[Libreoffice] small utility script to handle ../bin/g and similar commands

2010-10-08 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
I found myself weary of typing ./ or ../ or ../../ etc to get to ./bin/g an immediate solution is to make an alias with the full path alias g='/home/me/git/oo/build/bin/g' but that imply that you have only one git clone... and I have 2 (one to work in, the other one to build pristine git pull

Re: [Libreoffice] sending patches question

2010-10-10 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 2:34 AM, Prashant Shah pshah.mum...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, What is the best way to send patches to this mailing list. The patches I send are getting converted in to binary attachments. Attachments are fine. They are accepted on this list. Regards.

Re: [Libreoffice] [Pushed] [PATCH 01-11/11] Cleanup: remove bogus comments

2010-10-10 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 4:08 AM, Prashant Shah pshah.mum...@gmail.com wrote: This patch removes bogus comments found in the label1.cxx file All 11 patchs are pushed. Thanks. Signed-off-by: Prashant Shah pshah.mum...@gmail.com ---  sw/source/ui/envelp/label1.cxx |  121

Re: [Libreoffice] [Pushed (all 53 of them)] [PATCH 18/18] Cleanup: remove bogus comments from flddok.cxx

2010-10-10 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Prashant Shah pshah.mum...@gmail.com wrote: This patch removes bogus comments found in the flddok.cxx file including empty Beschreibung (translation: description) statements Thanks Prashant, Pushed them all. Can you try to combine some of them if a bigger

Re: [Libreoffice] small utility script to handle ../bin/g and similar commands

2010-10-10 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Miklos Vajna vmik...@frugalware.org wrote: On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 11:00:55AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:  The problem is that if you are in rootgit/rawbuild/vcl/source for example  git-rev-parse with give you ../../  the same result

[Libreoffice] merged vosremoval-diagnose.diff, vosremoval-timer.diif and voremoval-socket.diff

2010-10-10 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
Hi all, I merged vosremoval-diagnose.diff, vosremoval-timer.diif and voremoval-socket.diff Norbert ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] Cleanup: remove bogus comments

2010-10-11 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 4:48 AM, Noel Power nopo...@novell.com wrote: Hi Ruben, Thanks for hacking LibreOffice and thanks for the patch, it's mostly committed, On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 13:10 +0200, Rubén Jáñez wrote: This patch removes bogus comments found in Base. just be careful of removing

[Libreoffice] Wiki developper page

2010-10-11 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
Ok so I don't have a blog... but We have a brand new wiki... So I started a page, intended to help prospective developper to get acquainted with the build and with git... This is quite fresh in my mind... since I've learn that in the past few days. But I may be wrong, so a reviewed by more

Re: [Libreoffice] Improving the build experience in rawbuild

2010-10-13 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Cedric Bosdonnat cedric.bosdonnat@free.fr wrote: Hi fellow developers, We improved our build process a lot since the LibreOffice creation, but there is still something I'ld like to improve. Developers should build in rawbuild in order to create patches (or

Re: [Libreoffice] running 'build' ...

2010-10-14 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 4:19 AM, Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com wrote: Hi Thomas, On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 08:37 +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote: Where is the build executable I'm supposed to run when a build is interrupted ?        Ah - good point :-) I'll update the build script to

Re: [Libreoffice] [For Review] mer of most vos-removal patches left. and little related houskeeping

2010-10-18 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 4:53 AM, Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com wrote: On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 15:21 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: I've pushed the branch 'feature/vos-removal' for review I have rebased against master Saturday morning GMT, with relatively few conflict. The resulting build

Re: [Libreoffice] Building on gentoo ...

2010-10-18 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Anthony Youngman anth...@youngman.org.uk wrote:  Just tried to build libreoffice on gentoo. All the pre-requisites should be there, given that I've done an emerge openoffice. But it falls over ... checking for Qt headers... no configure: error: Qt headers not

Re: [Libreoffice] Building on gentoo ...

