Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Replace command domainname by getdomainname() on Unix

2011-11-13 Thread Francois Tigeot
and if it does something useful, that something should be rewritten to not depend on network resources. -- Francois Tigeot ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice] System nss headers define FREEBSD, break build

2011-11-20 Thread Francois Tigeot
(FREEBSD) section After some more digging I found out FREEBSD is defined in the system version of nspr/prcpucfg.h I'll try to disable the use of system nspr headers as a workaround. -- Francois Tigeot ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice

Re: [Libreoffice] Getting some press about Citrus.

2011-11-25 Thread Francois Tigeot
), Microsoft Word had a mode where the style name for each paragraph was shown on the left of the document beeing edited. I always found that handy. -- Francois Tigeot ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove unused PDP_ENDIAN defines

2011-11-25 Thread Francois Tigeot
The attached patch removes the use of *PDP_ENDIAN* defines; besides the two .h files in the patch, nothing uses them. Please test it on your platform of choice, I'll commit it when I'll be sure it doesn't break anything. -- Francois Tigeot From 804a0660bb66f8453f71768e4407671b2b3b1b6d Mon Sep

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Remove unused PDP_ENDIAN defines

2011-11-25 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 11:59:53AM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: The attached patch removes the use of *PDP_ENDIAN* defines; besides the two .h files in the patch, nothing uses them. Pushed. -- Francois Tigeot ___ LibreOffice mailing list

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-commits] .: solenv/gbuild

2011-11-30 Thread Francois Tigeot
to Bjoern for having re-established the verbose output behavior. -- Francois Tigeot ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] [ANN] LibreOffice 3.5.0 Beta3 available

2012-01-17 Thread Francois Tigeot
it be possible to add links to the source code tarballs for people wanting to build LO themselves ? As far as I know, the tree has not been tagged so the only way to get the exact same sources used to create theses binaries is to download a complete archive. -- Francois Tigeot

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 3.5.0 Beta3 available

2012-01-17 Thread Francois Tigeot
Thanks for your answers Miklos and Christian, On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 02:02:09PM +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Francois Tigeot ftig...@wolfpond.org wrote: On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 12:49:50PM +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote: [...]   http

Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 3.5.0 Beta3 available

2012-01-18 Thread Francois Tigeot
here. :) Ok, thanks all for your answers. I'll create an alias for git and forget about it :) -- Francois Tigeot ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice] Installation instructions for source code release

2011-01-27 Thread Francois Tigeot
me if this list is not the place to ask this sort of questions, but the only installation instructions available on the web site are for the binary packages and the user list wasn't too helpful either. -- Francois Tigeot ___ LibreOffice mailing list

Re: [Libreoffice] Installation instructions for source code release

2011-01-29 Thread Francois Tigeot
Hi, Thanks everyone for your answers. On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:03:42AM +, Michael Meeks wrote: On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 10:27 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: Well, I may become a package maintainer in the future but for that I need to be able to build LO from the released sources first

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Add support for DragonFly in configure.in

2011-01-29 Thread Francois Tigeot
This patch adds support for DragonFly to bootstrap/configure.in DragonFly is a BSD-derived operating system: http://www.dragonflybsd.org/ -- Francois Tigeot diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in index be8aa6c..e5b94fe 100755 --- a/configure.in +++ b/configure.in @@ -1530,6 +1530,15 @@ case

Re: [Libreoffice] Kicking off 3rdparty packages

2011-01-29 Thread Francois Tigeot
#platforms IMHO, there's no reason to include old versions of third-party packages in LibreOffice proper. In addition to all the included junk, I remember OpenOffice needing a special-purpose version of gcc to be compiled. Should we go the same path again ? -- Francois Tigeot

Re: [Libreoffice] Kicking off 3rdparty packages

2011-01-31 Thread Francois Tigeot
generic builds - particularly since we have a QA team that is dispersed across many Linux's. I never said it was; I merely objected to the inclusion of out-of-date and unmaintained software in LO. -- Francois Tigeot ___ LibreOffice mailing list

[Libreoffice] OSF1 typo in set_soenv.in

2011-02-01 Thread Francois Tigeot
. -- Francois Tigeot ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] OSF1 typo in set_soenv.in

2011-02-03 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 01:19:13PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 22:09 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: It would seem that Open/LibreOffice has not been able to be built on OSF1 systems for more than 2 years, and no one has noticed so far. Hmm, I don't think

Re: [Libreoffice] Need help with compile error. Was: How do I update my download?

