On 02/17/2012 05:52 PM, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 17:55 +0100, Riccardo Magliocchetti wrote:
$ ./soffice.bin
terminate called after throwing an instance of
'com::sun::star::loader::CannotActivateFactoryException'
Aborted (core dumped)
...
Nice - IMHO this is all a bit
On 02/17/2012 03:51 PM, Michael Meeks wrote:
Any chance you can merge it to -3-5 yourself ?
done
Stephan
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi Philipp
Thanks for your response and your hints on how to contribute - I'll keep
that in mind for future contributions :) And also thanks for the review!
-- Dave
On 17/02/12 18:02, Philipp Weissenbacher wrote:
> Hello you two!
>
> Thanks for the big amount of work. I know how tiresome it is
Hi,
Lightprrof grammar checker options UI was enabled for localization in
3.5.0, and many teams have translations. I did not have time to tweak
the makefiles in order to have translations built into the extensions.
Now it's done.
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/dictionaries/commit/?id=312
Hello, good people,
In view of 3.5.1 freeze, I released new version of libvisio,
incorporating Bruno Girin's work on line-markers, Eilidh's work on
embedded OLE objects that are part of the shape stencil, as well as some
random fixes and modifications to cope with the new behaviour of Draw
concern
And the URL is naturally here:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=21366a4b95defb007ddccd409126536a6e8dc50d
F.
On 20/02/12 10:20, Fridrich Strba wrote:
> Hello, good people,
>
> In view of 3.5.1 freeze, I released new version of libvisio,
> incorporating Bruno Girin's work on
On 02/18/2012 03:21 PM, julien2412 wrote:
This subject, switch/if else, reminded me what I read recently on the
Stroustrup book.
1) The fact that "switch allows a better quality machine code".
I wouldn't bet anything on that one. Compilers should be able to
automatically identify if-else-chai
Jonathan Aquilina wrote (19 februari 2012 17:31)
>What version of make does your system have? It seems like the 3.81
>version has a bug with multithreaded builds. I know there is a patch
>that was compiled by one of the devs, just not sure where you can get it
>the patch for it.
3.82-140.1
Wi
On 02/19/2012 02:28 AM, walter wrote:
The build fails in module 125.
After re-run inside the module:
=
(1/1) Building module translations
=
Entering /cygdrive/c/LO350/translations
dmake: Error: -- `/cygdrive/c/LO350/solver/wntmsci12.pro/bin/localize' not
found, and can'
On 20/02/12 10:21, Fridrich Strba wrote:
> And the URL is naturally here:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=21366a4b95defb007ddccd409126536a6e8dc50d
And the issues immediately reported are fixed here:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=f241f91e03c25d337
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 18:22 +1030, Josh Heidenreich wrote:
> Okay so it might be nuts, but has anyone tried creating a native VS
> solution/projects, which ruins inside the ide? Could one be created
> cmake style perhaps?
Ruins ? :-) I suspect that, unless this can be compiled from the
gn
Hi,
See
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=9592f56323de27f9e1d890ee6259a5f4f328cbd3
It's an issue in the Writer UNO API, so it affects at least docx and RTF
import, an RTF reproducer is attached. If some importer already worked
around this issue by inserting empty paragraphs
On 02/19/2012 01:31 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Tim Retout wrote:
cleandiff.pl # used in 'create_patch' target of
solenv/inc/tg_ext.mk, but I can't find 'create_patch' in any
makefiles. Is this likely to be called manually?
yes, I believe that is a helper t
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 08:52 +0100, walter wrote:
> have removed my local directory and I have re-cloned the project.
Wow - that's expensive. I'd really not do that - if you want to clean
your tree: 'make clean' and git reset --hard can do that for you.
> The error remains the same.
> Okay so it might be nuts, but has anyone tried creating a native VS
> solution/projects, which ruins inside the ide?
In theory it should be fairly trivial to create a "native" (whatever
that means) VS solution that just runs the same Cygwin make that you
would start manually otherwise.
But I gu
> Okay so it might be nuts, but has anyone tried creating a native VS
> solution/projects, which ruins inside the ide? Could one be created cmake
> style perhaps?
5 years ago I did that for a non trivial Open Source project (it
included gtk, python, gstreamer, etc.).
I would say it was more or les
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 15:38 +1030, Josh Heidenreich wrote:
> I decided to begin some work looking through the cppcheck [1] errors.
