https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95861
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95861
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||shaforost...@gmail.com
--- Comme
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95861
--- Comment #18 from V Stuart Foote ---
Well there has not been an aggressive move to strip out the Writer Web mode,
but that probably should proceed.
Filter import/export of HTML5/css3, and style sheet support in general--have
not seen a
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95861
--- Comment #17 from Jens Troeger ---
Any update on this issue?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95861
--- Comment #16 from Jens Troeger ---
(In reply to Buovjaga from comment #15)
> You have a lot of experience in C++ and this renovation work is in your
> business interest, so I think you are the perfect person to address it.
Not sure wha
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95861
--- Comment #15 from Buovjaga ---
(In reply to Jens Troeger from comment #14)
> Since my Bug 122613 has been closed as a duplicate of this one (uh, well,
> really?) I am curious about the status here. Anybody out to address at least
> some
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95861
--- Comment #14 from Jens Troeger ---
Since my Bug 122613 has been closed as a duplicate of this one (uh, well,
really?) I am curious about the status here. Anybody out to address at least
some of the aspects of this bug?
--
You are rece
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95861
Xisco FaulĂ changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jens.troe...@light-speed.de
--- Com
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95861
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ad...@qso.com
--- Comment #12 fr
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95861
--- Comment #11 from Volga ---
This functionaly would be helpful for some other functionality such as EPUB and
SVG. EPUB is surely using HTML based structure and CSS styling, SVG 2 is
including integrations CSS, HTML5, and WOFF, our improv
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95861
--- Comment #10 from Volga ---
This functionaly would be helpful for some other functionality such as EPUB and
SVG. EPUB is surely using HTML based structure and CSS styling, SVG 2 is
including integrations CSS, HTML5, and WOFF, our improv
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95861
Buovjaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gerry.trep...@googlemail.co
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95861
--- Comment #8 from Tomaz Vajngerl ---
(In reply to Gerry from comment #7)
> I oppose the removal of the web view and HTML source view/editing. It is a
> quite handy feature, which I frequently use and really like. I am quite sure
> that o
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95861
--- Comment #7 from Gerry ---
(In reply to David Tardon from comment #3)
> (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #2)
> I suggest we strip the whole Web module out.
I have just seen this proposal here to remove Writer/Web (web view and
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95861
--- Comment #6 from V Stuart Foote ---
Hmm, David and Tor have a lot more weight than I, if you can get the ESC to
agree--then *please* strip out the Writer/Web mode! The now broken support for
HTML 4 leads only to frustration with trying
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95861
--- Comment #5 from jan d ---
I agree with keeping HTML Im- and Export since it is a format that allows to
structure texts well and can be read almost everywhere.
I also think we should not aim for WYSIWYG editing.
From a usability point
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95861
--- Comment #4 from Tor Lillqvist ---
> I suggest we strip the whole Web module out.
I agree wholeheartedly.
> The HTML import/export should
> stay.
I would kill even that. Or at least keep it just one way, so people don't try
to be cle
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95861
--- Comment #3 from David Tardon ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #2)
> @David T., *
>
> >Should libreoffice even aspire to be an HTML editor?
>
> It is not an aspiration, rather seeking to restore that capability.
But do we
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95861
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95861
--- Comment #2 from V Stuart Foote ---
@David T., *
>Should libreoffice even aspire to be an HTML editor?
It is not an aspiration, rather seeking to restore that capability.
The HTML Web component remains implemented--and its "source vi
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95861
David Tardon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dtar...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95861
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unspecified |4.2.0.4 release
--
You are rece
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95861
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
23 matches
Mail list logo