2011-02-04 Thread Francois Tigeot
=true in your shell to get some details about the failing command. -- Francois Tigeot ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice] libtextcat patches

2011-02-04 Thread Francois Tigeot
of libtextcat I should be aware of ? -- Francois Tigeot ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] libtextcat patches

2011-02-04 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 07:49:26AM +0100, David Tardon wrote: On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 09:03:55PM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: LibreOffice does not build with a stock libtextcat. [...] Are these patches only maintained in LO ? libtextcat package in Fedora contains them. I've also

[Libreoffice] Build fails in i18npool

2011-02-04 Thread Francois Tigeot
/types.rdb Exception on createRegistryServiceFactory dmake: Error code 1, while making '../../../unxdflyx3.pro/misc/localedata_en_AU.cxx' -- Francois Tigeot ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org

Re: [Libreoffice] Build fails in i18npool

2011-02-05 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 04:00:39PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Sat, 2011-02-05 at 08:43 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: I can't get the build to stop failing in i18npool. The only error message is Exception on createRegistryServiceFactory and I can't get any more details. Try

Re: [Libreoffice] Build fails in i18npool

2011-02-05 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 08:52:19PM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 04:00:39PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Sat, 2011-02-05 at 08:43 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: I can't get the build to stop failing in i18npool. The only error message is Exception

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Build fails in i18npool

2011-02-06 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 11:52:33PM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 08:52:19PM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 04:00:39PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Sat, 2011-02-05 at 08:43 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: I can't get the build to stop

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Build fails in i18npool

2011-02-06 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 03:05:43PM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 11:52:33PM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 08:52:19PM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 04:00:39PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Sat, 2011-02-05 at 08:43

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] Build fails in i18npool

2011-02-06 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 02:32:32PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 15:10 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: The attached patch prints the exception message in saxparser.cxx. It would be useful to have it in tree. Looks reasonable to me, pushed, thanks for this. Great

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] Build fails in i18npool

2011-02-06 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 03:47:07PM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 02:32:32PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 15:10 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: The attached patch prints the exception message in saxparser.cxx. It would be useful to have

[Libreoffice] Strange Shared object xxx not found errors

2011-02-07 Thread Francois Tigeot
no error and the target libpyuno.so is correctly created. I can't figure out why the build keeps stopping with these Shared object not found errors. Is there any way to have dmake print the commands it is trying to run or give more information on what it is actually doing ? -- Francois Tigeot

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] Build fails in i18npool

2011-02-08 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 01:47:17PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 15:47 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: Oh, and by the way, createRegistryServiceFactory() used in saxparser.cxx is deprecated in OpenOffice: A lot of things that are deprecated remain in there, not enough

Re: [Libreoffice] Strange Shared object xxx not found errors

2011-02-08 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 09:30:56PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 19:35 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: My builds are now crashing in the same way in a few modules; pyuno is one of them. --enable-new-dtags ... The library is present in /usr/pkg/lib/libpython2.6.so

Re: [Libreoffice] Strange Shared object xxx not found errors

2011-02-09 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 08:47:46AM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: I don't think --enable-new-dtags was the culprit. I have updated the sources with g pull since my last mail and I only get these errors now: /usr/libexec/binutils217/elf/ld: cannot find -luno_sal /usr/libexec/binutils217/elf

Re: [Libreoffice] Strange Shared object xxx not found errors

2011-02-09 Thread Francois Tigeot
tangible to search for ! so check if /path/to/solver is correct, perhaps the source/buildtree got moved or moved around. Is this head or 3.3.X branch ? This is -head (master). -- Francois Tigeot ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice

Re: [Libreoffice] Strange Shared object xxx not found errors

2011-02-09 Thread Francois Tigeot
= *Env.Set.sh You're right, I'm the culprit for this one. I somehow missed one if ($platform = ~m/.../) line in set_soenv.inc -- Francois Tigeot ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo

[Libreoffice] Dragonfly patches

2011-02-09 Thread Francois Tigeot
a build, but I hope to reduce the differences with -head with this batch. License is LGPLv3/MPL. -- Francois Tigeot diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in index f210dd4..0425d35 100755 --- a/configure.in +++ b/configure.in @@ -3805,7 +3805,7 @@ if test $enable_epm = yes; then AIX

[Libreoffice] Segmentation faults in unit tests

2011-02-12 Thread Francois Tigeot
of 'com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException' [1]15465 abort (core dumped) LD_LIBRARY_PATH= ../../unxdflyx3.pro/lib/libswdoctest.so -headless -invisibl -- Francois Tigeot ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http

Re: [Libreoffice] Segmentation faults in unit tests

2011-02-13 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 09:30:17PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 20:34 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: LibreOffice builds now run for almost 3 hours before failing on DragonFly. The errors are always of the same sort: some kind of segmentation fault with an unit test

Re: [Libreoffice] Segmentation faults in unit tests

2011-02-13 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 11:56:21PM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 09:30:17PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: See http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/How_to_debug#Debugging_cppunit_tests There's a problem with the cppunit debugging implementation. When I

Re: [Libreoffice] Dragonfly patches

2011-02-14 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 08:27:53AM +0100, Fridrich Strba wrote: Taking mutex on this one will work on its integration today. On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 23:47 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: There's still work to do but the progress so far has been good. I'd like to take advantage

Re: [Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-15 Thread Francois Tigeot
plan to remove all traces of OSF1 / DECUNIX and 386BSD (which has been dead since 1993 or so) -- Francois Tigeot ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] Files without Copyright notice

2011-02-15 Thread Francois Tigeot
LibreOffice was forked... http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/bootstrap/diff/solenv/inc/unxobsd.mk?id=773db1a598d5800ca5e37258d3fbf397d8ffc4f2 -- Francois Tigeot ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http

Re: [Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-15 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 09:05:15PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 18:34 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: - i386 / amd64 - power / powerppc - sparc / sparc64 - arm - mips - alpha http://porting.openoffice.org/ might help btw. FWIW We (Red Hat, Inc.) build/ship

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Missing DragonFly file

2011-02-16 Thread Francois Tigeot
Well, it's not really a patch but a new file. This is the last missing piece to complete a build on DragonFly. It should be put into bootstrap/solenv/inc/ -- Francois Tigeot # Version: MPL 1.1 / GPLv3+ / LGPLv3+ # # The contents of this file are subject to the Mozilla Public License Version

Re: [Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-16 Thread Francois Tigeot
LibreOffice has ever run on HP/UX. What about SCO ? Maybe we should put an announcement on the web site or something. It would be a shame to remove support for a platform still in use by someone. -- Francois Tigeot ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice

Re: [Libreoffice] Supported arches

2011-02-16 Thread Francois Tigeot
. Are the UUID_SYSTEM_TIME_RESOLUTION_100NS_TICKS defines in sal/inc/rtl/uuid.h a part of that ? It looked completely bogus to me. -- Francois Tigeot ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove unused macro

2011-02-16 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 01:06:47PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 13:03 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 08:55:12AM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: Are the UUID_SYSTEM_TIME_RESOLUTION_100NS_TICKS defines in sal/inc/rtl/uuid.h a part

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove OSF/1 support

2011-02-16 Thread Francois Tigeot
-mingw.patch but since they are patches, I didn't dare modify them. I have also let dmake/ untouched. -- Francois Tigeot diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in index 45a22cd..ddf1614 100755 --- a/configure.in +++ b/configure.in @@ -1470,12 +1470,6 @@ case $host_os in AC_MSG_RESULT

