https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140360
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||103459
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
||.freedesktop.org,
||rayk...@gmail.com,
||vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu
Ever confirmed|0 |1
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13
||1947
Keywords||needsUXEval
--- Comment #1 from V Stuart Foote ---
Not clear how much work this would require, but it is probably worth doing in
any case.
And, it would need to be consistent for all SB Decks, so I guess the action of
the control here would be that *all* Sidebar Decks would be reworked and
receive the "slide to collapse" of the original SB implementation.
Result as a counter to the default minimum, and minimum per deck (no hidden
controls), the new control allowing hiding and eventual collapse of decks would
be configured from expert configuration.
Personally I always preferred the original implementation that allowed the
decks to slide hiding controls before full collapse. We removed that feature in
setting a SB minimum width, and per deck minimum. This effectively would
restore that as a non-default option.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103459
[Bug 103459] [META] Sidebar UI and UX bugs and enhancements
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
