On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 20:21 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
Unless I'm failing to see the obvious I wouldn't have a problem with
using boost in sal and friends, assuming we stick to the vast majority
of boost that don't require linking against specific boost libs.
Sounds reasonable to
On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 00:53 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Caolan McNamara wrote:
Was there a policy against using boost in sal/cppu/etc ?
I somehow forgot the rationale, but yeah:
http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=interface-discussmsgNo=869
Unless I'm failing to see the
On Sat, 2010-11-13 at 00:19 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Caolan McNamara wrote:
So, with a bit more poking around I discovered the template trick to
force a compile time error if the argument is not an array, and to
calculate at compile time the length of the array.
Clever hack! :)
Caolan McNamara wrote:
Was there a policy against using boost in sal/cppu/etc ?
I somehow forgot the rationale, but yeah:
http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=interface-discussmsgNo=869
-- Thorsten
pgpCyQLOPmvfW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Caolan McNamara wrote:
So, with a bit more poking around I discovered the template trick to
force a compile time error if the argument is not an array, and to
calculate at compile time the length of the array.
Clever hack! :)
Along those lines, any reason not to use boost in sal / udk? I've