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove OSF/1 support

2011-02-16 Thread Francois Tigeot
Hi Thomas, On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 09:15:37PM +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote: in the meantime I removed HPUX and SCO support. Found out, that osarch.pm is pretty unused ;) Seems like good ideas are common these days :-) -- Francois Tigeot

Re: [Libreoffice] WIN16 references

2011-02-16 Thread Francois Tigeot
have thought there was Windows 3.x code in there !! -- Francois Tigeot ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] WIN16 references

2011-02-17 Thread Francois Tigeot
. -- Francois Tigeot ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] Build speedup

2011-02-17 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:08:58AM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: CSET is probably also complete foo IIRC. Though I don't know to what it referred. I don't know if these cleanups are the reason, but my builds are now faster by a few minutes. I'm down to 2:38 on a 3GHz Core 2. -- Francois

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Initializes the runtime library paths on DragonFly

2011-02-17 Thread Francois Tigeot
One small patch needed at runtime -- Francois Tigeot diff --git a/desktop/scripts/soffice.sh b/desktop/scripts/soffice.sh index e485b11..caa975c 100644 --- a/desktop/scripts/soffice.sh +++ b/desktop/scripts/soffice.sh @@ -70,7 +70,8 @@ fi sd_binary=`basename $0 | sed 's/libreoffice/soffice/g

Re: [Libreoffice] javaldx /proc test in ooinstall

2011-02-17 Thread Francois Tigeot
the check ;-) I kinda understand that. Java can be such a pain... The good news is that in 3.4 we will have a totally different component registration mechanism, so - we can kill that check on master pre-emptively (perhaps). How about that ? :-) I'm in full agreement :-) -- Francois

[Libreoffice] Is testing/testautomation really needed ?

2011-02-17 Thread Francois Tigeot
Following the removal of files in testing/testautomation/framework/optional I had a look in test/testautomation/ and the files there seemed largely unused. I have removed this directory from my local git tree; I had no trouble building and installing LibreOffice afterwards. -- Francois Tigeot

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] Initializes the runtime library paths on DragonFly

2011-02-18 Thread Francois Tigeot
Hi Jan, On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 09:30:06AM +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote: Francois Tigeot píše v Čt 17. 02. 2011 v 18:29 +0100: One small patch needed at runtime Thank you, pushed! :-) Thanks :-) If you can send the further patches as the output of git format-patch HEAD~ (you have

Re: [Libreoffice] Is testing/testautomation really needed ?

2011-02-18 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 09:38:59AM +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote: Hi Francois, Francois Tigeot píše v Čt 17. 02. 2011 v 23:32 +0100: Following the removal of files in testing/testautomation/framework/optional I had a look in test/testautomation/ and the files there seemed largely unused

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] javaldx /proc test in ooinstall

2011-02-18 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 06:40:11PM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 05:25:06PM +, Michael Meeks wrote: Well; javaldx sets up the LD_LIBRARY_PATH for java to 'actually work' It also used to be the case that without /proc mounted it would crash and burn[1

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove SCO references in ure

2011-02-18 Thread Francois Tigeot
This patch gets rid of some remaining SCO tests. What's strange is that there were references in sal/osl/os2/ It seems the os2/ files are a straight copy of the unx/ files. Is it possible to merge them ? -- Francois Tigeot From 2c3aad464aef23602c402c185d67ec8a33d244e8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001

[Libreoffice] Build failure in writer/sw/source/ui/index/cnttab.cxx

2011-02-19 Thread Francois Tigeot
OSL_ENSURE(it != aControlList.begin() it != aControlList.rbegin(), Button at first or last position?); I believe there should be a cast to const somewhere for aControlList.rbegin() but I am no C++ programmer and cannot write a fix for this expression. -- Francois Tigeot

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] 386BSD and MACH defines.

2011-02-21 Thread Francois Tigeot
#define is MACOSX -- Francois Tigeot From 2be829651458fe5443f1c22f915b88d562a00131 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Francois Tigeot ftig...@wolfpond.org Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 17:08:54 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Remove 386BSD support. --- soltools/mkdepend/imakemdep.h |2 +- 1 files changed, 1

Re: [Libreoffice] Is testing/testautomation really needed ?

