[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 92672] Copying and pasting a numbered list messes up numbering
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92672 --- Comment #3 from Torf documentfoundation@torf.cc --- Joel, my main problem was that I didn't find a way to reset the numbering of the pasted list (I needed two identical copies of the same list including the same numbering, not a consecutive one). In my opinion, CTRL+C, CTRL+V should give you two equal copies. Anything else (e.g. features like copy without formatting or link pasted list with original) should be an advanced option. Thanks for the UX-advise, I'm looking forward to their opinion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 92622] WRITER: context menu Unstyle the text from Styles Formatting
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92622 --- Comment #5 from Philippe Jung phil.j...@free.fr --- I mean that LibreOffice is based on an additive set of styles: one paragraph style plus one character style plus one list style Double Clicking a style is the plus operation If I am not mistaken the only negative operation is Clear all direct formatting So I would like negative operation for any kind of style to that we can change the result without having to remove everything first. = Maybe a no list ( = Default) to the list style + the same for character style would be sufficient ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 91714] Sidebar Could Share Space with Other Toolbars - an enhancement
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91714 Jean-Baptiste Faure jbfa...@libreoffice.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jbfa...@libreoffice.org --- Comment #4 from Jean-Baptiste Faure jbfa...@libreoffice.org --- I agree with your considerations about small screens, but I prefer the more general solution I proposed: bug #33223. The idea is to have the possibility to add toolbars inside the sidebar. Best regards. JBF -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 92686] FEATURE REQUEST: Better UI for keyboard bindings configuration (including two keybindings for the same action)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92686 --- Comment #8 from Cor Nouws c...@nouenoff.nl --- Hi Jakub, (In reply to Jakub Narębski from comment #7) I have created *this* issue because of annoying behavior wrt. adding duplicated keybinding to the same function. This is a separate issue, and I can raise a separate (and quick to fix) bug report. Yes please do. Side note: applying two bindings for the same is easier when you first select the function, without bothering the keys list, and after that selecting the proper key by putting the focus in the list and pressing the desired key. But hard to tell that in the current UI without real help text, I think. There remains long term issue that needs a discussion about best UI for assigning keybindings (for keyboard configuration), for example whether to make it more similar to what MS Word 2007 does, or what Atom editor does. I think there are great improvements in the page that Heiko pointed to. (Alas there is still work to do, as far as I am aware, to solve the negative effect of that re-design on customization of events). Thanks so far! Cor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 92686] FEATURE REQUEST: Better UI for keyboard bindings configuration (including two keybindings for the same action)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92686 Cor Nouws c...@nouenoff.nl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||c...@nouenoff.nl --- Comment #4 from Cor Nouws c...@nouenoff.nl --- (In reply to Jakub Narębski from comment #0) Scrolling through the list of possible keybindings is tedious, compared to MS Word / MS Office (and Atom editor) solution of just entering key we want to assign (the advantage is that you see if it is free or not at first glance). When the focus is in the list with keys, and you hit Ctrl+F, the focus immediately jumpes to that key, showing the info you are looking for.. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 92686] FEATURE REQUEST: Better UI for keyboard bindings configuration (including two keybindings for the same action)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92686 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Narębski jna...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Cor Nouws from comment #4) (In reply to Jakub Narębski from comment #0) Scrolling through the list of possible keybindings is tedious, compared to MS Word / MS Office (and Atom editor) solution of just entering key we want to assign (the advantage is that you see if it is free or not at first glance). When the focus is in the list with keys, and you hit Ctrl+F, the focus immediately jumps to that key, showing the info you are looking for.. What is lacking is small text above this list with e.g. Press key combination you want to change, or something like that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 92686] FEATURE REQUEST: Better UI for keyboard bindings configuration (including two keybindings for the same action)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92686 --- Comment #6 from Cor Nouws c...@nouenoff.nl --- (In reply to Jakub Narębski from comment #5) When the focus is in the list with keys, and you hit Ctrl+F, the focus immediately jumps to that key, showing the info you are looking for.. What is lacking is small text above this list with e.g. Press key combination you want to change, or something like that. That would indeed a better UI. Is it OK for you to make this issue reflect just that suggestion? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 92622] WRITER: context menu Unstyle the text from Styles Formatting