2010-10-19 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Wols Lists antli...@youngman.org.uk wrote:  On 19/10/10 20:15, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Wols Lists antli...@youngman.org.uk wrote:  On 19/10/10 19:57, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Anthony Youngman

Re: [Libreoffice] [LibreOffice] [Pushed][PATCH] Minor libs-core comment clean up.

2010-10-19 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Trevor Murphy trevor.m.mur...@gmail.com wrote: Hello. I'm pretty new to this open source game, but I've been lurking a bit and want to learn more. I took a stab at fixing some comments in the libs-core repo. Thanks Trevor. Your patch has been pushed into the

Re: [Libreoffice] [Pushed][PATCH] Filters - Clean up comments in sw_unocoll.cxx

2010-10-19 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 6:18 PM, jgraeme jgraeme+li...@gmail.com wrote: A patch to clean up comments. Pushed, Thanks Norbert Graeme ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org

Re: [Libreoffice] [Pushed][PATCH] Filters - Clean up comments in sw_unoframe.cxx

2010-10-19 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 6:27 PM, jgraeme jgraeme+li...@gmail.com wrote: Another patch cleaning up comments. Pushed, Thanks, Norbert Graeme ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org

[Libreoffice] vos removal: looking for windows and MacOS build-tester

2010-10-21 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
Hi, I've pushed an updated version of the feature/vos-removal branch At this point vos is no more, and I build and 'smoketest' successfully in rawbuild on Linux x86_64 I'm looking for volonteer to build it and to basic test on it on other platforms. (note Linux welcome too, it won't hurt to

Re: [Libreoffice] BOOL redefinition problem

2010-10-22 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Thomas Klausner w...@netbsd.org wrote: Hi! Entering /disk/2/archive/libreoffice/build/libreoffice-3.2.99.2/connectivity/source/drivers/adabas Compiling: connectivity/unxbsdx3.pro/misc/adabas_dflt_version.c Compiling:

Re: [Libreoffice] vos removal: looking for windows and MacOS build-tester

2010-10-22 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
, emerged -C rpm, and re-emerged the 'stable' rpm... and that seems to have 'solved' it. Norbert On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 7:07 PM, Wols Lists antli...@youngman.org.uk wrote:  On 23/10/10 00:55, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Wols Lists antli...@youngman.org.uk wrote:  On 22

Re: [Libreoffice] vos removal: looking for windows and MacOS build-tester

2010-10-22 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:09 PM, Santiago Bosio santiago.bo...@gmail.com wrote:  El 21/10/10 21:11, Norbert Thiebaud escribió: ... git checkout -b vos origin/feature/vos-removal  ./bin/g checkout -b vos origin/feature/vos-removal I'm trying to build on Fedora 13 (32bit). Thanks.. It's

Re: [Libreoffice] Memory leak in ./build/libreoffice-3.2.99.2/libxml2/unxlngi6.pro/misc/build/libxml2-2.7.6/xmlmemory.c

2010-10-24 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 7:55 AM, julien serval2...@yahoo.fr wrote: Hi, I keep on with cppcheck and i found 3 functions in the this file with a call to malloc without call to free : xmlMallocLoc and xmlMallocAtomicLoc and xmlMemStrdupLoc By the name of it, I would expect these function to do

Re: [Libreoffice] PATCH - change default KDE from 3 to 4

2010-10-25 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com wrote: Hi Wols, On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 23:29 +0100, Wols Lists wrote: This patch (in the top level build dir) makes the development system compile with KDE4 switched on and KDE3 switched off.        That sounds

Re: [Libreoffice] smoketest segfault

2010-10-25 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com wrote: On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 22:03 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: I have a segfault running smoketest. Its cold comfort, but smoketest works for me ok. can you post the ./bin/g log of where you are at (and mybe your autogen

[Libreoffice] commit bootstrap:abb03ac2ac85c67167d17277fefa8309a99f1100 break the build

2010-10-25 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
commit bootstrap:abb03ac2ac85c67167d17277fefa8309a99f1100 break the build for me in instsetoo_native. = Building module instsetoo_native = Entering /lo/ref/rawbuild/instsetoo_native/inc_openoffice/unix Entering

