https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148673
--- Comment #7 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #6)
> It could be done; however,
So...exploring the idea a little further...
> or that two "identical" toolbars pop
> up sometimes - when in numbered
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148673
--- Comment #6 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #5)
> What about making two separate context-sensitive toolbars -- one for
> "Chapter Headings" and one for "Lists"?
It could be done; however, I believe it
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148673
--- Comment #8 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #7)
No strong opinion on this ... except one: please stop using "headings" here.
There *already* exists a confusion introduced by "outline" and "chapter"
meaning
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141452
Mike Kaganski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141452
--- Comment #21 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #1)
> I think "Chapter" is the only way to make in unambiguous.
Heh, if only it were true...
I strongly believe this proposal should be done, and
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141452
--- Comment #22 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #21)
> I strongly believe this proposal should be done, and tdf#104151 was badly
> misguided.
Sorry, tdf#107573 was meant.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147837
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Blocks|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141452
--- Comment #23 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #21)
> I strongly believe this proposal should be done, and tdf#104151 was badly
> misguided.
So, it seems I'm in rare agreement withe Mike on something :-)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148673
--- Comment #5 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #4)
> Please note that name change is *essential* for the OP
Ok. So a next logical step would be to ask:
What about making two separate
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148513
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsDevAdvice, needsUXEval |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141452
Mike Kaganski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148320
--- Comment #4 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #3)
> I don't see a pattern.
Can you explain that phrase?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148320
--- Comment #5 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #2)
> ... is not consistent with other behavior in LO.
I don't see this pattern, meaning consistency in terms of input fields that are
in use if a checkbox is
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141452
--- Comment #24 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #23)
Please note that you try to force some *dictionary* meaning of terms into
Writer. This is wrong.
Outline, chapter, and heading are OK to (and *must*)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148629
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval |difficultyMedium, easyHack,
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148643
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148320
--- Comment #6 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #5)
> I don't see this pattern, meaning consistency in terms of input fields that
> are in use if a checkbox is checked or otherwise mean empty content.
Ah.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141452
--- Comment #25 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #24)
> * Outline is a concept of paragraphs having the associated levels, creating
> corresponding structure.
My poor English made that point rather bad.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148465
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148593
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|needsUXEval
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148272
--- Comment #7 from Heiko Tietze ---
Created attachment 179725
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=179725=edit
Example
Using numbers instead of literals works the same (and without the locale bug).
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148469
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148591
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148320
--- Comment #3 from Heiko Tietze ---
Better compare with caption and if you leave the field empty you get an empty
caption. Wouldn't expect anything else. Admittedly, the checkbox is convenient
(and we have space) but I don't see a
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148597
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikekagan...@hotmail.com
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148320
--- Comment #7 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #6)
> ... the user is unlikely to realize that an empty title means no-title
Don't think so. And, as Dieter pointed out, we have a preview.
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148272
--- Comment #8 from Charles Valente ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #7)
> Created attachment 179725 [details]
> Example
>
> Using numbers instead of literals works the same (and without the locale
> bug).
Thank you for your
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148728
Xisco Faulí changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needsUXEval
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148732
Telesto changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148673
--- Comment #9 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #8)
> No strong opinion on this ...
Aww..that is disappointing. I was sure that at least you would like the idea
of removing the offer to apply DF
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148723
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needsUXEval
Ever
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127294
--- Comment #79 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk ---
Proposal for a new ToD:
Never use certain arrow styles? Remove them with the Delete button on the
Format > Text Box and Shape > Line > Arrow Styles tab.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148447
Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needsUXEval
Whiteboard|
33 matches
Mail list logo
