Re: [Libreoffice] [GSoC 2011][svgexport][PATCH] Fixed a buf in the JavaScript animation engine

Kohei Yoshida wrote: > > I'm planning to switch to OneGit, anyway I'm not sure where my patches > > have been pushed at present. > > I see several commits under your name in the svg-export branch: > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/log/?h=svg-export > > Perhaps this is where Thorst

[Libreoffice] Build failure on Mac OSX

Hi all, When trying to build from master on Mac OSX, I get this after dmake gets built : ERROR: incomplete dependencies! Fetching dependencies for module translations from solver... failed and the build naturally stops. Which dependencies might they be ? The build.log gives no further inform

Re: [Libreoffice] Platform-specific OUTPATH variables

> Then we should only need two build directories: > - one for the host binaries > - one for the target binaries Bzzt, you are misunderstanding the GNU autofoo cross-compilation terminology;) (A *very* common trap to fall in...) In general, in GNU autofoo cross-compilation terminology, there

Re: [Libreoffice] [GSoC 2011][svgexport][PATCH] Fixed a buf in the JavaScript animation engine

Marco wrote: > >Since all patches from your tarbomb except > >0019-Fixed-a-bug-in-the-JavaScript-animation-engi-filters.patch are > >pushed, > > Do you mean pushed on OneGit master branch ? > Yep :) > Well, I understand this one and your other comments, but I think you should > take into account

Re: [Libreoffice] [GSoC 2011][svgexport][PATCH] Fixed a buf in the JavaScript animation engine

Marco wrote: > When I go to switch to OneGit which patches of mine will I find > already merged ? > Yes, except for the 0019- one. Let's rework that to have svgscript.hxx auto-generated there. Cheers, -- Thorsten pgpfEEYWFV6JL.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [Libreoffice] Platform-specific OUTPATH variables

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 01:29:36AM -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > > Then we should only need two build directories: > > - one for the host binaries > > - one for the target binaries > > Bzzt, you are misunderstanding the GNU autofoo cross-compilation > terminology;) (A *very* common trap to fa

[Libreoffice] instructions for building on windows with OneGit

Hi Are there up-to-date instructions somewhere for building on Windows with the new OneGit repos? I seem to be stuck building on the old repos. Thanks, Noel Grnadin Disclaimer: http://www.peralex.com/disclaimer.html ___ LibreOffice mailing list Libr

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] DrawPolyLine on Windows

Hello! Any code [patches] from me is always under normal license of LibreOffice. 29.08.2011 14:28, Tor Lillqvist пишет: Anyway, I committed and pushed your patch, thanks! Please do follow up with more patches if you notice other problems. Please confirm that you license your code under our no

Re: [Libreoffice] Build failure on Mac OSX

Alexander Thurgood wrote: > ERROR: incomplete dependencies! > > > Fetching dependencies for module translations from solver... failed > Looks like you (re-)configured your build to use a lang other than en-US. Can you manually do a "make fetch" & report back whether that fixed it (beware, transl

Re: [Libreoffice] Build failure on Mac OSX

Le 30/08/11 11:38, Thorsten Behrens a écrit : Hi Thorsten, > Looks like you (re-)configured your build to use a lang other than > en-US. Can you manually do a "make fetch" & report back whether that > fixed it (beware, translations is a rather big repo)? > Well that's strange because I've been

[Libreoffice] gdb debugging error

Hello, While I try to run gdb on soffice.bin I cannot start soffice.bin as it gives the following error: /home/LOff/libo/desktop/source/app/cmdlineargs.cxx, Line 140: CommandLineArgs: no ProcessServiceFactory./lib/bootstrap.uno.so" Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation f

Re: [Libreoffice] gdb debugging error

Hello Jenei, I suppose you runned "make dev-install". If it's the case, have you runned all the commands quoted at the end : cd . ooenv... (I think you perhaps missed this one since I had exactly the same error yesterday and this was the cause) ./soffice.bin Hope it helps. Julien. -- View this

[Libreoffice] [Bug 37361] LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361 Petr Mladek changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||40392 --- Comment #4 from Petr Mladek 201

Re: [Libreoffice] [GSoC 2011][svgexport][PATCH] Fixed a buf in the JavaScript animation engine

On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 09:36:00 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote: Marco wrote: skip Well, I understand this one and your other comments, but I think you should take into account that all the script is embedded into the svg document. If a user incurs into a problem with the animation engine a