Re: [Libreoffice] Bug when compiling unoguard.obj

2010-10-26 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 3:29 PM, julien serval2...@yahoo.fr wrote: Hello, Here what i get : Compiling: sc/source/ui/unoobj/detreg.cxx Making:    unoobj.lib Compiling: sc/source/ui/unoobj/unoguard.cxx

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Cleaning and organizing of configure.in

2010-10-26 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Kevin Hunter hunt...@earlham.edu wrote: At 6:18pm -0400 Tue, 26 Oct 2010, Christian Lohmaier wrote: I personally disagree that an alphabetically sortet list is best. e.g. now the font inclusion options wrt dejavu and liberation fonts are spread apart, build

Re: [Libreoffice] smoketest segfault

2010-10-27 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 4:39 AM, Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 15:39 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com wrote: On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 22:03 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: I have a segfault

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix for bug / feature request 30550 - Character count without spaces

2010-10-27 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On 10/27/10, Mattias Johnsson m.t.johns...@gmail.com wrote: On 28 October 2010 08:42, LeMoyne j...@mail2lee.com wrote: All these tests are with the aScanner.GetLen() 1 check in place. With that Len =2 check, the new counting routine has no problem with single letter words like A, a,

Re: [Libreoffice] [Pushed] Mac OS9 Cleanup

2010-10-28 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Joseph Powers jpower...@cox.net wrote: Since we don't support OS9 builds, why do we have so much OS9 build code? The following patches will remove most (I'd like to say all, but the monument I do someone will point out some more) OS 9 code and build support.

Re: [Libreoffice] [Pushed] Same patches as attachment

2010-10-29 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 1:36 AM, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote: As Norbert Thiebaud has an email client that does not allow him to nicely apply patches sent with git send-email ;-P, here the same 4 patches as attachments. Pushed, Thanks Norbert Thanks for applying. Sebastian

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH][Pushed] emacs.el: Replace all mentions of OOo with LO

2010-11-01 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 5:35 AM, Tim Retout t...@retout.co.uk wrote: Hello, world! This is a naive replacement of OpenOffice.org with LibreOffice in emacs.el in the build repository. Thanks Tim, Pushed. Will patches sent with git send-email be accepted? I speak only for myself, but due

Re: [Libreoffice] suspect code in extentions/sdext/source/presenter/PresenterClock.cxx

2010-11-01 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 6:05 AM, Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 10:54 +0100, David Tardon wrote: Yes, but the situation here is different. The Paint method is actually defined in the same class and has nothing in common with VCL's Window::Paint. The actual

Re: [Libreoffice] --enable-automagic

2010-11-02 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Wols Lists antli...@youngman.org.uk wrote: On 02/11/10 12:34, Rene Engelhard wrote: On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 09:10:23AM +, Wols Lists wrote: In particular, there's a page on the gentoo wiki (I've put a pointer to it in our development wiki) that says that

Re: [Libreoffice] Question about Git

2010-11-04 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 6:09 PM, julien serval2...@yahoo.fr wrote: Hello, I've made changes on my repository and now when i type : bin/g pull -r i've got : extensions/source/activex/main/SOActionsApproval.cpp: needs update extensions/source/activex/main/SOComWindowPeer.cpp: needs update

[Libreoffice] smoketest

2010-11-06 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
There is some improvement on the smoketest front It run pass many more tests.. but still do not finish: dir -p ./unxlngx6.pro/misc/smoketest/user :

Re: [Libreoffice] High-Contrast Cleanup

2010-11-06 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
Pushed, Thanks Norbert On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 9:06 PM, Joseph Powers jpower...@cox.net wrote: Man, you forget to delete two lines of code and someone complains... Sorry about that, (julien, I hope this makes you happy). Joe P. diff --git a/svx/source/tbxctrls/fontworkgallery.cxx

Re: [Libreoffice] Questions about ./sdext/source/minimizer/unodialog.cxx

2010-11-07 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 7:00 AM, julien serval2...@yahoo.fr wrote: Hello, I'm currently running a cppcheck on the clone directory (i had try to launch cppcheck on the build/libreoffice... but it seemed it freezed). I've seen this issue :