2011-02-21 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 11:28:19AM -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote: On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 10:28 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: There's some value in that. I've attached a small patch instead ;) Looks like someone has already applied this patch (?) It would be helpful if whoever applies

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Remove OSF/1 support

2011-02-21 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 08:49:47PM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: The attached patches remove OSF/1 support from the build system and some application code. Pushed. For the record, these patches and subsequent ones can be considered to be LGPLv3+/MPL unless stated otherwise -- Francois Tigeot

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] 386BSD and MACH defines.

2011-02-21 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 04:25:37PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 17:19 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: The attached patch a 386BSD #defined test (the only one ?) Go for it, Pushed. that mkdepend is derived from some imake mkdepend or something, hence the old platforms

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Remove SCO references in ure

2011-02-21 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 08:43:20PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 11:37 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: This patch gets rid of some remaining SCO tests. Go ahead and push this yourself now. Done. What's strange is that there were references in sal/osl/os2/ It seems

[Libreoffice] Need help with failing cppunit tests

2011-02-23 Thread Francois Tigeot
it. I have attached two files: - build.log, the output of dmake in sc/qa/unit - gdbtrace.log I may have missed something stupid, like a path element but for now I'm stuck. Any help would be much appreciated ! -- Francois Tigeot build -- version: 275224 = Building module sc

Re: [Libreoffice] Need help with failing cppunit tests

2011-02-23 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 12:36:14PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 09:46 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: For now, I'm focussing on sc/qa/unit. Because your log shows OK (10) before it falls over and dies, I believe that the tests themselves are passing, and you are dying

[Libreoffice] Assertion failure in osl_process.cxx

2011-02-23 Thread Francois Tigeot
Failures: 1 Errors: 0 dmake: Error code 1, while making 'test2' -- Francois Tigeot ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] Need help with failing cppunit tests

2011-02-23 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 02:13:34PM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 12:36:14PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: Another possibility is some nasty atexit/__cxa_atexit problem. A hack to experiment for that possibility can be found at http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives

Re: [Libreoffice] Assertion failure in osl_process.cxx

2011-02-25 Thread Francois Tigeot
. I had to comment some code for an unrelated failure; I'll send a separate mail for that one. -- Francois Tigeot ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice] Build failure in DbAdminImpl.cxx

2011-02-25 Thread Francois Tigeot
this commit is to blame: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/base/commit/?id=a66fec7123aa82cf441066cf91e0e287450f0784 -- Francois Tigeot ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: [Libreoffice] Need help with failing cppunit tests

2011-02-28 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:56:56AM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:11:46AM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 09:30 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: With STAR_RESOURCEPATH set, gdb ends up in an eternal wait state, exactly like when I ran it from

Re: [Libreoffice] Need help with failing cppunit tests

2011-02-28 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 09:26:46PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 20:07 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x000801535510 in ?? () (gdb) bt #0 0x000801535510 in ?? () #1 0x0008010b7db9 in __cxa_finalize

Re: [Libreoffice] re-enable icons on Linux for KDE

2011-03-02 Thread Francois Tigeot
3.x developpement: http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/ -- Francois Tigeot ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] Need help with failing cppunit tests

2011-03-07 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 12:07:22AM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 09:26:46PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: This confirms the theory anyway. Doesn't help exactly pin down the problem, but it does point to some global dtor, or explicit atexit/cxa_finalize handler, so

[Libreoffice] Cannot save .ods and .odt files

2011-03-07 Thread Francois Tigeot
files works fine. How can I know what exactly is going wrong ? -- Francois Tigeot ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] Need help with failing cppunit tests

2011-03-07 Thread Francois Tigeot
. The only issue I've found at runtime so far is I'm unable to save normal .odt or .ods files but this may not be related. I've not yet encountered a single LibreOffice crash. -- Francois Tigeot ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org

