[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 127279] Register-true with better labelling
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needsUXEval | CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists | |.freedesktop.org| --- Comment #36 from Heiko Tietze --- (In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #35) > but it is ambiguous about which (if any) should be indented more. The checkbox "[ ] Register-true" is clearly placed under Layout settings with a subordinate reference style. Don't see anything ambiguous there. > And what about the "Activate" question?... And the tooltip question, comment > 31? All fine, relabel as suggested, I like "Activate page line-spacing". I suggest to go with a shorter tooltip and a longer extended tip. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 127279] Register-true with better labelling
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279 --- Comment #35 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #34) > The combobox state depends on the checkbox- that's quite obvious to me. Me too. But it seemed like the relationships could be improved. > it has an indentation, which might be increased a bit. We have defined 18pt > in https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Design/Guidelines/PropertyDialog So this means, no change in placement of controls on Page Style dialog, except for indentation? but it is ambiguous about which (if any) should be indented more. And what about the "Activate" question? (i.e., dropping the label in the Paragraph dialog box? and using "Activate page line-spacing") And the tooltip question, comment 31? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 127279] Register-true with better labelling
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279 --- Comment #34 from Heiko Tietze --- (In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #33) > The relation between checkbox "Page line-spacing" and combobox Reference > style is not obvious in current design. The combobox state depends on the checkbox- that's quite obvious to me. And it has an indentation, which might be increased a bit. We have defined 18pt in https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Design/Guidelines/PropertyDialog -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 127279] Register-true with better labelling
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279 --- Comment #33 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- (In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #32) > There is a difference between page style and paragraph style. I thing the > label "Follow Page Line Spacing" and checkbox "Activate" describes the > purpose better. Thanks (as usual) for helpful explanations. So -- is it correctly understood that "activating" the Paragraph dialog has no effect, unless the checkbox is set on the Page dialog? Meanwhile New proposal for Paragraph dialog box: Change "Activate" label (currently present) to "Activate page line-spacing" (and drop the label "Follow Page Line Spacing) (would that work?) New question (for UX people) about Page Style dialog: The relation between checkbox "Page line-spacing" and combobox Reference style is not obvious in current design. Is there a "better" way to communicate the relationships here? For example: Page line-spacing (as separate bold heading in line with Layout Settings) x Activate Set Reference to: (combobox) (or "Set Reference Style to:") (where, as before, combobox is disabled until checkbox is set) Would also give some "visual/verbal" similarity with new proposal for Paragraph dialog. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 127279] Register-true with better labelling
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279 --- Comment #32 from Regina Henschel --- There is a difference between page style and paragraph style. I thing the label "Follow Page Line Spacing" and checkbox "Activate" describes the purpose better. When you enable "Page line-spacing" (register true) in the page style, you have to set a paragraph style as reference, which is used to determine the typographical grid. Example: Set "Textbody" as reference style, and set all space before/after to zero and set line spacing to fix 5mm in style "Textbody". That will result in a 5mm vertical typographical grid. "Activate" in paragraph style means, that the paragraph will be vertically aligned so that the bottom of a line is aligned with the typographical grid line, which is determined by the reference style. The own line spacing defined in the paragraph is only taken as minimum. Example: You have a heading in style "Heading 1", here too with all space before/after set to zero, and this "Heading 1" style has a font, which requires 8mm in height. Then with "Activate" on, the bottom of the heading line will be put to align with the typographical grid line. So the heading gets 2mm space above to the previous textbody paragraph. With "Activate" off, the heading paragraph is placed immediately below the previous textbody paragraph. The textbody paragraph after the heading will be at the same place in both cases. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 127279] Register-true with better labelling
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279 --- Comment #31 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #29) > Yes, plus a (lengthy) tooltip that might be better suited for the extended > tip. Whoops, I misinterpreted. No opinion (i.e., happy to do it either way). Version 1. Leave/use long tooltips (i.e., current form). Version 2. Use new, short tooltip and move current "lengthy" Page format tooltip to extended tooltip. (and same for Paragraph). If Version 2 is used, then seeking advice/proposals for a useful short tooltip. My imagination fails to generate anything meaningful/useful (beyond the proposed label "Use page-line spacing"). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 127279] Register-true with better labelling
