Hi all,
Nino Novak wrote (14-07-11 22:48)
Am Donnerstag, 14. Juli 2011, um 14:29:53 schrieb Florian Effenberger:
The list of fixed bugs in this release is here:
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/src/bugfixes-libreoffice-3-4-release-3.4.2.1.log
for a clickable version, look at
Hi Joe,
On 19 July 2011 06:40, Joseph Powers jpower...@cox.net wrote:
I'd like someone doing a Unix build to review this for me. I compile Mac and
this is Unix only code so I don't just want to push and hope...
First I thought it would compile and want just to write something but
then I tried
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||38095
--
Configure
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 01:14 +0900, Takeshi Abe wrote:
Hi all,
According to a discussion on the Japanese local mailing list,
the following issue may prevent some users from migrating
to 3.4.x series:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38095
Looking for ack-s for 3-4 and 3-4-2.
Hi Mike,
On 19 July 2011 01:07, Mike Eberdt libr...@comcast.net wrote:
My 'dmake' fu is basically non-existent, so I haven't poked at this
seriously yet. And as I understand it, a transition is underway to GNU
make, so I guess I've been a bit reluctant to put a lot of time into
learning the
I cherry-picked to the 3-4 branch, 2 more reviews needed for the current
3.4.2 I guess.
F.
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 09:50 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 01:14 +0900, Takeshi Abe wrote:
Hi all,
According to a discussion on the Japanese local mailing list,
the
2 more reviews needed for the current 3.4.2
+1
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi Kohei,
Thanks for review!
First, for your svl patch:
1) in SfxIntegerListItem::GetList(), you do
+rList.insert( aIt, m_aList[n] );
but you can simply call push_back here to append new data to the end of
the vector. Also, let's use pre-increment on iterators in the for
loop
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 04:20 +0700, Nguyen Vu Hung (KiEi) wrote:
Hello all,
How can I build *rpm installation set under CentOS 5.6?
I know that
./autogen.sh --with-distro=LibreOfficeLinux --with-lang=vi
--with-max-jobs=20 --with-num-cpus=5 --with-package-format=rpm deb
--without-junit
Hi all,
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 10:54:32 +0200
Matúš Kukan matus.ku...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Mike,
On 19 July 2011 01:07, Mike Eberdt
libr...@comcast.net wrote:
My 'dmake' fu is basically non-existent, so I haven't poked at this
seriously yet. And as I understand it, a transition is underway
Hi Kohei,
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 16:57 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
Just to tone down this statistics a bit. The vast majority of changes
are in fact code relocations with no changes e.g. the change in
rectangle_set is purely moving code from one file to another.
:-) Any chance of a
On 07/18/2011 11:07 AM, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
On 07/16/2011 05:02 AM, Ta Duc Tung wrote:
Hi,
1. How to get current page number for printing?
We've found a variable mnCurPage from printdlg.cxx but it
seems not to be the right one. I think it is current page number for
It seems like Bjoern unintentionally wrote this just to me:
Hi all,
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 10:54:32 +0200
Matúš Kukan matus.kukan-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumw...@public.gmane.org wrote:
Hi Mike,
On 19 July 2011 01:07, Mike Eberdt
libreme-wuw85uim5zdr7s880jo...@public.gmane.org wrote:
My 'dmake' fu is
Hi Imacat,
This really belongs on the design list; please reply only to there,
unless you have a patch or are seriously considering doing the work;
as/when you are committed there - then:
libreoffice-ux-adv...@lists.freedesktop.org
is a better forum. My personal take is
Hi Maciej,
On 2011-07-16 at 17:22 +0200, Maciej Rumianowski wrote:
I have changed it and now building again if it works, I will send a
Patch. It will be my first :)
Patch in attachment, ofcourse on LGPL3+/GPL3+/MPL.
Thank you very much for the patch! :-) Joseph has pushed it the other
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 00:23 +0800, imacat wrote:
Dear all,
Hi. This is imacat from Taiwan. I received a mail from some friend
in Canonical, Taiwan. What do you think about this, to change the title
from LibreOffice Calc to LibreOffice Calc Spreadsheet?
