On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 12:52 AM, Korrawit Pruegsanusak
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 14:03, Fridrich Strba
> wrote:
>> On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 07:23 +0200, Herbert Duerr wrote:
>>> getting rid of the related UNO API would also be a good idea if there
>>> wasn't the "UNO API semper
Hello all,
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 14:03, Fridrich Strba
wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 07:23 +0200, Herbert Duerr wrote:
>> getting rid of the related UNO API would also be a good idea if there
>> wasn't the "UNO API semper fi" mantra.
>
> No such mantra in the LibreOffice world I guess :)
So so
Hello, Herbert,
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 07:23 +0200, Herbert Duerr wrote:
> getting rid of the related UNO API would also be a good idea if there
> wasn't the "UNO API semper fi" mantra.
No such mantra in the LibreOffice world I guess :)
F.
___
LibreO
Hi,
(a.nChar1 < b.nChar1) || ((a.nChar1 == a.nChar2) && (a.nChar2 <
b.nChar2))
? Somehow, that expression still looks suspicious. (At least, it does
not implement a lexicographical less-than relation. Not sure whether it
should or not, however.)
It should not indeed. On the other hand Output
Hello Eike, Stephan, *
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 17:23, Eike Rathke wrote:
> It didn't occur to me that the original expression
> actually would had been wrong at two places..
Also for me too. My bad for didn't notice it.
> On Thursday, 2011-09-08 08:40:24 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
>> Now act
Hi Stephan,
On Thursday, 2011-09-08 08:40:24 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 09/08/2011 08:18 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> >Korrawit, Eike, did you check the context to verify that it should
> >really read
> >
> >a.nChar1 == a.nChar2
> >
> >instead of
> >
> >a.nChar1 == b.nChar1
> >
> >in th
On 09/08/2011 08:18 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 09/08/2011 01:44 AM, Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi Korrawit,
On Wednesday, 2011-09-07 22:01:09 +0700, Korrawit Pruegsanusak wrote:
Attached patch will clear the cppcheck warning for duplicate
expression on both sides of '<'.
Yup, good catch!
http:/
On 09/08/2011 01:44 AM, Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi Korrawit,
On Wednesday, 2011-09-07 22:01:09 +0700, Korrawit Pruegsanusak wrote:
Attached patch will clear the cppcheck warning for duplicate
expression on both sides of '<'.
Yup, good catch!
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id
Hi Korrawit,
On Wednesday, 2011-09-07 22:01:09 +0700, Korrawit Pruegsanusak wrote:
> Attached patch will clear the cppcheck warning for duplicate
> expression on both sides of '<'.
Yup, good catch!
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=a58ed493e572fef2c503bd329e924bb062ba9c96