Re: [Libreoffice] Build on Ubuntu 10.10 fails with 'missing image.hxx'

2010-11-07 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Fred Jendrzejewki fred.jendrzejew...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I try to build on Ubuntu 10.10 amd64 the master branch. Then I get the following error message: build -- version: 275224 = Building module canvas = ... dmake:  

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH][Pushed] one last patch for base/dbaccess/core/api

2010-11-07 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Wols Lists antli...@youngman.org.uk wrote: Just deleting a bit of commented out code - that's dbaccess/source/core/api pretty much done. Pushed, thanks. Norbert Cheers, Wol ___ LibreOffice mailing list

Re: [Libreoffice] cppcheck : snprintf size is out of bounds

2010-11-12 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Nov 12, 2010, at 3:44, Julien jnabet2...@free.fr wrote: Hello, I'm currently running the last version of cppcheck (i updated with git this morning) and i get this error : snprintf size is out of bounds ex: [./libs-gui/vcl/unx/source/printergfx/common_gfx.cxx:542]: (error) snprintf

Re: [Libreoffice] cppcheck : snprintf size is out of bounds

2010-11-12 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Nov 12, 2010, at 7:16, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote: On Nov 12, 2010, at 3:44, Julien jnabet2...@free.fr wrote: Hello, I'm currently running the last version of cppcheck (i updated with git this morning) and i get this error : snprintf size is out of bounds ex

Re: [Libreoffice] HC Error

2010-11-17 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Nov 17, 2010, at 18:14, Joseph Powers jpower...@cox.net wrote: Your patch looks good. Sorry about that; now I'm wondering why it built for me... Because on MacOS you probably don't buid gtk related stuff ? Norbert Joe P. Message: 6 Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 20:58:20 +0100 From:

Re: [Libreoffice] newish to git: howto recover from bad merge?

2010-11-19 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Nov 19, 2010, at 0:11, Kevin Hunter hunt...@earlham.edu wrote: Hullo List, It must be something simple, but I'm having a devil of a time recovering from a bad merge. Given my transcript below, how do I recover? It usually happens after I've committed a change to my local

Re: [Libreoffice] feature/rip-build-repo - branch for removal of the need of the 'build' repo

2010-11-20 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Jan Holesovsky ke...@suse.cz wrote: Hi, In case you are interested to try to build without the 'build' repo (the rawbuild/ way), you can try to get the feature/rip-build-repo branch which I hope is going to become the 'official' way of building soon ;-) btw,

Re: [Libreoffice] feature/rip-build-repo - branch for removal of the need of the 'build' repo

2010-11-21 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
kendy, here are the patches I have so far on the rip-build-repo branch 0001: the sed to remove bootstrap from the git url and replace it by one of the other repos name didn't work on MacOS... I was too lazy to figure-out why, so I used bash varaible substitution instead :-) 0002: the ./dowmload

Re: [Libreoffice] Fwd: [PATCH] RTL_CONSTASCII_USTRINGPARAM for libs-core/vbahelper

2010-11-21 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On 11/21/10, Julien Nabet serval2...@yahoo.fr wrote: Sorry, I just noticed that git diff even on a subdirectory didn't make a diff only on this subdirectory. For example : i made a git diff in clone/libs-core/vbahelper/source but the diff includes the changes i made in

Re: [Libreoffice] [patch] binfilter: cleanup and compilation warnings removal.

2010-11-22 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
2010/11/22 Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com: Hi Joachim, On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 13:59 +0100, Joachim Trémouroux wrote: I have fixed some compilation warnings in binfilter and some unnecessary comments. Patch is attached for review.        Hokay - the binfilter is of course un-loved and

Re: [Libreoffice] feature/rip-build-repo - branch for removal of the need of the 'build' repo

2010-11-22 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Kohei Yoshida kyosh...@novell.com wrote: On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 18:40 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Jan Holesovsky ke...@suse.cz wrote: Hi, In case you are interested to try to build without the 'build' repo (the rawbuild

[Libreoffice] Fwd: [patch] binfilter: cleanup and compilation warnings removal.