> I found a nullPointer in
> svx/source/svdraw/svdotextpathdecomposition.cxx.
Your patch looks very sensible ! :-) please do push it.
Thanks !
On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 17:54 +0100, Sophie Gautier wrote:
> Hi Drew,
> On 16/02/2012 06:50, drew wrote:
> [...]
> >
> > Just to wrap this thread up, I suppose.
> >
> > Well, after adding --enable-gtk3 it works.
> >
> > Had some issues related to the firewall, but got around that - turned it
> > off
On llu 20 feb 2012 10:07:08 CET, Andras Timar wrote:
Hi,
Lightprrof grammar checker options UI was enabled for localization in
3.5.0, and many teams have translations. I did not have time to tweak
the makefiles in order to have translations built into the extensions.
Now it's done.
http://cgit.
On 02/20/2012 10:43 AM, Fridrich Strba wrote:
On 20/02/12 10:21, Fridrich Strba wrote:
And the URL is naturally here:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=21366a4b95defb007ddccd409126536a6e8dc50d
And the issues immediately reported are fixed here:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org
Now, after a full re-clone, I have a build error in 'reportbuilder'.
Please see logs http://pastebin.com/u/walterLO
Best Regards
walter
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Stephan Bergmann [mailto:sberg...@red
I normally specify the autogen parameter --without-java when building on
Windows.
It just seems to be very fragile there.
On 2012-02-20 12:28, walter wrote:
Now, after a full re-clone, I have a build error in 'reportbuilder'.
Please see logs http://pastebin.com/u/walterLO
Best Regards
walter
On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 05:49 -0800, julien2412 wrote:
> I let a comment about this bug
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46180#c3.
> I'm stucked because I don't know what's the use of the boolean variables
> quoted in the comment.
Does Lionel's feedback help ? :-)
Tha
Michael Meeks píše v Po 20. 02. 2012 v 09:56 +:
> On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 08:52 +0100, walter wrote:
> > have removed my local directory and I have re-cloned the project.
>
> Wow - that's expensive. I'd really not do that - if you want to clean
> your tree: 'make clean' and git reset --har
If I specify --without-java what does change in using LO under windows ?
Best regards
Walter
-Messaggio originale-
Da: libreoffice-bounces+w.guerrieri=ranocchilab@lists.freedesktop.org
[mailto:libreoffice-bounces+w.guerrieri=ranocchilab@lists.freedesktop.or
g] Per conto di Noel G
It means that certain extensions cannot be used. For example,
reportbuilder and help-indexing.
On 2012-02-20 12:38, walter wrote:
If I specify --without-java what does change in using LO under windows ?
Best regards
Walter
-Messaggio originale-
Da: libreoffice-bounces+w.guerrieri=ran
Hi Julien,
> I began to run static analyzer and posted some output on the easyhack here :
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39596
I'm getting the message
scan-build: Removing directory '/tmp/scan-build-2012-02-20-1' because
it contains no reports.
How did you get scan-build to gener
On Sat, 2012-02-18 at 21:18 +, Kate Goss wrote:
> Quick question - Can anyone point me to list of supported browsers for
> the bug submission assistant?
I don't believe we have one :-) but I would say - whatever makes most
sense, ie. forget IE6, and anything else old that causes sign
Hi,
please note that the commit deadline for 3.5.1-rc1 is today, February 20, 2012.
The branch libreoffice-3-5-1 is going to be created the day after. Only
commits with 3 reviewers will be allowed for that branch.
See also
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan#3.5_release
http://wiki.do
On 20/02/12 11:28, walter wrote:
> Now, after a full re-clone, I have a build error in 'reportbuilder'.
> Please see logs http://pastebin.com/u/walterLO
looking at the log it seems like you have a --with-lang setting and for
none of the languages you have enabled there is a translation of the
desc
On Sat, 2012-02-18 at 14:23 +0100, walter wrote:
> Please see logs AT http://pastebin.com/u/walterLO
Could it be that your translation/ repository is still on 'master' but
your core/ repository is on libreoffice-3-5 ? If so you'd want to do:
./g checkout libreoffice-3-5
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 09:44:50AM +, Michael Meeks wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 18:22 +1030, Josh Heidenreich wrote:
> > Okay so it might be nuts, but has anyone tried creating a native VS
> > solution/projects, which ruins inside the ide? Could one be created
> > cmake style perhaps?