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92622 --- Comment #6 from Cor Nouws c...@nouenoff.nl --- (In reply to Philippe Jung from comment #5) Double Clicking a style is the plus operation If I am not mistaken the only negative operation is Clear all direct formatting Or choose a different (default) style for paragraphs/characters/graphics-frames/pages. So I would like negative operation for any kind of style to that we can change the result without having to remove everything first. That only makes sense for list styles. All other types of styles have no NULL-option, but fall back to the 'Default' style. = Maybe a no list ( = Default) to the list style + the same for character style would be sufficient ? I doubt about the sense for character styles. However a solution could be, in the context menu for list styles, within the Styles pane, the option 'no list style'. OK? Alternatively, if list styles are selected, a button 'no list style' in the tool bar ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 92673] NEW TABLE FUNCTION: Split table Merge table
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92673 --- Comment #5 from Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de --- (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #4) On the Table toolbar the associated .uno command and its dialog has never been available to add as a Visible button, or as a user Customization. They have ever been available for customization and still are available. Find the commands Merge Table and Split Table in the category Table. It is true, that they have no associated icon, but that applies to other commands too. I see the issue as Worksforme. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 92673] NEW TABLE FUNCTION: Split table Merge table
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92673 --- Comment #6 from V Stuart Foote vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu --- (In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #5) They have ever been available for customization and still are available. Find the commands Merge Table and Split Table in the category Table. It is true, that they have no associated icon, but that applies to other commands too. I see the issue as Worksforme. Oops, right you are--they are there and can be added without issue, no icon. I was looking for them as an unchecked command already on the tool bar, and forgot to search the Add dialog. Still with removal of split table from the context menu, wouldn't it make sense to create a pair of Icons, and have them resident as checked (or unchecked) tools on the Table toolbar? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 92628] EDITING: Double click in formula sometimes gets wrong word boundaries
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92628 Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|medium |low CC||jmadero@gmail.com, ||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org Component|Calc|ux-advise Hardware|x86-64 (AMD64) |All Version|4.4.4.3 release |Inherited From OOo --- Comment #1 from Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com --- I'm asking UX for input on this one. FWIW - same behavior in 3.3 so setting the version to inherited from OOo Also setting to: Minor - slows down but does not prevent high quality work; Low - default for minor bugs @UX - this seems like a user preference issue and I can imagine others disagreeing. I'll leave it in your capable hands to determine if we'll implement this or if we'll close it as WONTFIX. Thanks for reporting! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 92686] FEATURE REQUEST: Better UI for keyboard bindings configuration (including two keybindings for the same action)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92686 --- Comment #2 from Heiko Tietze heiko.tie...@user-prompt.com --- Have you read this, Jakub? http://user-prompt.com/how-to-make-libreoffice-customization-usable/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 92686] FEATURE REQUEST: Better UI for keyboard bindings configuration (including two keybindings for the same action)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92686 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Narębski jna...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #2) Have you read this, Jakub? http://user-prompt.com/how-to-make-libreoffice-customization-usable/ No I haven't. Thanks for pointing it. I especially like the fuzzy search idea for functions and for groups / menus. There are however a few issues that this blog post doesn't touch. 1.) There is no information anywhere that you can press a key combination to go to it, to appropriate line in Shortcut keys - it should be in a label, or at least in a hint. 2.) It doesn't touch the current difficulty of assigning second key to an action. 3.) There is also an usability issue (that I forgot to mention) that clicking 'OK' instead of 'Modify' after selecting function looses all your work on the last shortcut. Perhaps better solution would be to click Modify first, then open a wizard to select a function... 4.) Ctrl-Alt vs AltGr issue, and inability to assign for example Ctrl-Alt-n or Ctrl-Alt-Shift-N to any function when using Polish keyboard with ń and Ń. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 92622] WRITER: context menu Unstyle the text from Styles Formatting
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92622 Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC||jmadero@gmail.com, ||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org Component|Writer |ux-advise Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #3 from Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com --- I'm not a huge fan of adding more stuff to right click context menu - lots of work has been done to minimize this menu as much as possible. That being said - this is for UX to decide. Pushing to NEW and requesting input. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
