On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 05:02:06PM -0500, Arno Teigseth wrote:
Hi
I have
LibreOffice 3.3.0
OOO330m9 (Build:1)
libreoffice-build 3.2.99.2
It hangs when I do libreoffice extension.oxt from the command line. No
error messages on stdout.
Adding the extension from the menu
I am not sure about that but mordaci on irc gave me this link
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31424
What is annoying is that i cant see the names of the options given when
using a dark theme as it switches the text to white. LO isn't only
affected by this kopete is as well, but
Am I the only one finding the current status bar pretty much useless?
About the only thing I actually use there, is the zoom slidebar (and I
wouldn't use that if I were able to have a single set 'optimal' zoom
button in my toolbar which doesn't seem possible).
- What annoys me most is the
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 17:09 -0500, Arno Teigseth wrote:
I have installed just a few languages, but still all the wrong
languages show up.
As far as I recall, those langauges are from the language guessing
feature, and hopefully are in order of most likely language first and so
on.
Could it be
Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
Am I the only one finding the current status bar pretty much useless?
Nope. I hear you, pretty much unconditionally. Adding UX tag
Cc-ing my favourite UX homie. :)
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
pgphW56AvlvY5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I have installed just a few languages, but still all the wrong
languages show up.
When you say you have installed just a few languages, do you mean in the
LibreOffice Windows installer? There you select what *user interface* languages
are available, not what languages LibreOffice has writing
sending again ( whilst attempting to preserve the threading this time )
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 01:35 -0800, John LeMoyne Castle wrote:
OOo Basic has had issues with its fixed point Currency type for a long
time.
I think the Basic Currency type deficiencies create a bar to adoption
in the
minds
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865
Rainer Bielefeld libreoff...@bielefeldundbuss.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|31734 |
--
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 12:12 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
2) Remove the Selection mode thing. Unless people are really using
that.
I use it. Probably not often enough to warrant it being on the status
bar permanently, but it does get used.
Nigel
Hi Sebastian,
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 11:26 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
- What annoys me most is the document modified indicator. If it is
unmodified, I see some *empty* separators in the status bar (why do we
show empty separators? these should GO GO GO away) and the mouse
tooltip
Hi everyone,
After few sleepless nights spent grokking and with quite a big deal
help from IRC and the list, have come up with the first cuts working
version of the External Edit functionality[1]. Have attached the
patches rebased against the latest master.
Would love to hear
Miklos Vajna wrote:
Does the idea sounds sane, OK to push?
Totally! Would you maybe also be interested to work on an improved
start page / index, e.g. like this here:
http://www.informatik.uni-hamburg.de/~meine/hg/vigra/file/bf402d01f821/docsrc/index.dxx
(see
Hi Sebastian,
Sebastian Spaeth schrieb:
Am I the only one finding the current status bar pretty much useless?
Yes ;)
To learn more about the status bar have a look at
http://www.ooowiki.de/StatusLeiste. It is in German and needs an update,
but the text shows, that the status bar is a great
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 16:11 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Kohei Yoshida wrote:
b) We warn when closing a modified doc anyway, so there is no need to
always warn me and use up precious space. I propose to just do away
with it.
Sorry I have to disagree there. I'm the one
At 9:54am -0500 Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
Sorry I have to disagree there. I'm the one who put that icon there,
and the reason for that was to have a visually obvious way to tell
whether or not the document is currently modified. A lot of people
were using the save icon status for
Can someone running LibO on Fedora try and reproduce this bug:
document hyperlink with utf-8 characters fails export to PDF
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115788
So far no one else can reproduce it.
Hardly a showstopper, but it would be an embarrassing regression if it
Hi Thorsten,
Thorsten Behrens schrieb:
Kohei Yoshida wrote:
b) We warn when closing a modified doc anyway, so there is no need to
always warn me and use up precious space. I propose to just do away
with it.
Sorry I have to disagree there. I'm the one who put that icon there,
I retained some hunks that IMHO have documentary value.
D.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 04:46:47PM +0100, David Tardon wrote:
I retained some hunks that IMHO have documentary value.
... and pushed the rest, too .-)
D.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 10:34 -0500, Kevin Hunter wrote:
At 9:54am -0500 Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
Sorry I have to disagree there. I'm the one who put that icon there,
and the reason for that was to have a visually obvious way to tell
whether or not the document is currently
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865
Kohei Yoshida kyosh...@novell.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|31805 |
--- Comment #17
Hi John,
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 01:35 -0800, John LeMoyne Castle wrote:
Nothing says 'run away' like mangling the money numbers.
:-)
The attached CurTestODS.ods spreadsheet Basic program CurTestRunAll
demonstrates the errors from the old implementation:
-- flagrantly wrong
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 16:42 +0100, Regina Henschel wrote:
Hi Thorsten,
Thorsten Behrens schrieb:
Kohei Yoshida wrote:
b) We warn when closing a modified doc anyway, so there is no need to
always warn me and use up precious space. I propose to just do away
with it.
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 10:24 -0500, Kevin Hunter wrote:
Hullo List,
Per Yi Fan Jiang's message 3 days ago, I'm nominating this bug for a
blocker for RC2
I took a little look at that. What *I* see is that its broken on master,
but looks ok on libreoffice-3.3. What versions did you compare
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865
Bug 31865 depends on bug 31938, which changed state.