>
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 11:25 +0100, Xuacu Saturio wrote:
> I was about to start working in Asturian Lightproof checker when I was
> told our Asturian spellchecker people were working in languagetool.
:-)
> Please, can you tell us which is/will be the default grammar checker
> (if any)?
But .. isn't there a project that involves the complete replacement of the
MS compiler?
Best Regards
walter
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361
--- Comment #191 from sasha.libreoff...@gmail.com 2012-02-20 03:28:27 PST ---
mentioned above bug 46144 is regression since version 3.4
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mai
Hi Tim,
On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 14:39 +, Tim Retout wrote:
> These three patches remove some home-grown path manipulation from
> solenv, and replace it with functions shipped with the Perl core.
Great :-) thanks for that, it's always nice to use standard methods
instead of custom / hand
> But .. isn't there a project that involves the complete replacement of the
> MS compiler?
Yes. But that is not used *on* Windows. The subject of this thread is
"Building LibreOffice *on* Windows".
MinGW (the commonly used name for the GNU compiler and tool-chain when
targeting Windows) is supp
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 01:36:46PM +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> OpenOffice.org, at least back when Sun/Oracle still was behind it, had
> a few (?) people working on using MinGW on Windows. We are not
> interested in that. Correspondingly they had not worked on
> cross-compilation (to any platform)
> AFAIK that was a pure community effort and not backed by Sun/Oracle.
I meant that Sun/Oracle was behind OpenOffice.org.
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Speaking with Italo Vignoli (The Document Foundation) I understood that the
goal was to use only open source tools so you do not have to depend in any way
by the owners tools, such as Microsoft.
Best regards
walter
-Messaggio originale-
Da: libreoffice-bounces+w.guerrieri=ranocchilab.
Michael Meeks-2 wrote
>
> On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 05:49 -0800, julien2412 wrote:
>> I let a comment about this bug
>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46180#c3.
>> I'm stucked because I don't know what's the use of the boolean variables
>> quoted in the comment.
>
> Does Lionel's
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 01:13 +0100, Petr Vorel wrote:
> another bit of unused core removed.
Thanks for that, pushed :-)
Michael.
--
michael.me...@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
Lib
On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 19:04 +0100, Santiago Martinez wrote:
> This patch removes unused code as listed in unusedcode.easy
Pushed, thanks :-)
Michael.
--
michael.me...@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
___
LibreO
Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
> Have been poking around the LO code today trying to decide where I
> might put break points to help in tracking this. Looks like this
> occurs (for my sample) when auto-save kicks in, so I may place a
> break point in the auto save code and then start stepping thro
> Speaking with Italo Vignoli (The Document Foundation) I understood that the
> goal was to use only open source tools so you do not have to depend in any
> way by the owners tools, such as Microsoft.
Bah. I don't agree with that.
After all, we are talking about building software to run on a
Mi
On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 18:42 +0100, Mariusz Dykierek wrote:
> Performance improvement unlikely yet readability/intent clearer + cppcheck
> satisfied.
Found pushed :-)
Thanks,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
___
Hi Thorsten,
Thanks for the update on this poll.
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 12:08, Thorsten Behrens
wrote:
> Dear members,
>
> the poll for the LibreOffice 2012 conference closed last night. You
> can review the full ballot here:
>
> https://elections.documentfoundation.org/votes.php?election_id=2
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 00:33 +0800, Elton Chung wrote:
> This patch removes 14 unused methods from basegfx.
Pushed; thanks :-)
Michael.
--
michael.me...@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
___
LibreOffice mailing l
Hi,
Would it be possible to have a Windows tinderbox build a private
branch of mine? It would roughly be libreoffice-3-5 plus most of my
commits to master.
As far as the LibreOffice project is concerned, this would allow me to
dogfood the changes I do to master in production => a better Base in
3
Hi Jesus, Tor, *,
> It can be done, yes. But it requires several months of work from
> someone who knows what is doing and the result would probably be a
> nightmare to maintain.
Did you go with cmake, a cmake-style solution (something which
converted makefiles to VS projects) or manually maintai
On 02/16/2012 01:49 PM, Michael Meeks wrote:
This is not really my sphere of expertise, so review appreciated.
