Re: LIcensing of libwp* and its effect on that of libcdr and libvisio

2012-02-28 Thread Lubos Lunak
On Monday 27 of February 2012, Michael Meeks wrote: On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 20:00 +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote: The older libwpd, libwpg and libwps libraries are LGPLv2+ The newer libcdr and libvisio libraries written in the same style are MPL/LGPL.v+2/GPLv2+ However, as they depend on libwp*

Re: LIcensing of libwp* and its effect on that of libcdr and libvisio

2012-02-28 Thread Tor Lillqvist
requires the result to be LGPL, the latter only has smaller requirements, which can be satisfied by providing a notice and our source code. Providing source code (or pre-built object files even), is not enough, necessarily. I am thinking from the perspective of somebody wanting to distribute

Re: LIcensing of libwp* and its effect on that of libcdr and libvisio

2012-02-27 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Tor, On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 20:00 +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote: The older libwpd, libwpg and libwps libraries are LGPLv2+ The newer libcdr and libvisio libraries written in the same style are MPL/LGPL.v+2/GPLv2+ Right. However, as they depend on libwp* stuff, and link to them