2010-11-23 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
oops, forgot to reply-all -- Forwarded message -- From: Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com Date: 2010/11/23 Subject: Re: [Libreoffice] [patch] binfilter: cleanup and compilation warnings removal. To: Pierre-André Jacquod pjacq...@alumni.ethz.ch 2010/11/23 Pierre-André Jacquod

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] improve style according to cppcheck

2010-11-27 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Christian Lohmaier lohmaier+libreoff...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi *, On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Takeshi Abe t...@fixedpoint.jp wrote: [cppcheck patches] I'm curious: Why does cppcheck complain about for i++ and suggests/demands pre-increment

[Libreoffice] Attention: New build structure is coming!

2010-11-29 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
This is a heads-up about a change in the way we build the product that is about to be pushed. Current Situation = Right know there are 2 main way to build the product. Both of them rely on pulling the 'build' repo and using ./download in that repo to pull the 19 others git repos.

[Libreoffice] Attention: The changes to the build system are about to be pushed....

2010-11-30 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
in the next few minutes ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice] Important: for your next pull do ./bin/g pull -r BEFORE git pull -r

2010-11-30 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
Important: for your next pull do ./bin/g pull -r BEFORE git pull -r ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] Important: for your next pull do ./bin/g pull -r BEFORE git pull -r

2010-11-30 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
Pushed, thanks Norbert On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Takeshi Abe t...@fixedpoint.jp wrote: Hi, On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:02:05 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote: Important: for your next pull do ./bin/g pull -r BEFORE git pull -r Could you apply the attached patch

Re: [Libreoffice] Attention: The changes to the build system are about to be pushed....

2010-12-01 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com wrote: Hi there, On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 20:26 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: in the next few minutes        So - a quick reminder, the new wiki page is at:        http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development

Re: [Libreoffice] defaulting to --without-java ... (?)

2010-12-02 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 16:33 +, Michael Meeks wrote: So,       As part of the quest to make LibreOffice easier to build; and in parallel to annoy developers who are missing those java implemented features into

Re: [Libreoffice] Java build problem identified?

2010-12-04 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Wols Lists antli...@youngman.org.uk wrote: Dunno how to fix it, but I think I've found out what's wrong with my build ... the following is output from autogen checking whether to build with Java support... yes checking for java... /usr/bin/java checking the

Re: [Libreoffice] bad value (atom) for -mtune= switch on boostrap build

2010-12-04 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Takeshi Abe t...@fixedpoint.jp wrote: Hi Norbert, On Sat, 4 Dec 2010 16:18:38 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Takeshi Abe t...@fixedpoint.jp wrote: Hi, In recent bootstrap build I got an error as follows

Re: [Libreoffice] bad value (atom) for -mtune= switch on boostrap build

2010-12-04 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Takeshi Abe t...@fixedpoint.jp wrote: Hi Norbert, On Sat, 4 Dec 2010 16:18:38 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Takeshi Abe t...@fixedpoint.jp wrote: Hi, In recent bootstrap build I got an error as follows

Re: [Libreoffice] [Pushed 01-16] [PATCH 01/16] warning variable unused fix in binfilter bf_sw attr

2010-12-05 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
2010/12/5 Pierre-André Jacquod pjacq...@alumni.ethz.ch: Hi, here some patches to suppress warnings within binfilter. I took a - sometimes too - conservative approach for doing this. Hope I did not harm this module regards Thnaks, I pushed the whole series... Norbert

Re: [Libreoffice] new bootstrap: quick stop

2010-12-05 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Thomas Klausner w...@netbsd.org wrote: I found the simplest fix for it: diff --git a/Makefile.in b/Makefile.in index 9e05c70..4fbbf4a 100644 --- a/Makefile.in +++ b/Makefile.in @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@  # @configure_input@  # FIXME: create 'install' and 'check'

Re: [Libreoffice] Java build problem identified | findhome | MacOSX location ?