Rather than clobber the DesktopContext with some out-of band magic
(which creates the JavaInteractionHandler that in the end complains). I
thought I'd just give this guy a nil co
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 03:49:02AM -0800, julien2412 wrote:
> Michael Meeks wrote
>> On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 05:49 -0800, julien2412 wrote:
>>> I let a comment about this bug
>>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46180#c3.
>>> I'm stucked because I don't know what's the use of the boolean
Hi,
This patch removes another 16 unused methods.
Best Regards,
Elton
--
Elton Chung
Administrator, Sponsor of mirror.layerjet.com
Language Maintainer, Tester of ReactOS Project | http://reactos.org
Email: el...@layerjet.com
-
On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 14:48 +0100, Eike Rathke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please review and cherry-pick to 3-5 and 3-4
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=5d6af4f2947432a55324e4f5cc67bca202f939e9
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=4e0928278df9e327dac9ac4d0ebf40bf
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 00:31 +0100, Matúš Kukan wrote:
> It fails in testtools/source/bridgetest/
And removing the unxlng* in testtools are forcing a rebuild there
doesn't help ?, i.e. this might be an unrelated thing with a partial
rebuild with missing dependency information in the old dmake-based
On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 13:36 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> But it's normal that the internal copy of LO is outdated. See also icu :-)
Its hard to update icu because the latest versions don't come with the
makefiles (or script or whatever they are) to build it with express 2008
under windows, so it
On 20 February 2012 11:30, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 14:39 +, Tim Retout wrote:
> Great :-) thanks for that, it's always nice to use standard methods
> instead of custom / hand-coded ones. Clearly we want to introduce new
> perl dependencies on shared modules only wit
On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 22:50 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 09:00:31PM +, ke...@suse.cz wrote:
> [...]
> > d40a7f1 make gengal work again
>
> is the breaking one.
>
> > [ info ALL ] Currently known executables: bestreversemap bmp bmpsum
> > cppunit/cppunittester cr
Stephan Bergmann píše v Po 20. 02. 2012 v 13:42 +0100:
> On 02/16/2012 01:49 PM, Michael Meeks wrote:
> > This is not really my sphere of expertise, so review appreciated.
> > Rather than clobber the DesktopContext with some out-of band magic
> > (which creates the JavaInteractionHandler that i
Hi Caolán,
On Monday, 2012-02-20 13:27:01 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> +1 on review, but they conflict horribly in multiple places on 3-4 and
> 3-5. I suggest you fix them up and push them yourself with my signoff
The joy of having properly indented the files on master ... thanks for
trying ;
Hi Kendy, *,
Jan Holesovsky wrote (14-02-12 14:47)
Winfried Donkers píše v Út 14. 02. 2012 v 07:44 +0100:
Can this patch be pushed to 3.4 and 3.5 branches as well?
The patch addresses problem that go way back in time (pre-LibreOffice at least).
The problem is that it is partially a feature,
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 10:07 +0100, Andras Timar wrote:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/dictionaries/commit/?id=312a744c1c8a4afce0fe06a4423d97ebb883fc6d
>
> Please cherry-pick to 3-5.
done
C.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.fre
Hi Noel,
On 14.02.2012 15:25, Noel Grandin wrote:
Note that I tried converting these usages to boost::ptr_map, but I ran
into entirely undecipherable C++ template errors.
Sorry for the late review... :(
What line produces that error? I suppose we should do use ptr_map,
because even you forgo
On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 18:49 +0100, Gert van Valkenhoef wrote:
> Thanks again for the help. Attached a new series of patches (cumulative
> with the previously sent ones and Caolan's), in which (I think) all the
> Java invocations have been removed in favor of using the C++ components:
>
> 1) Im
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 02:06:37PM +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> The main problem in building LibreOffice for Windows on Windows
> currently is that the *open source* stuff used in the build, i.e.
> Cygwin, is slow and causes random errors. The Microsoft compiler and
> linker work fine. If the
Hi,
On Monday, 2012-02-20 13:42:01 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 13:36 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > But it's normal that the internal copy of LO is outdated. See also icu :-)
>
> Its hard to update icu because the latest versions don't come with the
> makefiles (or sc
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 16:38, Ivan Timofeev wrote:
> Hi Noel,
>
>
> What line produces that error? I suppose we should do use ptr_map, because
> even you forgot to delete object :)
The error was sourced several levels down in the boost stuff, and the
originating point was everywhere I tried to a
Hi *
About windows / Cygwin performance.