I know that this is
On Sun, 2011-07-17 at 15:06 -0700, julien2412 wrote:
Yifan J wrote:
Firstly, I found smoketest fails on the HEAD (with error
officeconnection.cxx:140), then I tried to launch soffice.bin in
solver/350
manually, but soffice.bin crashes immedialy even before splash screen
appears.
On Sun, 2011-07-17 at 22:53 +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote:
And also when converting to new build system I still don't understand
some things. For example with libraries and RepositoryFixes.
And I found commit:
Hi Mike,
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 16:07 -0700, Mike Eberdt wrote:
seriously yet. And as I understand it, a transition is underway to GNU
make, so I guess I've been a bit reluctant to put a lot of time into
learning the old build system.
Yes - there is some horrible sterilisation of
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 00:32 +1000, Troy Rollo wrote:
+/* \'00 is a valid internal character in a
+* string in RTF, however ByteString::Append
+* does nothing if '\0' is passed in. It is
+
On Sun, 2011-07-17 at 00:17 +0200, Andreas Mantke wrote:
Hi all,
I tried to build LibO on Linux-x64 with KDE 4 (openSUSE 11.4-x64) from a
fresh cloned
master and the build failed inside the module vcl. I then did source
./LinuxX86-64Env.Set.sh and walked to vcl and run a make -r. That
Hi,
It would be great if somebody could review+push the attached patch to
3.4 branch(s). This is _not_ a problem in master.
Without this patch shared formula(s) would not be imported correctly in
builds from 3.4 branches.
Thanks to Markus (moggi) for debugging this to quite some level (and
also
Hi there,
On Sun, 2011-07-17 at 18:50 +0200, Maciej Rumianowski wrote:
Hmm, well I've now added a sylk import unit test to sc, i.e.
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/calc/commit/?id=8ac49ef8ab4f065d7b729dcb15505c602c77
Thanks, but as Nigel pointed out it's hard to unit test
Caolán McNamara píše v Út 19. 07. 2011 v 09:50 +0100:
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 01:14 +0900, Takeshi Abe wrote:
Hi all,
According to a discussion on the Japanese local mailing list,
the following issue may prevent some users from migrating
to 3.4.x series:
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 03:06 -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
2 more reviews needed for the current 3.4.2
+1
And pushed to libreoffice-3-4-2; thanks - and lovely to see the unit
test there to prevent regression :-)
ATB,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@novell.com ,
Looks good to me. Will push it to 3.4.
2011/7/19 Muthu Subramanian K sumu...@novell.com
Hi,
It would be great if somebody could review+push the attached patch to
3.4 branch(s). This is _not_ a problem in master.
Without this patch shared formula(s) would not be imported correctly in
builds
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 12:49 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
Looks fine except for a typo in scriptListCount definition. I have fixed
it by
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-gui/commit/?id=bfa455e31ab2356b4ee0cf499bb71138e837e6c7
Could you please approve this typo fix?
Oops, yes. That
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 16:57 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
Just to tone down this statistics a bit. The vast majority of changes
are in fact code relocations with no changes
So - I've pushed it to -3-4-2 - after doing my best at reviewing the
changes; but I'm really unhappy with this.
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 11:18 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
Yes, it will be in 3.4.2. I am going to make sure that all patches are
in, do test build, tag, and branch.
So this got into 3.4.2 - for the record.
Thanks,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@novell.com , Pseudo
Hello,
I fear I'm a bit late for this patch to be included into 3.4.2 but at least
we should push it to 3.4
It fixes that we can't use database ranges in formulas because ScNameToken
always used ocName but it could also be ocDBArea for database ranges. It's
nothing special, just added an
Looks good to me. Will push it to 3.4.
2011/7/19 Muthu Subramanian K sumu...@novell.com
Hi,
It would be great if somebody could review+push the attached patch to
3.4 branch(s). This is _not_ a problem in master.
Without this patch shared formula(s) would not be imported correctly
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Bug 35673 depends on bug 38095, which changed state.