2010-12-05 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 9:39 PM, Thorsten Behrens t...@documentfoundation.org wrote: Caolan McNamara wrote: IIRC I tried this before, and there was some cockup under MacOSX, so if someone on MacOSX could see what findhome says and if its correct/wrong vs what works correctly there, that'd be

Re: [Libreoffice] Remove __FAR_DATA [PATCH]

2010-12-05 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
Michael, under which name do you want this to be commited ? ( --author=Michael calla...@xmission.com ) Norbert On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 5:53 PM, calla...@xmission.com wrote: Here are patches to the various git repositories to remove the empty __FAR_DATA macro from solar.h.  Changes are

Re: [Libreoffice] Java build problem identified | findhome | MacOSX location ?

2010-12-06 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 6:53 AM, Christian Lohmaier lohma...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi Norbert, *, On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 9:39 PM, Thorsten Behrens t...@documentfoundation.org wrote: Caolan McNamara wrote: IIRC I

Re: [Libreoffice] Java build problem identified | findhome | MacOSX location ?

2010-12-06 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
Ok, I pushed a new version that should be doing 'The Right thing(tm)' on MacOS It is still doing the readlink stuf on other platforms... Norbert On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 7:21 AM, Wols Lists antli...@youngman.org.uk wrote: On 06/12/10 12:57, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: Hmm - but the result

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Use GtkStatusIcon instead of libegg

2010-12-06 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Christopher Backhouse cjbackho...@gmail.com wrote: ... Chris PS - is there a git commit notification list I can subscribe to? The git web interface is a royal pain to navigate. http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits

Re: [Libreoffice] Patch review for Bug 32196 requested

2010-12-07 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Kohei Yoshida kyosh...@novell.com wrote: I've attached a patch awaiting peer-review. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32196 The change is simple and innocuous enough that I would almost commit it without review, but I'd like someone to take a quick

Re: [Libreoffice] Patch review for Bug 32196 requested

2010-12-07 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Kohei Yoshida kyosh...@novell.com wrote: Hi Norbert, On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 17:03 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Kohei Yoshida kyosh...@novell.com wrote: I've attached a patch awaiting peer-review. https

Re: [Libreoffice] Patch review for Bug 32196 requested

2010-12-07 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Kohei Yoshida kyosh...@novell.com wrote: On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 21:38 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Kohei Yoshida kyosh...@novell.com wrote: Hi Norbert, On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 17:03 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: On Tue, Dec

Re: [Libreoffice] Easter eggs, was: Re: Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Olivier Hallot olivier.hal...@documentfoundation.org wrote: While we are here, I am happy to know we will one day remove our LO easter eggs. Are 'we' ? No matter how inocuous they are (and they are), it is too often a source of noise in enterprise

Re: [Libreoffice] Easter eggs, was: Re: Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Marc Paré m...@marcpare.com wrote: Le 2010-12-08 12:00, Olivier Hallot a écrit : The no  ise I had to fight in a 120.000 desktop deployment I am managing, by the IT security dept who almost made me write under oath that these stupidities are

Re: [Libreoffice] Easter eggs, was: Re: Comments on RC1

2010-12-08 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Alexander Thurgood alex.thurg...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Norbert, Le 08/12/10 15:41, Norbert Thiebaud a écrit : Seriously ? What kind of noise ? (I hate to imagine the kind of work environment where the mere existence of such eggs would be cause for any concern

Re: [Libreoffice] help.libreoffice.org MediaWiki DB snapshot to play with?

2010-12-08 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:30 PM, some...@boldandbusted.com wrote: Hi, all. I read part of the thread LibreOffice WikiHelp and recognized that there are a large body of MediaWiki Extensions that might help. However, rather than ask to try it out on your systems, I'd like to try them on my own,

Re: [Libreoffice] BOOL conflict

2010-12-09 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 1:50 AM, Thomas Klausner w...@netbsd.org wrote: On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 10:49:27AM +, Michael Meeks wrote:       Urk; another reason not to use BOOL I guess :-)       What does your iodbcunix.h include ? I guess we might need to do some hideous #define magic for the

