https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156507
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156507
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|102345 |102593
--- Comment #11 from
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156507
--- Comment #10 from خالد حسني ---
If users understand what these characters are, they can use advanced search and
replace to strip them, if they don’t understand what these are then we
shouldn’t be giving them functionality that is
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156507
--- Comment #9 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to خالد حسني from comment #7)
> The notion here is fundamentally flawed, there is no such thing as exotic
> characters in a multilingual and multicultural piece of software, this is
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156507
--- Comment #8 from V Stuart Foote ---
Agree with Khaled as to the impact on text runs of the multitude of scripts
that might be in use. Stripping NPC from text runs does not make sense.
Still think, as in comment 1, better approach is
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156493
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval, topicUI|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94989
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156404
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |heiko.tietze@documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156507
--- Comment #7 from خالد حسني ---
Someone’s exotic character is another one’s essential part of the text.
Removing ZWNJ from Persian text alters its meaning, removing ZWJ from Emoji
sequences alters their meaning, removing Unicode
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156455
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156455
--- Comment #17 from Miklos Vajna ---
OK, with that spelled out, this (having such an UNO command) makes sense to me
if somebody wants to do this. What we want is to allow toggling the "repeating
header" bit in the last rows of the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156455
--- Comment #16 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Miklos Vajna from comment #15)
If you've selected the first non-header row - the command is enabled.
If you've selected the second non-header row - the command is disabled.
If you've
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156455
--- Comment #15 from Miklos Vajna ---
OK, so we would have a disabled state for this new command on header rows which
are non-last. What about non-header rows? If I have two non-header rows, then
the first non-header row would do the
13 matches
Mail list logo