Re: [Libreoffice] Cannot save .ods and .odt files

2011-03-07 Thread Francois Tigeot
Hi Kevin, Thanks for the help. On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 07:02:30AM -0500, Kevin Hunter wrote: At 3:11am -0500 Mon, 07 Mar 2011, Francois Tigeot wrote: The dialog box just closes itself and reopens half a second later. No file is written to disk. Saving .fods and .fodt files works fine

Re: [Libreoffice] Cannot save .ods and .odt files

2011-03-07 Thread Francois Tigeot
Hi Michael, On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 12:38:28PM +, Michael Meeks wrote: On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 09:11 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: The dialog box just closes itself and reopens half a second later. No file is written to disk. What fun :-) Yeah :-/ you mentioned that your

Re: [Libreoffice] Cannot save .ods and .odt files

2011-03-07 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 11:35:15AM -0500, Kevin Hunter wrote: At 10:51am -0500 Mon, 07 Mar 2011, Francois Tigeot wrote: Well, I was also thinking about a printf-like solution. I just hoped to not have to rebuild a binary, it takes almost two hours and a half... That's just it: you don't

Re: [Libreoffice] Cannot save .ods and .odt files

2011-03-07 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 03:43:27PM +, Michael Meeks wrote: On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 15:34 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: The output is almost unreadable: it seems LO constantly runs poll() and gettimeofday(). That would be interacting with the X server ;-) try not to use the mouse

Re: [Libreoffice] Free JRE for Windows?

2011-03-11 Thread Francois Tigeot
a jdk on our users. -- Francois Tigeot ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] dev300 merge thoughts / some lessons ...

2011-03-18 Thread Francois Tigeot
the last code drop introduced a new dependency to GNU cp: $ ./autogen.sh [blah] [...] checking for cp... /bin/cp checking whether /bin/cp is GNU cp from coreutils with preserve= support... configure: error: no, GNU cp needed. install or specify with --with-gnu-cp=/path/to/it -- Francois Tigeot

Re: [Libreoffice] GNU cp dependency

2011-03-18 Thread Francois Tigeot
Hi Bjoern, On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 05:36:02AM +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 23:17:34 +0100 Francois Tigeot ftig...@wolfpond.org wrote: configure: error: no, GNU cp needed. install or specify with --with-gnu-cp=/path/to/it As the guy who changed that (back when I

Re: [Libreoffice] GNU cp dependency

2011-03-20 Thread Francois Tigeot
Hey Bjoern, On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 01:05:07AM +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 06:09:10 +0100 Francois Tigeot ftig...@wolfpond.org wrote: Well, all my builds of the last few month were run without it. That is luck and you dont want to count on that. Anyone using

[PATCH] Broken check for Boost::Date_Time in configure.in

2012-07-26 Thread Francois Tigeot
Boost::Date_time is in fact perfectly functional and the configure script reports a non-existing error. Removing the check is enough to make LibreOffice-3.6 build again (see attached patch). -- Francois Tigeot From 080bbbc053c415d07c4d4ae74e68effb6898024e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q

[PATCH] Fix a library not found error

2012-07-28 Thread Francois Tigeot
of testtools/CustomTarget_bridgetest.mk and ensures CustomTarget_uno_test.mk succeeds in all cases. It should be committed to -master and the -3.6 branch if possible. -- Francois Tigeot From a2fee1ba5cc96bdf4a493b16897504e0e789aa07 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Fran=C3=A7ois=20Tigeot

[PATCH] Unify OUTPATH values

2012-05-26 Thread Francois Tigeot
. Since it is potentially intrusive, I prefer to show it here for review instead of committing it directly. -- Francois Tigeot From d726ef2fca9430395010f0e6d34469f34583c78a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Fran=C3=A7ois=20Tigeot?= ftig...@wolfpond.org Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 12:48:42 +0200

Re: [PATCH] Unify OUTPATH values

2012-05-26 Thread Francois Tigeot
Hey Michael, On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 12:15:51PM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 12:59 +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote: The attached patch reduces OUTPATH to two possible values: unx and wnt. Since it is potentially intrusive, I prefer to show it here for review instead

Re: [PATCH] Unify OUTPATH values

2012-05-29 Thread Francois Tigeot
Hi, On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 09:07:06PM +0200, Eike Rathke wrote: On Saturday, 2012-05-26 12:59:32 +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote: The attached patch reduces OUTPATH to two possible values: unx and wnt. In addition to what others already said regarding cross-platform builds

Re: minutes of ESC call ...