Bug 31938 Summary: Win32 installer is not BrOffice branded
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31938
What|Old Value |New Value
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 16:58 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 10:24 -0500, Kevin Hunter wrote:
Hullo List,
Per Yi Fan Jiang's message 3 days ago, I'm nominating this bug for a
blocker for RC2
I took a little look at that. What *I* see is that its broken on master,
On 11/29/2010 07:48 PM, Mattias Johnsson wrote:
On 30 November 2010 11:34, Joe Smithj...@martnet.com wrote:
I was also having a lot of trouble learning anything from running OOo under
gdb. Gdb was acting weird and I couldn't step through the code and poke
around. I ended up trying to do it by
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 12:30 -0500, Joe Smith wrote:
On 11/30/2010 09:54 AM, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
Sorry I have to disagree there. I'm the one who put that icon there,
and the reason for that was to have a visually obvious way to tell
whether or not the document is currently modified. A
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 04:21:08PM +0100, Thorsten Behrens
t...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Miklos Vajna wrote:
Does the idea sounds sane, OK to push?
Totally!
OK, pushed.
Would you maybe also be interested to work on an improved
start page / index, e.g. like this here:
Hi Kohei,
Kohei Yoshida wrote (30-11-10 17:25)
[...]
Removing that would
not radically improve the real estate of the status bar.
Indeed.
Plus that I guess there are quite some interesting Calc/Excel issues
out there, waiting for 'some love', as Thorsten always can say so kindly.
As
Hi Joe,
Joe Smith wrote (30-11-10 18:30)
I think Sebastian has raised a number of good points. Forcing users to
deal with stuff that only experts care about is a huge problem with OOo;
I sincerely hope LibO can do better.
Information given by the status bar, plus the control options it gives,
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865
Kohei Yoshida kyosh...@novell.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||31805
--
Configure
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 19:44 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
Hi Kohei,
Kohei Yoshida wrote (30-11-10 17:25)
[...]
Removing that would
not radically improve the real estate of the status bar.
Indeed.
Plus that I guess there are quite some interesting Calc/Excel issues
out there,
Yeni Sayfa 1
ANA SAYFA
İNDİRİMLİ ÜRÜNLER
Yeni Eklenen Ürünler
Alışveriş Sepetim
İletişim Bilgilerimiz
regards
From f5aac0dd10c586fbcdcd8e6a86e396601db8ad27 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Pierre-Andr=C3=A9=20Jacquod?= pjacq...@alumni.ethz.ch
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 08:20:37 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] trivial warning cleaning in binfilter - unocore (1)
---
Le 29/11/2010 14:38, Julien Nabet a écrit :
Hello,
I reproduced the segmentation fault with the same file
(blibs-gui/vcl/source/helper/canvasbitmap.cxx) by activating
enable=all for cppcheck.
I made a tracker on cppcheck (#2252
http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/cppcheck/ticket/2252).
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 10:36 -0500, Joe Smith wrote:
Can someone running LibO on Fedora try and reproduce this bug:
document hyperlink with utf-8 characters fails export to PDF
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115788
So far no one else can reproduce it.
I can. Its a problem
Lubos Lunak wrote:
On Tuesday 30 of November 2010, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Additionally, I think most classes don't necessarily need detailed
docs for all methods in the first place (which may also hurt later
merging from OOo), but would already benefit from a two-line
mission statement
Hi Thorsten, hi Sebastian, all! :-)
Am Dienstag, den 30.11.2010, 12:00 +0100 schrieb Thorsten Behrens:
Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
Am I the only one finding the current status bar pretty much useless?
Nope. I hear you, pretty much unconditionally. Adding UX tag
Cc-ing my favourite UX homie.
Hi Christoph, all,
Christoph Noack wrote (30-11-10 22:31)
Some more issues of the current design:
[...]
Agreed?
I do not object improving the Status Bar. Although I tend to find other
subjects more important. But that is just me of course, who fights more
with compatibility issues then
in the next few minutes
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Important: for your next pull do ./bin/g pull -r BEFORE git pull -r
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi,
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:02:05 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com
wrote:
Important: for your next pull do ./bin/g pull -r BEFORE git pull -r
Could you apply the attached patch for /bin/sh?
Cheers,
-- Takeshi Abe
From 5940e81d9c9fd7b48b292a66781f3f9ee214ce9b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Pushed, thanks
Norbert
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Takeshi Abe t...@fixedpoint.jp wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:02:05 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com
wrote:
Important: for your next pull do ./bin/g pull -r BEFORE git pull -r
Could you apply the attached patch for
Another performance improvement for the perl installer. This one
brought my ./bin/ooinstall -l dirname time down from about 4 1/2
minutes to under 4 minutes. (Warning: that number is in the right
ballpark, but is from a very small number of install runs.) The only
functional change was to
Part 2 on the Changed icon part.
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 22:31:44 +0100, Christoph Noack wrote:
DOCUMENT CHANGED INDICATION
A solution should:
* just work
* be unobtrusive (don't catch attention if it isn't required,
don't waste space)
* be self-explanatory (if
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:54:37 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
a) This is the standard state of my documents (see, I tend to modify
docs in a editor, DOH), and that exclamation mark purports some
sense of urgency and failure.
Sorry I have to disagree there.
Thanks for the info
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:50:28 +0100, Cor Nouws oo...@nouenoff.nl wrote:
Information given by the status bar, plus the control options it gives,
often is important for users I advise.
Nobody, lest I, doubts or denies that. But do your users like to
remember on which items they have to single,
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:22:36 +0100, Regina Henschel wrote:
Sebastian Spaeth schrieb:
Am I the only one finding the current status bar pretty much useless?
Yes ;)
OK, let me be more precise has improvement potential in its current form :)
To learn more about the status bar have a look at
49 matches
Mail list logo