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279 --- Comment #30 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #29) Summarizing: 1. Will use: Page line-spacing. 2. Will make this consistent in UI for: a. Page format (pageformatpage.ui) b. Paragraph and Paragraph Style (paraindentspacing.ui) 3. Will replace "Activate" label and drop Heading in Paragraph dialog 4. Will change Attribute name in Find-and-Replace. 5. Will add a longish tooltip for Paragraph. (there is already one for Page Format) Remaining issues: 6. About verbs and checkbox labels. I propose: "Use page line-spacing" instead of "follow" 7. Question about interaction between setting (or not) on Page and Paragraph. (relevant for tooltip and help pages, interpreting bug reports). Is there anyone who is likely to know the answer to this question? (or could give a qualified guess?) If there is a agreement about points 1-6, then I will start to make the relevant patches. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 127279] Register-true with better labelling
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279 --- Comment #29 from Heiko Tietze --- (In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #26) > Q1. As I understand, only the label has changed from "Register-True" to > "Page line spacing". No functionality change. Is that correct? Yes, plus a (lengthy) tooltip that might be better suited for the extended tip. > Q2. Is there a special reason for using "Page line spacing" in Format - Page > - Page, but "Follow Page line spacing" for the paragraph dialogs? Don't think so. > I would propose that "Follow" be dropped in paraindentspacing.ui Using a verb at the beginning makes it more clear in general. How about "Follow page line spacing" everywhere? > or should it be: Page linespacing ? Or "line-spacing" ;-). No opinion on this. > P2. Is there any need for an "Activate" box in the paragraph dialog? Why > not use the same simple form as the Page dialog? Guess it's technically not related to the line spacing and was placed there for in an extra frame. I agree with a simple checkbox. > Q3. I assume setting this for Page will supersede the setting for Paragraph Not sure. Sorry for the delayed reply. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 127279] Register-true with better labelling
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279 sdc.bla...@youmail.dk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org Keywords||needsUXEval -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 127279] Register-true with better labelling
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needsUXEval | CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda |.freedesktop.org|tion.org --- Comment #18 from Heiko Tietze --- Let's follow Pedro's suggestion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 127279] Register-true with better labelling
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279 --- Comment #17 from pedro.silva --- Created attachment 154472 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=154472=edit Proposal: using the well know line spacing term Since the base line term didn't get that much support (even though is used through out typography books and, just discovered, the writer guide itself) here and since the term "Line spacing" is already well-known by the users I tried to simplified this labelling by avoiding the use of any "base line" or "grid" and instead using line spacing and by having it clear what are the elements we are talking about (page vs paragraph) and how they affect our document. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 127279] Register-true with better labelling
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279 --- Comment #16 from pedro.silva --- Created attachment 154471 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=154471=edit How page dialog looks know (LO 6.3) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 127279] Register-true with better labelling
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279 --- Comment #15 from pedro.silva --- (In reply to Olivier Hallot from comment #14) > (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #11) > > I doubt that "Referenced line spacing" is more informative than > > "Register-true". It would be more helpful to take Stuart's background > > expertise into the documentation. What do you think, Olivier? > > To be honest, Register true is very obscure for the average user. Wording in > > https://help.libreoffice.org/6.4/en-US/text/shared/00/0005. > html?DbPAR=SHARED#bm_id3147315 > > does not help at all (e.g. "congruent imprint"). To improve the Help page on > it, please help me on my own questions: > > - When should I mark the RT check box? What do I get? (use case) > - what if I don't use RT? How bad it is? > - A sample image (l10n neutral) showing the differences of using RT and > not... Agreed, I think the best explanation is available in the page 195 of the LibreOffice writer 6.0 Guide but then again when defining the term used to explain is **base line** and **base line grid** which was my initial proposal as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 127279] Register-true with better labelling