Re: [Libreoffice] Removal of DECLARE_LIST() from Calc

2010-12-09 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:55 AM, Joseph Powers jpower...@cox.net wrote: I'm converting ScRangeList from DECLARE_LIST( ScRangeListBase, ScRange* ) to ::STD::vector ScRange* ScRangeListBase The most of the code boring and unlikely to cause issues; however, some areas need further review:

Re: [Libreoffice] Build on MacOSX : Requirement for hunspell

2010-12-10 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 5:24 AM, Christian Lohmaier lohmaier+libreoff...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi Alexander, *, On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Alexander Thurgood alex.thurg...@gmail.com wrote: I just wanted to touch base with others here as to the requirement for hunspell in the build

Re: [Libreoffice] Error compilation in vcl module

2010-12-16 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
Julien make sure you have pulled libs-gui:7758d868da6c4d6f489300bfb517ab3bb7a6dce9 Norbert On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Julien Nabet serval2...@yahoo.fr wrote: Hello, Here the error I get when I compile vcl (i removed unxlng but same result) : Entering

Re: [Libreoffice] Error compilation in vcl module

2010-12-16 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
. (I have had issue with environment variables getting fked-up) Norbert Julien. Le 16/12/2010 23:39, Norbert Thiebaud a écrit : Julien make sure you have pulled libs-gui:7758d868da6c4d6f489300bfb517ab3bb7a6dce9 Norbert On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Julien Nabetserval2...@yahoo.fr

Re: [Libreoffice] [Patch] call-catcher / bloat removal in sc module part1

2010-12-17 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Julien Nabet serval2...@yahoo.fr wrote: Hello, Remove call-catcher / bloat removal with sc module Compiling sc was ok. The .bz2 format means one more obstacle to reviewing it. Norbert Julien (LGPLv3+ / MPL)

Re: [Libreoffice] Gerrit migration

2011-10-20 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote: @Norbert: I put your on the tinderboxes action item with a question mark, as we need your advice for that anyway. It is not your action item, unless you want commit yourself it. ;) no problem... but

Re: [Libreoffice] make experts: progress information?

2011-10-20 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 02:25:33PM +0200, Jan Holesovsky wrote: So I think we could do it even without patching gnumake ;-)  I'd just increment a global variable in in every gb_LinkTarget_add_*

Re: [Libreoffice] Segmentation fault in building tail_build project

2011-10-23 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 2:57 AM, LOH KOK HOE huahsi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I have just downloaded the latest source code from GIT, following the developer guideline in making the build. But it failed in tail_build project. When attempting the individual build on tail_build project, I get

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH]: Translate German Comments

2011-10-27 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Philipp Weissenbacher p.weissenbac...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Here is my first patch. It translates the German comments found in sw/source/core/doc/acmplwrd.cxx to English. I also translated messages within OSL_ENSURE; wasn't sure if that's permissible.

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH]: Translate German Comments

2011-10-27 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Philipp Weissenbacher p.weissenbac...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Here is my first patch. It translates the German comments found in sw/source/core/doc/acmplwrd.cxx to English. I also

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH]: Translate German Comments

2011-10-28 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Philipp Weissenbacher p.weissenbac...@gmail.com wrote: I didn't get any such message. Also, searching in vim for /\s\+$ turned up only one trailing space on line 291. I used gedit; maybe that's the culprit? yes that was it. for gedit, google pointed me to:

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH]: Translate German Comments

2011-10-28 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Philipp Weissenbacher p.weissenbac...@gmail.com wrote: ls -l .git/hooks -rwxrwxr-x. 1 philipp philipp  452 Oct 21 03:00 applypatch-msg.sample -rwxrwxr-x. 1 philipp philipp  896 Oct 21 03:00 commit-msg.sample -rwxrwxr-x. 1 philipp philipp  160 Oct 21 03:00

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH]: Translate German Comments

2011-10-28 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Philipp Weissenbacher p.weissenbac...@gmail.com wrote: Out of curiosity, how did you set-up your repos ? (pure git clone, using the tar.gz primer method ? ) I used git clone git://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/core/ And then followed the patch handling

