On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 19:29 +0200, Xisco Faulí wrote:
Thank you for pointing out this file but I don't really understand how
it works.
The wizard is called here :
http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/officecfg/registry/data/org/openoffice/Office/UI/WriterCommands.xcu#441
where
Hi Lionel
On 16/08/11 17:32, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
Two questions,
a) did you try this on master
No, not yet.
no problem
( I did and it appeared to work as expected ) but I am pretty 'base'
disabled so I fear I may have missed something in trying to recreate
it
You have to be very
Hi all,
there have been created the libreoffice-3-4-3 branch. It will be used for fine
tuning of the 3.4.3 bugfix release. It is based on the tag
libreoffice-3.4.3.1 for 3.4.3-rc1 release.
The following rules apply:
+ preferably just translation or blocker fixes
+ only
On Aug 16, 2011, at 8:13 PM, Matúš Kukan wrote:
- There are more objects with the same name in different modules.
So, is it possible to create one object file for each module and
make these variables, classes.. invisible outside object file and then
create big library from them?
I would
Petr Mladek wrote:
I guess that you need it with the md5sum prefix, so I uploaded it as
http://download.go-oo.org/src/3c6b8de6b75eee445b29f1de5fe01f02-graphite2-1.0.1.tgz
Seeing this - we've recently moved to http://dev-www.libreoffice.org/src
for external source tarballs. Didn't find
Should be applied to master
and 3-4-3 branch for which we need two more sign offs.
So please review/ack :)
From 989934ab08a5ef9e6e95c87ea78db495f2abcee4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1=20Chv=C3=A1tal?= tchva...@suse.cz
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 11:33:55 +0200
Subject:
On Aug 11, 2011, at 12:22 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
On Wednesday 10 of August 2011, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On Aug 10, 2011, at 12:31 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
On Tuesday 09 of August 2011, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Technically, lostd::list is no longer a container, as it violates the
requirement
Fridrich Strba schrieb:
no changes have been committed into the libreoffice-3-3-4 branch.
Hi,
no Bug reports at all, so I will modify Version 3.3.4-RC to 3.3.4
Release in few minutes.
CU
Rainer
___
LibreOffice mailing list
Hello,
I was wondering why the git tags are named `3.3.4.2` for 3.3.4-rc2
instead of the more natural `3.3.4-rc2` or the more common `v3.3.4-rc2`.
I am used to see 3.3.4.2 as the second bugfix release for 3.3.4, or, in
more mathematical terms, 3.3.4.2 3.3.4 = 3.3.4.0. I hope 3.5-rc1 will
jeffrey chang wrote:
Sorry for the delay. Here is the revised patch that fixes the dimension
problem without all the rough scratch work/comments from last time.
Hi Jeffrey,
ah sorry, mixed up the two bugs - thanks Yifan for noting -
templates indeed look much better with your fix, thanks a
On 16/08/11 17:32, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
I disabled the export out any embedded image object code by adding a
return; before it, and it does not loose the embedded images, even
after restarting LO and re-opening the document.
( after refamiliarising myself with this code ) this behaviour is
Hi guys,
I just created a repo for Cedric's gitdm work:
git clone git://anongit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/contrib/gitdm-config
Containing the config files we use to generate our affiliation and
progress graphs / stats like these:
Hi Caolan,
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 14:26 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 05:48 -0700, cbosdonnat wrote:
All is now working fine, and that later commit could be applied to 3.4
safely.
Sorry, not trying to be a pain or anything, but that assignment operator
now leaks the
Hi Markus,
On Wednesday, 2011-08-17 07:23:42 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
That was my intention. My idea was that we should create a global range name
as default and not a local range name that points to the same cell. But
after a talk to Kohei and your impression it seems that this is
Hi,
On Monday, 2011-08-15 09:47:02 +0200, Cor Nouws wrote:
In OpenOffice.org legacy, Ctrl-D shows the Selection list.
In LibreOffice that is turned off by default, but can be influenced
by Tools OPtions LibreOffice Calc Compatibility
It's noteworthy that Ctrl+D is (was?) the only method
On 15/08/11 13:10, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
I've committed the patch to the 3.4 branch ( and master ), I've changed
the subject to cherry-pick to 3.4.2 as this issue causes data loss and
as such I think should go into the branch.