Re: [Libreoffice] Platform-specific OUTPATH variables

Hi Tor, On Tuesday, 2011-08-30 00:15:50 -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > > Can't we at least get rid of the '350' subdirectory ? > > Yes please. The 350 should be 340 (isn't it?) for 3-4 branches, so different output hierarchies when switching branches is nice to have in order to not spoil alread

Re: [Libreoffice] Platform-specific OUTPATH variables

Hi, On Tuesday, 2011-08-30 00:15:50 -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > For instance, when cross-compiling to PowerPC Linux from x86_64 Linux > (hypothetical example, but as such potentially useful), idlc would be > in solver/350/unxlngx6.pro/bin, and the PowerPC binaries being > produced in solver/350

Re: [Libreoffice] Platform-specific OUTPATH variables

Sent from my iPhone On 30.08.2011, at 14:40, Eike Rathke wrote: > Hi Tor, > > On Tuesday, 2011-08-30 00:15:50 -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > >>> Can't we at least get rid of the '350' subdirectory ? >> >> Yes please. > > The 350 should be 340 (isn't it?) for 3-4 branches, so different outp

Re: [Libreoffice] [GSoC 2011][svgexport][PATCH] Fixed a buf in the JavaScript animation engine

Marco wrote: > Ok sorry, I have no knowledge of software legal issues. > So should I remove such a change ? > Yes please. > Yep, I was thinking of that by a while, what stopped me from > deploying such a solution is: - it is not clear to me how to get > the python script executed automatically (m

Re: [Libreoffice] Platform-specific OUTPATH variables

Hi Stephan, On Tuesday, 2011-08-30 14:59:23 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > >>> Can't we at least get rid of the '350' subdirectory ? > >> > >> Yes please. > > > > The 350 should be 340 (isn't it?) for 3-4 branches, so different output > > hierarchies when switching branches is nice to have i

Re: [Libreoffice] Platform-specific OUTPATH variables

On Aug 30, 2011, at 3:42 PM, Eike Rathke wrote: > On Tuesday, 2011-08-30 14:59:23 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > Can't we at least get rid of the '350' subdirectory ? Yes please. >>> >>> The 350 should be 340 (isn't it?) for 3-4 branches, so different output >>> hierarchies when

Re: [Libreoffice] Platform-specific OUTPATH variables

Hi Eike, On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 15:42 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote: > True, but instead of getting rid of solver/350 I'd rather introduce > a module/$INPATH/350 ... on the other hand, having two cloned repos > and > build trees for different branches is a better approach. Just was > thinking in terms o

Re: [Libreoffice] Unknown property

Hi julien2412, On Monday, 2011-08-29 15:58:21 -0700, julien2412 wrote: > I thought this patch would be ok : > diff --git a/sd/source/core/stlsheet.cxx b/sd/source/core/stlsheet.cxx > index 1d6fa46..7e0424e 100644 > --- a/sd/source/core/stlsheet.cxx > +++ b/sd/source/core/stlsheet.cxx > @@ -90,6 +

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Escaped non-ASCII characters from source files.

Hi Takashi, On Tuesday, 2011-08-30 00:27:47 +0900, Takashi Nakamoto wrote: > The attached patch solves a compilation error in libxml2 which occurs on > Windows with some Asian locales. I would appreciate if someone pushes this. Makes sense. Please confirm that you contribute this and possibly fu

Re: [Libreoffice] Platform-specific OUTPATH variables

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 03:42:22PM +0200, Eike Rathke wrote: > > On Tuesday, 2011-08-30 14:59:23 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > > > >>> Can't we at least get rid of the '350' subdirectory ? > > >> > > >> Yes please. > > > > > > The 350 should be 340 (isn't it?) for 3-4 branches, so different

Re: [Libreoffice] Platform-specific OUTPATH variables

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Francois Tigeot wrote: > > The build system uses so many flags and tricks it can't run as-is under > the pkgsrc framework, many libraries are not found at link time. > Some platforms don't understand the -rlink-path and related options either. > > Using LD_LIBRARY_

[Libreoffice] vbaevents*.uno.so and libvbaswobj*uno.so location

Hi Rene, Caolan or Noel has recently suggested me to move vbaobj.uno.so into the Calc package because it links against libsc and is needed only by Calc. I have just seen the following note at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=620100: --- cut --- Changes: libreoffice (1:3.3.3-1)