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279 --- Comment #14 from Olivier Hallot --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #11) > I doubt that "Referenced line spacing" is more informative than > "Register-true". It would be more helpful to take Stuart's background > expertise into the documentation. What do you think, Olivier? To be honest, Register true is very obscure for the average user. Wording in https://help.libreoffice.org/6.4/en-US/text/shared/00/0005.html?DbPAR=SHARED#bm_id3147315 does not help at all (e.g. "congruent imprint"). To improve the Help page on it, please help me on my own questions: - When should I mark the RT check box? What do I get? (use case) - what if I don't use RT? How bad it is? - A sample image (l10n neutral) showing the differences of using RT and not... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 127279] Register-true with better labelling
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279 --- Comment #13 from V Stuart Foote --- Created attachment 153922 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=153922=edit Text of ODF 1.2 standard for 20.328 and 20.329 http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/v1.2/os/OpenDocument-v1.2-os-part1.html#__RefHeading__1420116_253892949 So, while we can adjust the UI for better UX, we likely will always drag along the old printing/binding etymology. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 127279] Register-true with better labelling
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279 --- Comment #12 from pedro.silva --- As Register line spacing / Reference style(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #11) > I doubt that "Referenced line spacing" is more informative than > "Register-true". It would be more helpful to take Stuart's background > expertise into the documentation. What do you think, Olivier? As visible in the discussion I think it's reasonable to say that Register-true is far from ideal and I'm ok with any of the stated proposals. I'm mostly concerned with the UX aspect of it and if, as a plus, the feature gets more discoverable/used just because of labelling then I think it's awesome. Stuart suggested: Register line spacing / Reference style Which I have no problem with (just a few worries which I have already elaborate on that) but overall sounds good. I think. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 127279] Register-true with better labelling
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC||olivier.hallot@libreoffice. ||org --- Comment #11 from Heiko Tietze --- I doubt that "Referenced line spacing" is more informative than "Register-true". It would be more helpful to take Stuart's background expertise into the documentation. What do you think, Olivier? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 127279] Register-true with better labelling
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279 Cor Nouws changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unspecified |Inherited From OOo CC||c...@nouenoff.nl -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 127279] Register-true with better labelling
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||99525 --- Comment #9 from V Stuart Foote --- Actually, (In reply to pedro.silva from comment #8) > - Align to fixed Baseline / Reference Style: > - Fixed Baseline / Reference Style: > - Referenced line spacing / Paragraph style: > > I think the 3rd would be a good because not only it's more clear it uses the > same terminology from the Paragraph dialogue (Paragraph Styles > Indents & > Spacing). To pair with this, in the Paragraph dialogue the group titled > "Register-true" with the checkbox "Activate" would become: > > - Referenced line spacing / Activate Actually rather than "reference" (a paragraph style applied against the page) the concept would be "registration"--now common in alignment of offset press CMYK and half-tone image print work. But here it predates that considerably coming from the folding of large folio paper sizes to impose the signatures with correct sequence and alignment (front to back and across pages) -- when accomplished the printing and binding is "register-true" and "folded with the print". But we have little support for imposing and printing 'folio, quarto, octavo, duodecimo, sextodecimo' layouts. Just look at the Print dialog's pages per sheet and order where we can not impose a multi-page print layout that would correctly _fold_. That and a lack of means to provide bleeds, trim, and registration marks means we can't directly perform DTP--and "register-true" while correct is not really appropriate. What we are able to do well is provide correct page to page registration of textual content. As our pages are composed dynamically when paragraphs are rendered the printing on pages will not register--page to page, column to column. But when we enable "register-true" on page styles, and allow individual paragraphs to pick up the alignment from the selected reference paragraph's line height (its font height, internal leading, external leading) as a baseline the documents textual content will register as if "imposed" correctly and then "folded with the print", trimmed, and bound. So, while "register-true" is a correct label--agree its etymology is obscure and is really not helpful UX--but the action is still registration. Rather than Reference, I would suggest: Register line spacing / Reference style Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99525 [Bug 99525] [META] Enhance Draw's DTP capabilities -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 127279] Register-true with better labelling
