Agreed - thanks a bunch, I really appreciate the efforts you all put into
maintaining and improving our gerrit and Jenkins experiences :-)
Chris
> On 8 Mar 2016, at 4:23 AM, Thorsten Behrens
> wrote:
>
> David Ostrovsky wrote:
>> Yesterday, the right Gerrit
David Ostrovsky wrote:
> Yesterday, the right Gerrit version was deployed on gerrit.l.o.
>
Thanks a whole lot - to all of you for making this happen in the end.
Way cool! :)
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Hi David,
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 09:34:24AM +0100, David Ostrovsky d.ostrov...@gmx.de
wrote:
I am looking forward to see Gerrit @ LibreOffice upgraded to upcoming
2.11 release that contains inline edit feature.
We expect that contributors build their changes, test it manually and
also run
On Thu, 2014-12-18 at 10:49 +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 09:34:24AM +0100, David Ostrovsky
d.ostrov...@gmx.de wrote:
I am looking forward to see Gerrit @ LibreOffice upgraded to upcoming
2.11 release that contains inline edit feature.
We expect that contributors
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 10:19:08AM +, Michael Meeks wrote:
- // that sounds like a stupid idea
+ // actually this is really cool for small changes
Also - we have various solutions to allow central compilation coming -
right.
;-)
Yes, inline editing is an
Hey,
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 10:19:08AM +, Michael Meeks wrote:
- // that sounds like a stupid idea
+ // actually this is really cool for small changes
Also - we have
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 11:55:35AM +0100, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
IMHO our reviewers are already one of the weakest link in our development
process as reviewing is normally only done by the people who have been
working on the code for a long time and know the code quite well.
So, if
On 18.12.2014 11:55, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
Hey,
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michael...@canonical.com
mailto:bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 10:19:08AM +, Michael Meeks wrote:
- // that sounds like
On 12/18/2014 12:44 PM, Michael Stahl wrote:
i disagree with your assessment of the feature. it will make things
easier for reviewers, because if you spot a trivial typo in a patch you
can just quickly fix it, you don't have to decide between downloading
the patch and editing it offline and