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Use a custom string to make numbering more flexible

Hi Mohammad, On Tuesday, 2011-08-30 02:41:05 +0430, Mohammad Elahi wrote: > This patch is a try to make outline numbering more flexible. I just want to > know the feedback of community. Looks good from a first glance at the code. One question occurred to me: How is this made persistent, i.e. sto

Re: [Libreoffice] vbaevents*.uno.so and libvbaswobj*uno.so location

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 05:07:33PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: > Caolan or Noel has recently suggested me to move vbaobj.uno.so into the > Calc package because it links against libsc and is needed only by Calc. Did that for a long time. Until this: > I have just seen the following note at > http:

Re: [Libreoffice] Platform-specific OUTPATH variables

Hi Kohei, On Tuesday, 2011-08-30 10:20:05 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > You can try git-new-workdir > > http://kohei.us/2010/11/16/working-with-a-branch-using-git-new-workdir/ Way cool, thanks! I'll try that one day. Eike -- PGP/OpenPGP/GnuPG encrypted mail preferred in all private commun

Re: [Libreoffice] vbaevents*.uno.so and libvbaswobj*uno.so location

On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 17:07 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: > Hi Rene, > > Caolan or Noel has recently suggested me to move vbaobj.uno.so into the > Calc package because it links against libsc and is needed only by Calc. Wasn't me, but in Fedora we put vbaobj.uno.so into calc, vbaevents.uno.so into cor

Re: [Libreoffice] Platform-specific OUTPATH variables

Hi, On Tuesday, 2011-08-30 16:39:01 +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote: > > So, I'm fine with removing 350. > > I'll push the commit then :-) As it may help others as well: I just did cd solver ; ln -s 350/$INPATH . because I probably will forget to mv solver/350/$INPATH solver/ after the next gi

Re: [Libreoffice] Platform-specific OUTPATH variables

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:06:57AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Francois Tigeot wrote: > > > > The build system uses so many flags and tricks it can't run as-is under > > the pkgsrc framework, many libraries are not found at link time. > > Some platforms don't

Re: [Libreoffice] Platform-specific OUTPATH variables

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 05:42:42PM +0200, Eike Rathke wrote: > > Which reminds me there may be other places that rely on the $UPD path > particle. > > Francois, did you adapt solenv/bin/linkoo as well? Good catch, I didn't. What does this file do ? I did a complete build before commiting the pa

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Use a custom string to make numbering more flexible

Hi Eike > Looks good from a first glance at the code. One question occurred to me: > How is this made persistent, i.e. stored in a document? > It is not persistent yet. I think docx has the property appropriate to use for making it persistent, but I know no such a property in odt, it needs addi

Re: [Libreoffice] Platform-specific OUTPATH variables

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Francois Tigeot wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:06:57AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Francois Tigeot >> wrote: >> > >> > The build system uses so many flags and tricks it can't run as-is under >> > the pkgsrc framework,

[Libreoffice] BUG 36594

Hello Eike, I made your recommended changes, but the querycomposer class seems to be modified since I last worked on this issu, as unfortunatelly it deletes all the linefeeds in the query string, so I cannot make it work. Now I could store in a second vector whether one line is just empty(it o

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] DrawPolyLine on Windows

> Any code [patches] from me is always under normal license of LibreOffice. Unfortunately that is not quite clear enough; you need to say exactly what license(s) you mean. --tml ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://li

Re: [Libreoffice] Platform-specific OUTPATH variables

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:21:18AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Francois Tigeot > wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:06:57AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Francois Tigeot > >> wrote: > > I don't know what you packa

Re: [Libreoffice] ccache support

Hi all, On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:27:05AM +0200, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > On 2011-08-08 at 11:33 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote: > > > > I've pushed > > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=57cf026739a3d707378 > > >ca38f59518b018fccca8f > > > > > > This try to automatically use cca

Re: [Libreoffice] Platform-specific OUTPATH variables

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Francois Tigeot wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:21:18AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Francois Tigeot >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:06:57AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> >> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 1:35 AM

Re: [Libreoffice] ccache support

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Francois Tigeot > wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:27:05AM +0200, Jan Holesovsky wrote: >>> On 2011-08-08 at 11:33 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote: >>> >>> > > I've pushed >>> > > http://cgit

Re: [Libreoffice] Platform-specific OUTPATH variables

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:58:08AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Francois Tigeot > wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:21:18AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Francois Tigeot > >> wrote: > >> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at

Re: [Libreoffice] Platform-specific OUTPATH variables

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Francois Tigeot wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:58:08AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Francois Tigeot >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:21:18AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> >> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:43 A

Re: [Libreoffice] ccache support

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:00:54PM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Francois Tigeot > > wrote: > >> > >> I'm not happy about this commit either: when packaging LibreOffice under > >> pkgsrc, > >> it doubles the size of the build tree for no gain in speed. > >

Re: [Libreoffice] Platform-specific OUTPATH variables

Hi Francois, On Tuesday, 2011-08-30 17:49:06 +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote: > > Francois, did you adapt solenv/bin/linkoo as well? > > Good catch, I didn't. > > What does this file do ? I did a complete build before commiting the patch > and there was no obvious problem. When doing make dev-i

Re: [Libreoffice] ccache support

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Francois Tigeot wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:00:54PM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Francois Tigeot >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> I'm not happy about this commit either: when packaging LibreOffice under >> >> pkgsrc, >> >

Re: [Libreoffice] Platform-specific OUTPATH variables

Hi Eike, On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 07:42:54PM +0200, Eike Rathke wrote: > On Tuesday, 2011-08-30 17:49:06 +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote: > > > > Francois, did you adapt solenv/bin/linkoo as well? > > Good catch, I didn't. > > > > What does this file do ? I did a complete build before commiting the

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] DrawPolyLine on Windows

Licensing is very difficult question for me. I contribute some code [patch] without any limitations. So, if it is easier to integrate patch under LGPLv3/MPL licenses then I say «LGPLv3/MPL». 30.08.2011 20:37, Tor Lillqvist пишет: Any code [patches] from me is always under normal license of Lib

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Use a custom string to make numbering more flexible

Hi Mohammad, On Tuesday, 2011-08-30 20:24:18 +0430, Mohammad Elahi wrote: > > How is this made persistent, i.e. stored in a document? > > It is not persistent yet. > I think docx has the property appropriate to use for making it persistent, > but I know no such a property > in odt, it needs addi

Re: [Libreoffice] ccache support

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:56:50PM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Francois Tigeot > wrote: > > > > Still, this ccache stuff is too clever for its own good IMHO. > > for reference here is the motivations that lead me to do it [Snip all sorts of good reasons]

Re: [Libreoffice] BUG 36594

Hi Jenei, On Tuesday, 2011-08-30 18:33:55 +0200, Jenei Gábor wrote: > I made your recommended changes, but the querycomposer class seems > to be modified since I last worked on this issu, as unfortunatelly > it deletes all the linefeeds in the query string, so I cannot make > it work. Are you su

[Libreoffice] Build break when generating RDBs

[ build ALL ] top level modules: i18npool [ build ALL ] loaded modules: i18npool [ build RDB ] i18npool_test_breakiterator awk: cmd. line:1: $R/^<\?xml version.*$R/ { next; } { gsub($R/vnd.sun.star.expand:\$OOO_BASE_DIR\$R/program$R/, "vnd.sun.star.expand:$OOO_BASE_DIR",$0); gsub($R/vnd.sun.star

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Use a custom string to make numbering more flexible

Hi Kohei I was trying to make outline numbering in libreoffice more flexible by using a string to format numbers based on it. To use some escaped strings to represend number from different levels. maybe something like %0 for level 1 number and so on; But ODT standard lacks support for such a field

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW] Fixing layout breakage in pivot table dialog

Hi there, I'd like to have http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=8bf60230255e0e8da66cafff578f148858cee4ca cherry-picked to the 3.4 branch. A patch for this commit is attached as well for convenience. This fixes a slight layout problem in the main pivot table dialog, where th

[Libreoffice] Need help to generate patch with git

Hi all, I'm still learning to use git and need some help. I have made a patch for issue 34431. But after I used the 'commit' command I noticed, that I had to change a file, which needs another 'commit'. Now the command 'format-patch' has produced two files, one for each commit. Is there a way

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Bug 34431 - More symbols (crosses, circles) needed for data points in charts

Hi, I have attached a patch to issue https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34431, so that you can have a look at it and comment. I cannot test import/export with xlsx format because of crash in LO3.5"daily". https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40466. So perhaps pushing shoul

[Libreoffice] Hackers/Users-meeting 10 September, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

Hi All, On the 10th of September we are organising a Hackers/Users-meeting for LibreOffice and OpenOffice.org. The meeting is at MADlab in Eindhoven, The Netherlands. The meeting will begin at 10 o'clock. For more information see http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/NL/bijeenkomst_11-09-10 or

Re: [Libreoffice] Update of AutoText "numbered formula"

Thank you for your answer. Caolán McNamara wrote: > > attaching the replacements (or git binary patch I suppose) to a bug > against libreoffice at https://bugs.freedesktop.org/ would work in the > interim. > I opened bug 40499 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40499 and added each s

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Bug 34431 - More symbols (crosses, circles) needed for data points in charts

Hi Regina, I had the same problem with a patch recently. Did you find a solution? Josh On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 7:01 AM, Regina Henschel wrote: > Hi, > > I have attached a patch to issue > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34431, so that you can have a > look at it and comment. > >

Re: [Libreoffice] Need help to generate patch with git

Hi Regina, > I'm still learning to use git and need some help. I have made a patch for > issue 34431. But after I used the 'commit' command I noticed, that I had to > change a file, which needs another 'commit'. Now the command 'format-patch' > has produced two files, one for each commit. Is there

Re: [Libreoffice] Need help to generate patch with git

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:29:09PM +0200, Regina Henschel wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm still learning to use git and need some help. I have made a > patch for issue 34431. But after I used the 'commit' command I > noticed, that I had to change a file, which needs another 'commit'. > Now the command 'f

[Libreoffice] Base form

Just a line to let someone know that in version 3.4 rc2 that when I create a form and select a color, it comes back as white. Not a major problem, and it could be me, as i do not use a base program often. Another suggestion would be to allow a field to be inserted in the middle of a base fil

Re: [Libreoffice] Need help to generate patch with git

Hi Regina, On Tuesday, 2011-08-30 23:29:09 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote: > I'm still learning to use git and need some help. I have made a > patch for issue 34431. But after I used the 'commit' command I > noticed, that I had to change a file, which needs another 'commit'. > Now the command 'form

Re: [Libreoffice] Need help to generate patch with git

Hi Khaled, On Wednesday, 2011-08-31 02:05:10 +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote: > > Now the command 'format-patch' has produced two files, one for each > > commit. Is there a way, to get _one_ patch file? > > For the second commit use `git commit --ammend`. That works only on tip though to replace the

Re: [Libreoffice] Need help to generate patch with git

Hi Regina, On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 23:29 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm still learning to use git and need some help. I have made a patch > for issue 34431. But after I used the 'commit' command I noticed, that I > had to change a file, which needs another 'commit'. Now the comma

Re: [Libreoffice] Need help to generate patch with git

On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 03:11:58AM +0200, Eike Rathke wrote: > Hi Khaled, > > On Wednesday, 2011-08-31 02:05:10 +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote: > > > > Now the command 'format-patch' has produced two files, one for each > > > commit. Is there a way, to get _one_ patch file? > > > > For the second com

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] (was: Re: buglet in 1ec7b6a4 (?))

Hi Stephan, On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 12:08 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > > does not fix this for the one-argument case, however, due to an error > introduced in >

[Libreoffice] Fix pushed to the 3-4 branch

JYI, I cherry-picked this commit by Eike http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=61674465b74f60d7ddb2d7a0fa0e17c9990f6301 to the 3-4 branch with my sign-off. Kohei -- Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc ___ LibreOffice mailing l

Re: [Libreoffice] http://libreoffice.boldandbusted.com/ cppcheck report jobs stalled... no longer! :)

On 08/29/11 19:37, Jesse Adelman wrote: > Hi Julien, > > Replies in-line below. > > On 08/29/11 03:19, julien2412 wrote: >> Hello Jesse, >> >> Just to be sure, is the cppcheck scan on the Master or on another branch ? >> > > jesse@dell-gx620 ~/source/LibreOffice/core $ git status > # On branch m

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] (was: Re: buglet in 1ec7b6a4 (?))

On Aug 31, 2011, at 3:55 AM, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 12:08 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: >> >> does not fix this for the one-argument case, however, due to an error >