Re: [Libreoffice] (no subject)
What's up! wow i just found this.. i just won my iPad2 for nothing, thats right nothing.. you need to hurry up and get yours before it to late heres the website.. http://so.ee/K50 code 39588976/HTML ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] (no subject)
How are you. I was messing around on the net and found this!! want a NFL Jersey you can pick any team there only giving out!! 84 NFL Jerseys! hurry up and get yours!! heres the link my friend.. http://sayabit.com/dbayoh/HTML ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] (no subject)
Hi Thorsten, On Saturday, 2011-09-03 18:31:57 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote: Can we do something against letting all those .exe .scr .zip etc. attachments pass through? Yep, just adapted the setup accordingly. Note that the surrounding messages will still be delivered (that might annoy people who've previously had downstream filters for exactly those attachments). As me.. Oh, .zip is still permitted - no strong opinion on that one, though. Do we need really .zip? Btw, that seems to be a negative list, disallowing specified extensions, there are umpteen extensions Windows regards as executable.. wouldn't it be better to have a positive list instead? Eike -- PGP/OpenPGP/GnuPG encrypted mail preferred in all private communication. Key ID: 0x293C05FD - 997A 4C60 CE41 0149 0DB3 9E96 2F1A D073 293C 05FD signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] (no subject)
Eike Rathke wrote: Can we do something against letting all those .exe .scr .zip etc. attachments pass through? Yep, just adapted the setup accordingly. Note that the surrounding messages will still be delivered (that might annoy people who've previously had downstream filters for exactly those attachments). Oh, .zip is still permitted - no strong opinion on that one, though. Cheers, -- Thorsten pgp2HaJHOhd5i.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] (no subject)
Hi, On Wednesday, 2011-08-31 01:02:51 -0500, chars...@apple.com wrote: [... bla making it look like coming from a mailer-daemon ...] and [-- Attachment #2: document.exe --] [-- Type: application/octet-stream, Encoding: base64, Size: 29K --] Can we do something against letting all those .exe .scr .zip etc. attachments pass through? Eike -- PGP/OpenPGP/GnuPG encrypted mail preferred in all private communication. Key ID: 0x293C05FD - 997A 4C60 CE41 0149 0DB3 9E96 2F1A D073 293C 05FD signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] (no subject)
Hi Eike, On 2011-09-01 at 12:18 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote: Can we do something against letting all those .exe .scr .zip etc. attachments pass through? I'd say bug against the fd.o infa... Regards, Kendy ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] (no subject)
Le 22/08/11 12:44, Alexander Thurgood a écrit : Please ignore this particular message, which has appeared elsewhere already, just Gmane and/or Thunderbird doing some strange things to my reply to list button. Caolan has already suggested something on this elsewhere. Alex ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] (no subject)
Hello Antoine, Thanks for your patch. I just pushed it. Feel free to provide other patches like this one. BTW, you didn't mention anything, I supposed you were agreeing to provide the patch under LGPLv3+ / MPL... is that OK? Regards, -- Cédric Bosdonnat LibreOffice hacker http://documentfoundation.org OOo Eclipse Integration developer http://cedric.bosdonnat.free.fr ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] (no subject)
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 15:51 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: Summary, is that we lost 34,000 lines of code since we started to code on LO... Howdy Sebastian, Outstanding - this is a figure we are confident enough in to publish? Sounds like it, but just to be sure..so, this is how I put it out via twitter. == #libreoffice developers put the #openoffice code on a diet / work-out regiment. After 6 weeks how did they do? 34,000 Lines of code lighter. Best wishes, Drew ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] (no subject)
#libreoffice developers put the #openoffice code on a diet / work-out regiment. After 6 weeks how did they do? 34,000 Lines of code lighter. But isn't a lot of this lines of code that were commented out, or inside #if 0? And how much of the change is due to changes in the OOo milestones that have been merged in? I would be very careful in using that number in any kind of bragging fashion, without very explicitly indicating what it measures, exactly. Of course, hard to do that in a short tweet, and it is bound to be misinterpreted. --tml ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] (no subject)
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 09:04 -0700, Tor Lillqvist wrote: I would be very careful in using that number in any kind of bragging fashion, without very explicitly indicating what it measures, exactly. Of course, hard to do that in a short tweet, and it is bound to be misinterpreted. Right - I understand your concern. Laugh if you like but what I did was a quick read over the docs for the tool Sebastian used and felt pretty comfortable afterwards. Granted there are variables not mentioned, options, et al. But, did send that tweet out. IMO it wasn't a bragging tone, just promoting. If there is are questions folks will refer to the ML, already public anyway. At least that was my thought process. Best wishes, Drew ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] (no subject)
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:28:46 +, Michael Meeks wrote: Fun - so, of course, statistics without a robust interpretation can be rather dangerous :-) Right, and netto LOC is a pretty bad measure of productivity and effectiveness, even if things like COCOMO (?) models andwhatnot suggest otherwise. Most of the code loss is probably removing code that has been #ifdef 0 out, or similar. Still a fun trivia that one can ask the audience at a conference :). Sebastian pgpi4TtynrQ1E.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