Bug 38095 Summary: Character classification for Western or Asian text font
differ since conventional version.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38095
What|Old
Hello,
could I get reviews for the attached patch for 3-4 and 3-4-2 too, if
possible? It is actually just removing checking for header in the
bWrapAllowed expression. This is fdo#39155 and I do not see a reason for the
check there anyway, the change applied only makes text in a header wrap
Hi,
On 2011-07-19 at 12:05 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
Looks fine except for a typo in scriptListCount definition. I have fixed
it by
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-gui/commit/?id=bfa455e31ab2356b4ee0cf499bb71138e837e6c7
Could you please approve this typo fix?
Oops,
On Tuesday 19 July 2011, Caolán McNamara wrote:
Well, this'll work I guess, and I'm minded to push it, but why ;-) Is
there a concrete bug this fixes ?
Yes, but it is a little obscure. If you take the attached ODT file, save it as
an RTF, and then load the RTF, the prefix to the paragraph
On Tuesday 19 July 2011, Korrawit Pruegsanusak wrote:
Hello Troy,
Digging mailing-list archive and just glancing at your patch,
isn't this patch against fdo#33960 ?
(https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33960)
IMHO it isn't likely to be 33898.
It should have said 33893 (although I
On Jul 19, 2011, at 12:51 AM, Matúš Kukan wrote:
Hi Joe,
On 19 July 2011 06:40, Joseph Powers jpower...@cox.net wrote:
I'd like someone doing a Unix build to review this for me. I compile Mac and
this is Unix only code so I don't just want to push and hope...
First I thought it would
Hi Michael,
Hey ! - so unit tests are -never- useless, particularly if they are
fast, small and run during the build. Indeed - I would -love- to have
much more unit test coverage of calc.
I also like the Idea of unit tests and an Easy Hack with calc unit tests
is on my radar :)
Hello David,
I think the original version should be safe. Our formula api can't deal with
broken documents during import especially the oox import can't deal with
errors of any kinds in formulas. But a broken document won't create a crash
only a #Name entry in the cell that is not correct.
I
Andreas Radke píše v Po 18. 07. 2011 v 18:18 +0200:
Am Mon, 18 Jul 2011 16:58:03 +0200
schrieb Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz:
Hi,
the below patches should fix two more problems reported by Andy. I
would like to get them into libreoffice-3-4-2 branch.
Best Regards,
Petr
Hi guys,
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 16:58 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
the below patches should fix two more problems reported by Andy. I would
like to get them into libreoffice-3-4-2 branch.
I've pushed them to libreoffice-3-4; and I attach them here, two more
ack's needed, I understand
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 02:35:42PM +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
Hello David,
I think the original version should be safe. Our formula api can't deal with
broken documents during import especially the oox import can't deal with
errors of any kinds in formulas. But a broken document won't
Looks perfectly OK.
+1 from me
F.
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 13:55 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi guys,
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 16:58 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
the below patches should fix two more problems reported by Andy. I would
like to get them into libreoffice-3-4-2 branch.
Fridrich Strba píše v Út 19. 07. 2011 v 15:08 +0200:
Looks perfectly OK.
+1 from me
Andy told me on irc that it worked for hit. I took it as 3rd approval
and pushed into 3-4-2 branch.
Best Regards,
Petr
___
LibreOffice mailing list
David Tardon píše v Út 19. 07. 2011 v 15:02 +0200:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 02:35:42PM +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
Okay.
I have pushed the fix to 3.4.1 as is (but the addendum is still in 3.4,
should we want it).
I see it in 3-4-2 branch = updated subject.
Thanks for help.
Best Regards,
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Jan Holesovsky ke...@suse.cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|39155 |
--- Comment #171 from
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Italo Vignoli italo.vign...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/19/11 2:53 PM, plino wrote:
I understand that it is the version you are supposed to distribute. BUT it
still needs a CHECK because there are NEWER security fixes.
Although I don't use Windows, I've seen a
Hi Lubos, all,
On 2011-07-19 at 13:49 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
could I get reviews for the attached patch for 3-4 and 3-4-2 too, if
possible? It is actually just removing checking for header in the
bWrapAllowed expression. This is fdo#39155 and I do not see a reason for the
check there
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 22:18 +1000, Troy Rollo wrote:
On Tuesday 19 July 2011, Caolán McNamara wrote:
Well, this'll work I guess, and I'm minded to push it, but why ;-) Is
there a concrete bug this fixes ?
Yes, but it is a little obscure. If you take the attached ODT file, save it
as
an
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 07:24 +0200, David Tardon wrote:
(I haven't pushed Laurent's patch.)
Thanks, David. I've just pushed Laurent's patch with my sign-off.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc
kyosh...@novell.com
___
LibreOffice
On 19 July 2011 14:22, Joseph Powers jpower...@cox.net wrote:
A List would be better; however, it's a list of pointers so the size isn't
that big.
So why not use it ?
I did not mean the actual size in memory but the number of elements.
I've seen there around 150 elements when I tried to
Hi Markus,
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 13:19 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
It fixes that we can't use database ranges in formulas because
ScNameToken always used ocName but it could also be ocDBArea for
database ranges. It's nothing special, just added an optional
parameter to the constructor of
Cor Nouws píše v Út 19. 07. 2011 v 09:12 +0200:
Hi all,
Nino Novak wrote (14-07-11 22:48)
Am Donnerstag, 14. Juli 2011, um 14:29:53 schrieb Florian Effenberger:
The list of fixed bugs in this release is here:
Andreas Radke píše v Út 19. 07. 2011 v 00:09 +0200:
Nice, you've almost fixed all of them expect some *rc files:
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 126 Jul 18 22:01
/build/pkg/libreoffice-common/usr/lib/libreoffice/ure/bin/versionrc
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 1.1K Jul 18 22:01
Hello,
sorry to bother you, but I'm getting continous requests from our
co-sponsor to give them some details on the hackfest agenda. :-)
The proposed items list at
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Hackfest2011#Ideas is rather empty
for now. Anyone would like to add their ideas and plans
Hi guys,
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 10:13 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
Having said that - I'm not a pure PITA if there is an accurate and
complete patch of what actually changed here to review - then we can
review it - but I'm not a fan of approving big, confused, un-quantified
changes at
Florian Effenberger schrieb:
Hello,
sorry to bother you, but I'm getting continous requests from our
co-sponsor to give them some details on the hackfest agenda. :-)
The proposed items list at
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Hackfest2011#Ideas is rather empty
for now. Anyone would like to
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Bug 35673 depends on bug 37763, which changed state.
Bug 37763 Summary: Define a range name prevents recognition of a label
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37763
What|Old Value |New Value
Hi there,
I'd like to have the following commit
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/calc/commit/?id=8da78944e7c4fcae9ae40bea7162898d20db6329
cherry-picked to -3-4 and -3-4-2 in order to fix
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39236
which is a nasty crasher which took me almost a
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
mariosv mari...@miguelangel.mobi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||36555
--
Configure
Hello,
(2011/07/19 16:12), Caolán McNamara wrote:
If you use --enable-epm (you can drop the explicit
--with-package-format=rpm deb), then when you do a make there should
them be rpms created under
instsetoo_native/unxlng*/some/sub/dir/use/find/to/find/them
FWIW,
On Jul 19, 2011, at 7:34 AM, Matúš Kukan wrote:
On 19 July 2011 14:22, Joseph Powers jpower...@cox.net wrote:
A List would be better; however, it's a list of pointers so the size
isn't that big.
So why not use it ?
I did not mean the actual size in memory but the number of elements.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 02:56:04PM -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
Hi there,
I'd like to have the following commit
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/calc/commit/?id=8da78944e7c4fcae9ae40bea7162898d20db6329
cherry-picked to -3-4 and -3-4-2 in order to fix
Uses xinerama to get the size of the primary screen
0001-Splash-screen-fix-for-multi-head-on-Linux-bug-33214.patch
Description: Binary data
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
64 matches
Mail list logo