2012-04-19 Thread Francois Tigeot
like to know a bit more about this item; Norbert, would you prefer real boxes if possible ? -- Francois Tigeot ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

2012-04-21 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 09:09:34AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Francois Tigeot ftig...@wolfpond.org wrote: On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 04:11:18PM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: * tinderboxen / status (Norbert)       + bytemark machine #2

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

2012-04-22 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 03:02:45PM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Francois Tigeot ftig...@wolfpond.org wrote: If boxes are finally set up, they will be DragonFly + pkgsrc packages only, special software will have to be maintained by the developers themselves

Blanket license statement

2012-05-03 Thread Francois Tigeot
All of my past contributions to LibreOffice are licensed under the MPL/LGPLv3+ dual license; subsequent ones may also be licensed as MPL/LGPLv3+ unless stated otherwise. -- Francois Tigeot ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org

Beware of Boost-1.50

2012-08-15 Thread Francois Tigeot
versions gives perfectly fine binaries. The platform used was DragonFly/x86_64 but I have no reason to believe other *nix systems would fare differently. -- Francois Tigeot ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http

Re: Beware of Boost-1.50

2012-08-15 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:16:06AM -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote: On 08/15/2012 11:08 AM, Francois Tigeot wrote: The error I got is: libsclo.so: Undefined symbol _ZN5boost6system16generic_categoryEv I think David Tardon has already fixed this. Ah, it seems this was not directly a libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] linux.mk and ppc, arm, etc and gmake build

2011-03-24 Thread Francois Tigeot
. Looks good to me. Howewer, I'd prefer to have only one dragonfly.mk file. No need to have two files with tens of identical lines and only one or two different ones. You can just delete the -INTEL file and rename the other one, I'm not trying to build on i386 for now. -- Francois Tigeot

[Libreoffice] localize.cxx tries to run 'java' unconditionally

2011-03-26 Thread Francois Tigeot
module shed some light on this ? I'm pretty sure this hard-coded call to a 'java' executable is a bug but I don't know enough about the implications to disable it yet. -- Francois Tigeot ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http

Re: [Libreoffice] Removing jpropex

2011-03-26 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 05:41:20PM +0100, Andras Timar wrote: 2011/3/26 Francois Tigeot ftig...@wolfpond.org: Shouldn't l10ntools/java/jpropex be removed then ? Or the whole l10ntoos/java directory while we're at it ? Good question. java/l10nconv and java/receditor are not even build

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH] Fix curl location in download script

2011-04-03 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:27:16AM +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote: On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 07:50:06AM +0200, Francois Tigeot ftig...@wolfpond.org wrote: curl is required at the autogen.sh stage: if I try to run ./autogen.sh without any curl package installed, I get this error: configure

[Libreoffice] ld dynamic linker hash style

2011-04-04 Thread Francois Tigeot
generates both old and new-style sections, keeping all binutils happy. The attached patch does just that. -- Francois Tigeot diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in index 50ea5e1..4882e09 100755 --- a/configure.in +++ b/configure.in @@ -958,7 +958,7 @@ WITH_SYSTEM_MOZILLA=no) AC_ARG_WITH(linker

Re: [Libreoffice] ld dynamic linker hash style

2011-04-05 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 11:40:57AM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: Francois Tigeot píše v Po 04. 04. 2011 v 22:51 +0200: During the last few days, my builds have been broken with this error message: makedepend: Shared object has no run-time symbol table I have tracked the start of my

Re: [Libreoffice] ld dynamic linker hash style

2011-04-05 Thread Francois Tigeot
Hi Michael, On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 11:53:55AM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 22:51 +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote: During the last few days, my builds have been broken with this error message: makedepend: Shared object has no run-time symbol table Oh

  1   2   3   >