https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156507
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156507
--- Comment #13 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #12)
> With +F10 exposing NPC, an +X toggle will show Unicode for the
> specific NPC at the text cursor--and then toggle it back. Then knowing the
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156507
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156507
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|102345 |102593
--- Comment #11 from
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156507
--- Comment #10 from خالد حسني ---
If users understand what these characters are, they can use advanced search and
replace to strip them, if they don’t understand what these are then we
shouldn’t be giving them functionality that is
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156507
--- Comment #9 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to خالد حسني from comment #7)
> The notion here is fundamentally flawed, there is no such thing as exotic
> characters in a multilingual and multicultural piece of software, this is
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156507
--- Comment #8 from V Stuart Foote ---
Agree with Khaled as to the impact on text runs of the multitude of scripts
that might be in use. Stripping NPC from text runs does not make sense.
Still think, as in comment 1, better approach is
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156507
--- Comment #7 from خالد حسني ---
Someone’s exotic character is another one’s essential part of the text.
Removing ZWNJ from Persian text alters its meaning, removing ZWJ from Emoji
sequences alters their meaning, removing Unicode
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156507
--- Comment #6 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #5)
> This should be rather solved with the F dialog, ideally per regular
> expression.
That's only because you're thinking about the advanced users. I have
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156507
--- Comment #5 from Heiko Tietze ---
This should be rather solved with the F dialog, ideally per regular
expression. Any hard-coded procedure is likely to fail for some reason, as
carefully it was implemented. And such a function
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156507
QA Administrators changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard| QA:needsComment|
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156507
--- Comment #4 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
As for alternatives/complements to my suggestion, we could also think of:
* Having a option to sanitize input filters of such characters.
* Ability to traverse just these characters with some kind
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156507
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Ability to remove all |Ability to remove
13 matches
Mail list logo
