (or some similar) would *enable* one
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114395
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112852
--- Comment #16 from Miklos Vajna ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #13)
> Miklos, Eike, what do you think about this question?
The simplified situation is that boldness is a tri-state: default (inherit
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53548
Regina Henschel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60937
--- Comment #15 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to abstatic from comment #14)
> I will be looking at the above code pointer and try to fix this.
Great, looking forward your patch. Feel free to ask on IRC; more
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60937
Abhishek Shrivastava changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112852
--- Comment #15 from Heiko Tietze ---
Testing with MSO16:
Created a new test style with just bold, that applied to a word makes it bold
and toggles the toobar button. Directly formatting bold off makes the word
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112852
--- Comment #14 from Mike Kaganski ---
I suppose that the best is to focus on something like described in comment 9.
This (or some similar) would *enable* one to see and understand what is going
on. Without
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112852
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89014
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94425
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96336
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval |
20 matches
Mail list logo