2 more acks needed
Noel
Hi guys,
current layout of the download stuff is quite confusing regarding to
old/etc. As I am working on downstream stuff I am pretty sure that the
only thing we mostly favor is that the things are not moved regarding to
theirs age. Also quite great is if we don't have to investigate some
eek I meant to put REVIEW in the subject
On 17/08/11 14:12, Noel Power wrote:
On 15/08/11 13:10, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
I've committed the patch to the 3.4 branch ( and master ), I've
changed the subject to cherry-pick to 3.4.2 as this issue causes data
loss and as such I think should go
On Thursday 11 of August 2011, Miklos Vajna wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:28:42PM +0200, Eike Rathke o...@erack.de wrote:
For which I always recommend xmlpp,
http://software.decisionsoft.com/tools.html
Is this better in some aspect than xmllint --format, which cames with
libxml and
Hi Lucas,
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 21:13 +0200, Lucas Baudin wrote:
Here is a patch to render gtk3 button correctly. I send it now because I
won't have internet until tuesday, and it would be a bit stupid if
anyone made the same thing... So, you are aware that the patch exists,
if you need it :)
At 3:59am -0400 Tue, 16 Aug 2011, Cor Nouws wrote:
Kevin Hunter wrote (16-08-11 01:07)
Do we have, or is there a canonical reference for the UNO API?
Specifically with Python bindings? The various references I've been
able to find online seem haphazard at best. Is that what we have to
work
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 10:18 -0400, Kevin Hunter wrote:
At 3:59am -0400 Tue, 16 Aug 2011, Cor Nouws wrote:
Kevin Hunter wrote (16-08-11 01:07)
Do we have, or is there a canonical reference for the UNO API?
Specifically with Python bindings? The various references I've been
able to find
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Lionel Elie Mamane lio...@mamane.lu wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 04:36:03PM +, nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
One of you broke the build of LibreOffice with your commit :-(
Please commit and push a fix ASAP!
That's plainly wrong. The build log for the
Hi,
I don't see any way in bugzilla to say things like:
bug present / not present in master / libreoffice-3.4, ...
bug fixed / not fixed in master / libreoffice-3.4, ...
There is only *one* version field, and *one* status field, not one per
branch.
So I don't know when to close a bug. When it
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 19:38 +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote:
[snip]
So, can I just rename ItemHolder2 in svtools to ItemHolder3 ?
I have a vague memory from the times of OpenOffice.org of a
numeric suffix on a name indicating the number of template
parameters. Templates with Helper in the name,
Shouldn't it be backported in this case? ...
2011/8/17 Lionel Elie Mamane lio...@mamane.lu
Hi,
I don't see any way in bugzilla to say things like:
bug present / not present in master / libreoffice-3.4, ...
bug fixed / not fixed in master / libreoffice-3.4, ...
There is only *one*
Hi Matúš,
On Monday, 2011-08-15 13:50:44 +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote:
I'm trying to build bigger libraries
What would be the benefit of that in this specific case?
but I have small problem with ItemHolder2.
It's implemented in svl/source/config/itemholder2.cxx and also in
Hi Lubos,
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 12:09:19 +0200
Lubos Lunak l.lu...@suse.cz wrote:
No, starmath doesn't need to call back to writer. The problem is
that this is still needlessly complicated. How about the attached
patch?
While it works, I would prefer if the 10.000-feet-view of the project
Hi Xisco, Hi Norbert, all,
I migrated the feature/gsoc2011_wizards branch from components to
core. While that should have been a simple git format-patch/git
am combo with a bit of manual fudging for the merge commits:
9e91dbca08056fc31f388f5642fdfa3d2b910990
Hi,
I noticed that Mutex(Guard) C++ helper classes silently ignores
failures to create / acquire / release / destroy a mutex, which seems
rather worrying: if one puts a mutex acquire, it means the rest of the
code should not execute if the mutex was not acquired, lest subtle
bugs crop up
30 matches
Mail list logo