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279 --- Comment #8 from pedro.silva --- (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #7) > Obviously we do not implement a vertical grid typesetting framework on which > objects can be aligned. Understood. > Rather, we describe a "Reference" paragraph style--font and leading--that > establishes a text line height. And effectively sets text "baselines" as > vertically filled from top down and applied within margins of a page style. > > Multiple paragraphs on multiple pages will be aligned to that baseline when > those paragraphs (selectively) are 'Register true' enabled. > > And beleive different page styles (each with a "Reference style" and > corresponding line height/baselines) can be defined (pre-defined in > template) for use in complex documents. > > This is a different approach to that of InDesign or even Scribus. Agreed, it is most def. a different approach and I see no problem with that. In this bug what I tried to propose was a better labelling. As you see when describing the functionality you use the word Baseline (let us forget for a minute about the "Grid"). Also I never encounter any educational material on graphic design, typography or simply about print with that term but all of these do have baselines as a though term. Moreover and as you see in https://help.libreoffice.org/Writer/Printing_Register-true the current term is not really about an element or characteristic of the text/page but rather an ideal to be achieved "This term refers to the congruent imprint of the lines within a type area[...]" so it's kinda odd that is being used as a label for an on/off toggle. Nevertheless I hear you and so here are some options that could be a better fit than the current “Register-true”/“Reference Style:” in Page Style > Page (tab): - Align to fixed Baseline / Reference Style: - Fixed Baseline / Reference Style: - Referenced line spacing / Paragraph style: I think the 3rd would be a good because not only it's more clear it uses the same terminology from the Paragraph dialogue (Paragraph Styles > Indents & Spacing). To pair with this, in the Paragraph dialogue the group titled "Register-true" with the checkbox "Activate" would become: - Referenced line spacing / Activate -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 127279] Register-true with better labelling
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rb.hensc...@t-online.de, ||vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu URL||https://ask.libreoffice.org ||/en/question/79746/register ||-true-grid-settings/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 127279] Register-true with better labelling
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279 --- Comment #7 from V Stuart Foote --- Obviously we do not implement a vertical grid typesetting framework on which objects can be aligned. Rather, we describe a "Reference" paragraph style--font and leading--that establishes a text line height. And effectively sets text "baselines" as vertically filled from top down and applied within margins of a page style. Multiple paragraphs on multiple pages will be aligned to that baseline when those paragraphs (selectively) are 'Register true' enabled. And beleive different page styles (each with a "Reference style" and corresponding line height/baselines) can be defined (pre-defined in template) for use in complex documents. This is a different approach to that of InDesign or even Scribus. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 127279] Register-true with better labelling
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279 --- Comment #6 from QA Administrators --- [Automated Action] NeedInfo-To-Unconfirmed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 127279] Register-true with better labelling
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED Ever confirmed|1 |0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 127279] Register-true with better labelling
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279 --- Comment #5 from pedro.silva --- - Meggs' History of Graphic Design (mine is the 5th edition) also mentions baseline multiple times - The Elements of Typographic Style by Robert Bringhurst (mine is the 4th edition) has also some mention of baseline (also leading and vertical motion) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 127279] Register-true with better labelling
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279 --- Comment #4 from pedro.silva --- Created attachment 153840 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=153840=edit Term used in Scribus -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 127279] Register-true with better labelling
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279 --- Comment #3 from pedro.silva --- Created attachment 153839 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=153839=edit Page from the book Thinking with Type by Ellen Lupton, InDesign screenshot -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 127279] Register-true with better labelling
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279 --- Comment #2 from pedro.silva --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #1) > Do you have references for the term used on other tools, ie. "Scribus, Adobe > InDesign, etc."? Yes, I can attach here if you wish. I can also try (at the best of my abilities) to list here common typography/graphic design manuals/books where the term used is always Baseline Text. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 127279] Register-true with better labelling
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO Ever confirmed|0 |1 See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12 ||7280 --- Comment #1 from Heiko Tietze --- Do you have references for the term used on other tools, ie. "Scribus, Adobe InDesign, etc."? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 127279] Register-true with better labelling
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127279 Xisco Faulí changed: What|Removed |Added CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org, ||xiscofa...@libreoffice.org Keywords||needsUXEval -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