I have noted that on my machine the cl.exe process is unable to push a cpu
core to the limit.
The best that the cl.exe can is 13% cpu usage without any I/O activity.
Where is the time spent ?
Any Idea ?
I have a i7 870 @ 2.93 GHz, HT enabled.
Best,
Walter
On 20.02.2012 19:12, Noel Grandin wrote:
The error was sourced several levels down in the boost stuff, and the
originating point was everywhere I tried to assign into ptr_map.
I think it had something to with the copyability of the Font class.
Did you try to use 'insert(key, value)' instead of
I think there are 2 different points :
1) to list files in a directory with extension filter
2) to open a file with or without extension
About 2), I agree with the fact we should look at the content and,
considering your comment
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46180#c5, it should be o
Hi all,
I hereby declare that my past and future contributions to LibreOffice are
licensed under the LGPL v3+ and the MPL v1.1.
Best wishes,
Gert van Valkenhoef
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.or
Hi Andrew, *,
Thorsten Behrens wrote (20-02-12 12:59)
Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
Have been poking around the LO code today trying to decide where I
might put break points to help in tracking this. Looks like this
occurs (for my sample) when auto-save kicks in, so I may place a
break point
> I have noted that on my machine the cl.exe process is unable to push a cpu
> core to the limit.
My experience is the opposite; I occasionally see a cl.exe taking over
25% CPU on a four-core system (not HT)... Might of course just be
rounding errors; in any case for compilations taking a long tim
> I think that is oversimplifying things quite a bit.
Well, what isn't? Excuse me for writing quick emails without spending
a week researching first.
> While there are some
> stability issues with cygwin
"some" stability issues?
> when combined with evil Windows necessities like
> in-memory-vir
On 18 February 2012 09:43, jumbo444 wrote:
> Actually all use of PRODUCT was removed from the code (if I correctly
> greped). However it may also be necessary to remove the definition of
> PRODUCT. I was not able to understand clearly how it is defined. I found
> some PRODUCT="" or PRODUCT="full"
In any case the problem remains that cl.exe is not able to use all the cpu
power.
I think that this problem must be analyzed.
Best,
walter
> I have noted that on my machine the cl.exe process is unable to push a
> cpu core to the limit.
M
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 21:25 +0800, Elton Chung wrote:
> This patch removes another 16 unused methods.
Thanks for that ! :-) are you tempted by any of the Easy Hacks ?
All the best,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
_
> In any case the problem remains that cl.exe is not able to use all the cpu
> power.
You said you see max 13% CPU usage by each cl.exe process on a
four-core, hyperthreading machine (i.e. 8-processor from Windows's
point of view)?
What is 100 divided by 8?
--tml
Andreas Radke píše v Čt 16. 02. 2012 v 18:23 +0100:
> My ArchLinux installation makes use of the file-list/*.txt files to
> split our packages. That way the postgresql-sdbc stuff is missing in
> our installation. I guess they should be added to the base or common
> file list.
The file-list/*.txt f
> Did you go with cmake, a cmake-style solution (something which
> converted makefiles to VS projects) or manually maintained them?
Manually maintained.
I started using cmake but it had to be discarded for some reason.
Unfortunately I don't remember why, but it was a long time ago so it
may not be
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 16:27 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
> thanks for picking this one up.
> Now with 3.5 out in the wild, reports of people loosing data appear. I
> would like to propose this issue as *blocker* for 3.5.1 .. nothing less.
Having a well formed, and reproducible bug report woul
Hi Tim,
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 13:47 +, Tim Retout wrote:
> $ corelist File::Spec
Nice :-)
> Which leads to the question: what is the minimum version of Perl we
> can rely on in LibreOffice? Currently configure.in checks for Perl 5,
I poked Fridrich, the oracle on this s
Hi Michael,
Michael Meeks wrote (20-02-12 17:05)
Having a well formed, and reproducible bug report would be rather
useful :-)
Yes, I think we realise that :-)
Therefore I added some comments on how I can reliably reproduce (more
opening the doc and doing some random work for some tim
Hi Cor,
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 15:22 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
> > Winfried Donkers píše v Út 14. 02. 2012 v 07:44 +0100:
> >> Can this patch be pushed to 3.4 and 3.5 branches as well?
> >> The patch addresses problem that go way back in time (pre-LibreOffice at
> >> least).
