Hi Kohei,
To start with your last remark ( I'm very very confused. ):
I do not want you guys to stop improving code, change thing for the
better etc. On the contrary: I do applaud it.
I know that you are aware of the risks of the necessary changes and do
all that is reasonable to avoid it.
I
On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 08:26 +0200, Cor Nouws wrote:
Hope I have made my concerns a bit more clear now.
Not really, I'm probably in the same boat as Kohei and somewhat confused
by the whole thread. Maybe we need *shorter* emails that don't try to be
polite ;-) Problem at the top, proposed
Hi Caolán,
Caolán McNamara wrote (13-09-11 12:30)
On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 08:26 +0200, Cor Nouws wrote:
Hope I have made my concerns a bit more clear now.
Not really, I'm probably in the same boat as Kohei and somewhat confused
Ah good to read. Real devs never are good in understanding my
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Cor Nouws oo...@nouenoff.nl wrote:
Thus the solution is: earlier feature freeze.
I disagree that this is _the_ solution. we could feature freeze
today... and that would not change a things unless QA is actually
done... and reciprocally, there is no need for a
Hi Norbert,
Norbert Thiebaud wrote (13-09-11 23:48)
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Cor Nouwsoo...@nouenoff.nl wrote:
Thus the solution is: earlier feature freeze.
I disagree that this is _the_ solution. we could feature freeze
today... and that would not change a things unless QA is
Hi,
[Please *first read my next mail* on this list !]
Let me also reply on the minutes of tech. steering call:
from Re: [Libreoffice] minutes of tech. steering call ...
Michael Meeks wrote (08-09-11 17:28)
+ Cor's considerations on release timing
Better: time available between
Hi,
from Re: [Libreoffice] minutes of tech. steering call ...
Michael Meeks wrote (08-09-11 17:28)
+ not too late to discuss at the conference and move
freeze dates by a week or two (Norbert)
If it is true that ...
none of the devs have working of
On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 00:23 +0200, Cor Nouws wrote:
+ always a trade-off between quality, community fun,
pace of development (Michael)
No real argument. I am more interested in the question: do we want
avoid another 3.4-style release?
So, our memory is
Hi Cor, all,
I jump to the point I would like to discuss:
[...]
- development in the quality and the use of tools for testing
- is attention in testing well spread over Windows / Linux / MacOS ?
- are there other releases/tasks that need attention during that time ?
- how many people are
Hi Sophie,
Sophie Gautier wrote (08-09-11 22:38)
We need to change the way we involve the native-lang communities in
our testing process. They are currently a bit lost by the quick turn
over of the versions, [...]
Indeed, that is an extra load for the testers/ native-lang community
members.
Hi,
for testers it might be really nice to release alpha/beta tarballs
during early stages of development cycle.
This would allow at least me to add it for testing into Gentoo and I
think quite few people would test it that way. I provide even live
ebuild that compiles from the git, but I think
Hi Kohei,
Kohei Yoshida wrote (05-09-11 02:50)
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Cor Nouwsoo...@nouenoff.nl wrote:
- How much time can one annoying bug ask? Two day, two weeks?
e.g. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40466#c10
Hmm... I don't see the relevance of my comment in
Cor,
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Cor Nouws oo...@nouenoff.nl wrote:
- How much time can one annoying bug ask? Two day, two weeks?
e.g. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40466#c10
Hmm... I don't see the relevance of my comment in the bug to what you
are stating here. What do
13 matches
Mail list logo
