https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158958
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158958
--- Comment #19 from ady ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #18)
> The content should be excluded
> from the comment indicator area of the cell so that it doesn't overlap its
> area.
That's unacceptable. The limitation is on
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158958
--- Comment #18 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
Didn't we discuss this issue last time the comment marker came up?
Anyway, I say it's not the size, it's the fact that the cell contents is
allowed to overlap so much of the marker. The content
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158958
Cor Nouws changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@nouenoff.nl
--- Comment #17
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158958
--- Comment #16 from Stephane Quenson ---
As a user of Calc and contributor to the forum https://ask.libreoffice.org/, I
support the idea to have an expert option that would allow to define the shape,
its size and color.
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158958
--- Comment #15 from Heiko Tietze ---
-1
* user-defined symbol
* revert the patch
* some default margin to make space for the symbol
-0.5
* UNO command to toggle the indicator on/off
* less obtrusive default color
+0.5
* different
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158958
--- Comment #14 from ady ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #11)
> (In reply to ady from comment #9)
>
> Yes it does make your objections invalid--UX decision was made for bug
> 153106 and a revert of the bug 91415 zoom
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158958
--- Comment #13 from inso...@yandex.ru ---
Yes, marker is drawn behind the cell's data values, the cells values are
visible.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158958
--- Comment #12 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to insonus from comment #10)
Believe the current zoom responsive triangle marker is already drawn behind the
cell's data values. The cells values are visible and not obscured, though
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158958
--- Comment #11 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to ady from comment #9)
Yes it does make your objections invalid--UX decision was made for bug 153106
and a revert of the bug 91415 zoom responsive triangle marking for comments
remains,
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158958
--- Comment #10 from inso...@yandex.ru ---
I think we should assume that the data is primary. The comment indicator should
in no case interfere with the data at any viewing scale. I think a better
option would be to give the user the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158958
--- Comment #9 from ady ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #8)
> No, bug 153106 was closed => WF for the reversion of the marker, with
> expectation there would be an UNO enhancement ticket to control the Comment
> indicator
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158958
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158958
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vsfo...@libreoffice.org
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158958
--- Comment #7 from ady ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #6)
> See my bug 91415 comment 6.
And don't forget about bug 153106. Carefully written words, never read with the
required attention. So, here we are. Am I surprised?
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158958
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||101216
See Also|
16 matches
Mail list logo