:-) it is some
Hi Michael, *,
> Thanks for that ! :-) are you tempted by any of the Easy Hacks ?
I will try them (and ask for some help) when I am more familiar with
the code base.
Best Regards,
Elton
--
Elton Chung
Administrator, Sponsor of mirror.layerjet.com
Language Maintainer, Tester of ReactOS P
[including LO ML on cc, hope you don't mind; context for new readers:
officecfg/CppunitTest_officecfg_cppheader_test.mk requires
officecfg/qa/cppheader.cxx, which indirectly includes headers from
higher up the module hierarchy; plain "make" build logs show that the
cxx is needlessly compiled, c
On 02/18/2012 04:29 PM, Michael Meeks wrote:
officecfg/prj/build.lst |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
New commits:
commit 8c67428341d42ada42f9186bbfe3d6f25a0edaef
Author: Michael Meeks
Date: Sat Feb 18 15:28:35 2012 +
WaE: add missing sal and cppunit depend
Yes, indeed, i have taken a huge blindness !!
> In any case the problem remains that cl.exe is not able to use all the
> cpu power.
You said you see max 13% CPU usage by each cl.exe process on a four-core,
hyperthreading machine (i.e. 8-processor from Windows's point of view)?
What is 100 di
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 05:42:11PM +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> And the slowness of Cygwin's forking and executing the various Perl,
> shell and whatnot processes involved in each file being compiled (note
> the pipe to filter-showIncludes.pl) has nothing to do with it?
Not the last time I
Hi there,
On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 17:59 +, Khoo Wei Ming wrote:
> A big kudos to Kristian Rietveld for his hard work described here
> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Building_LibreOffice_with_Clang
Indeed :-)
> So for what it's worth, here's the route I took (by no means
> Not the last time I benchmarked it (which was long before
> filter-showIncludes.pl). For the most part the slowness of forking on windows
> was related to some latency, i.e. a new process would take some time to get
> started, but it wouldnt eat cycles for that, thus making it irrelevant in a
> p
In fact, my problem is that i can't compile using 8 parallel sessions
because often cl.exe freezes.
Best,
walter
-Messaggio originale-
Da: libreoffice-bounces+w.guerrieri=ranocchilab@lists.freedesktop.org
[mailto:libreoffice-bounces+w.guerrieri=ranocchilab@lists.freedesktop.or
g
Hi Michael,
Michael Meeks wrote (20-02-12 17:13)
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 15:22 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
Winfried Donkers píše v Út 14. 02. 2012 v 07:44 +0100:
Can this patch be pushed to 3.4 and 3.5 branches as well?
The patch addresses problem that go way back in time (pre-LibreOffice at least)
On Sat, 2012-02-18 at 09:41 +, Khoo Wei Ming wrote:
> clang flags this as
Nice research, E-mail & patch, pushed :-)
Thanks,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
___
LibreOffic
Attached patch addresses the first fix for fdo45671, the rest will follow one
by one.
This patch is a bit more elaborate than I expect the rest to be as I prepared
the code
for the patches to follow, i.e. for the split buttons that I will be adding.
I have renamed class SvxFontColorExtToolBoxCo
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> [including LO ML on cc, hope you don't mind; context for new readers:
no problem.
> Does anybody have an idea how to solve this elegantly?
>
> One solution might be to undo the mechanism by which a cxx only needed in
> subsequentcheck is
All my contributions will be licensed under MPL/LGPLv3+.
Wei Ming
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On 20 February 2012 16:07, Michael Meeks wrote:
> I poked Fridrich, the oracle on this sort of thing - wrt. our old
> build-systems. On windows we have perl 5.10 but on Linux 5.8.8 ( we have
> an artificially old Linux machine to produce forward-compatible builds).
There are some nice thin
Hi Cor,
On 2012-02-20 at 17:44 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
> > Anyhow - I don't see a special case for bending the rules of triple
> > reviews, nor a reason to refuse it if it gets that widespread
> > support :-) it's a nice fix.
>
> Thanks, that sounds encouraging.
> As written: going for 3.5.2
LibreOffice build succesfully finished.
It took 3 hours on a non-dedicated machine.
Best,
walter
Da: libreoffice-bounces+w.guerrieri=ranocchilab@lists.freedesktop.org
[mailto:libreoffice-bounces+w.guerrieri=ranocchilab@lists.freedesktop.or
g] Per conto di walter
Inviato:
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