Re: [Libreoffice] Segmentation fault in building tail_build project

2011-10-29 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 6:13 AM, Christian Lohmaier lohmaier+libreoff...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi *, On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 11:16 AM, LOH KOK HOE huahsi...@gmail.com wrote: May I know is there a way to use the make 3.82 and not removing make 3.81? export GNUMAKE=/path/to/make-3.82 or

Re: [Libreoffice] about daily builds

2011-11-02 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 7:08 AM, Jean-Baptiste Faure jbf.fa...@orange.fr wrote: Hi all, I think it should be interesting to have in the directory of each daily build a text file giving two informations : 1/ the top commit against which this daily build has been built 2/ the list of autogen.sh

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Translate more German comments

2011-11-04 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Philipp Weissenbacher p.weissenbac...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I've translated more German comments in sw/source/core/doc/. Lovely, thanks. I've tweak a couple of intentations issue, but otherwise: Pushed. Can you please add [PATCH] in the title of yours

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] libo_git_from_tar.sh cleanup

2011-11-05 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Korrawit Pruegsanusak detective.conan.1...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Norbert, all, I've used your libo_git_from_tar.sh in libreoffice/contrib/dev-tools and found some nitpicking. Patch attached, under GPLv3. Also, it would be good if you'll upload this new

Re: [Libreoffice] Build failure on RHEL5.4 in module tail_build

2011-11-06 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
2011/11/6 xuanyong.yang xuanyong.y...@qq.com: Hello! I got the following error. Any ideas? and I didn't make any changes in the code, just trying to build the master. you should have a file called build_error.log, it should contain the output of the failed module... take a look in there to

Re: [Libreoffice] building a fast Windows build machine

2011-11-07 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Noel Grandin n...@peralex.com wrote: Hi Some of the initial phases of the build are disk-bound, but the build spends most of it's time completely CPU bound. All 6 cores are completely maxed out. It's completely dominated by the Visual Studio compile times, so

Re: [Libreoffice] building a fast Windows build machine

2011-11-07 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Noel Grandin n...@peralex.com wrote: Hi Some of the initial phases of the build are disk-bound, but the build spends most of it's time completely CPU bound. All 6 cores are completely

Re: [Libreoffice] [RFC] make binfilter depend on tail_build

2011-11-10 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
Sorry, that came in during LO-Conf and I somehow missed it. On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Peter Foley pefol...@verizon.net wrote: Hi, I'd like to propose making binfilter depend on tail_build. Because binfilter is legacy code and it's 11316 lines worth of dmake makefiles are highly

Re: [Libreoffice] minutes of tech. steering call ...

2011-11-10 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Michael Meeks michael.me...@suse.com wrote: * Make binfilter depend on tail_build        + not a big issue, will happen as/when needed or someone wants that.        + other modules prevent that currently; cf. 'extensions' Errata: other module are on the

Re: [Libreoffice] translating german - english

2011-11-12 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Ivan Timofeev timofeev@gmail.com wrote: 2011/11/7 Michael Meeks michael.me...@suse.com: On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 11:57 +0100, Luc Castermans wrote: The last thing: I found patch making  instructions on the Libo site. If there are better ones, I like to receive

Re: [Libreoffice] about daily builds

2011-11-12 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 7:08 AM, Jean-Baptiste Faure jbf.fa...@orange.fr wrote: Hi all, I think it should be interesting to have in the directory of each daily build a text file giving two informations : 1/ the top commit against which this daily build has been built 2/ the list of autogen.sh

Re: [Libreoffice] write access to http://dev-www.libreoffice.org/

2011-11-13 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Lionel Elie Mamane lio...@mamane.lu wrote: On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 02:41:02AM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: I have in my local working dir an upgrade of the bundled mysqlcppconn to latest officially stable version; it was my first shot at fdo#42865. The way

Re: [Libreoffice] write access to http://dev-www.libreoffice.org/

2011-11-13 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Lionel Elie Mamane lio...@mamane.lu wrote: http://dev.mysql.com/downloads/mirror.php?id=393795#mirrors Please rename it to 0981bda6548a8c8233ffce2b6e4b2a23-mysql-connector-cpp.tar.gz Done Norbert ___ LibreOffice

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >